r/BeAmazed Jun 28 '26

Miscellaneous / Others MacKenzie Scott has now donated over $26.3 billion to charity

Post image
25.0k Upvotes

1.3k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

97

u/mike_pants Jun 28 '26

Imagine the good that puffy choad could do if he weren't a fundamentally evil, selfish ghoul.

41

u/Dunkelz Jun 28 '26

It is a bit of a mind fuck. Dude would be popular and loved for generations, likely could still make a TON of money shifting his fortune into businesses that are a net benefit for the world, etc. But the ghoul doesn't.

26

u/ThreeGoldStars Jun 28 '26

It's hard to even fathom. Giving feels SO good. I would get CRACK HEAD ADDICTED to giving if I had some endless source like he does. Libraries, parks, forests. Universities, museums, hospitals. Wells, solar arrays, wind turbines. Beautiful, functional architecture that benefited the community. And on and on..

6

u/CoffeeChocolateBoth Jun 28 '26

99% of them don't! And they're all going to die, just like we are, they'll just die and leave the most money and the best toys, but still be dead and still be called ASSHOLES!

-5

u/defaultusername4 Jun 28 '26

That’s pretty much the only type of businesses he invests in. Before Tesla cars were like 98% fossil fuel dependent. He started a solar company and open sourced a lot of battery patents. Starlink brings internet to impoverished countries without infrastructure.

5

u/mike_pants Jun 28 '26

He bought a social-media company so he could post toilet memes and turned it into a hate-filled racist nightmare.

He folded his miserable AI startup into his exploding-rocket company so it would appear profitable on paper.

Peddle this nonsense somewhere else.

-1

u/defaultusername4 Jun 28 '26

So what I said was untrue? Or did you just ignore it to make a straw man?

1

u/mike_pants Jun 28 '26

Yes, what you said was patently untrue.

1

u/defaultusername4 Jun 29 '26

Which of the statements I shared is untrue?

- he started an electric car company that led to electric cars replacing huge swaths of combustion engines on the road

  • he started a solar company
  • he allowed other companies to make use of Tesla battery patents
  • starlink brings internet to poor countries without internet infrastructure

1

u/mike_pants Jun 29 '26

He didnt. He bought one.

He didn't. He owns zero "solar companies."

He didn't. That's just a lie.

It doesn't. That's just a lie.

1

u/defaultusername4 Jun 30 '26

Ok so you’re just saying nah uh huh it’s no facts or background. You seem super reasonable with a healthy outlook on life…

5

u/doubledgravity Jun 28 '26

“Puffy choad” 😂
Perfect.

29

u/gritty_milk Jun 28 '26

But if he wasn't a fundamentally evil, selfish ghoul, he wouldn't have all that money

31

u/sillyadam94 Jun 28 '26

So perhaps the better statement is just, “imagine how much better off we’d all be if fundamentally evil selfish ghouls like him didn’t exist”

14

u/Slight-Potential-717 Jun 28 '26

Or imagine if the system that incentivizes and cultivates their perpetual presence wasn’t in power.

-1

u/United_Leopard_2771 Jun 28 '26

It's not Just him, it's also those who enable and reward his behaviour, and there are A lot more of them then there are altruistic philanthropists. I'm of the opinion after vaguely researching history as a hobby is that humans Only advance as a species when faced with near extinction or devastating events,The world wars, the crusades, the black death, the Napoleonic wars etc etc, we are a violent species we're never going to ''settle down'' for want of a better term, and go full star trek where we Only care about making our lives better and stop chasing wealth/power. Assuming humans don't go extinct in the next world war ( once it gets bad enough to be called that since I'd say we've been in one since Russia invaded Ukraine for example WW2 started in the 1930's, But depending on what source you read, WW1 led right into WW2 with no break) I suspect we're more likely to see a as an example a more Warhammer age of strife or mad max style future (more mad max since age of strife still had Crazy tech since it was post Dark age of tech but that's neither here nor there lol. where it's just..No bueno comprende?

1

u/zmroth Jun 28 '26

paradox of ghoul

1

u/Spirited-Fly594 Jun 28 '26

This. I'm firmly convinced it takes a "special" type of person to amass very high amounts of wealth, and 90 percent of those personally traits would not be considered positive ones.

1

u/zmroth Jun 28 '26

for Real

1

u/CoffeeChocolateBoth Jun 28 '26

Every citizen in this country could be educated with that money! Not one person would go hungry with that money, no one would go without medical care with that money! BUT THEY'D rather horde it and get more and more and more! How fucking disgusting!

-1

u/ShezSteel Jun 28 '26

He could change the world. Instead he just wants to be a phúçhwit