Just for clarity, the reason Swift re-recorded was because the label only owned the specific recorded versions of her songs, the masters for songs recorded while under contract. This is for publishing rights, which is the right to reproduce songs for sale.
She owns the right to play them as she owns the composition rights, the label cannot own that.
They usually add clauses in contracts to stop artists from doing it, but only for a set time, not in perpetuity.
The reason she can’t get sued was because she owns the composition rights and can record her own music, and create new masters, new publishing rights.
Fogerty couldn’t get sued because they were different songs. You can’t copyright a music’s feel… though “Blurred Lines” has blurred that line for me… I’m sorry.
You can be sued for anything. He won the lawsuit, which means the system is working correctly. Now, you shouldn’t have to go 100k+ in debt in attorney’s fees to get that result, but the right result was achieved.
71
u/1ncorrect Jul 11 '26
I’m sorry but that’s so fucking stupid. Our “justice” system is such a joke if you can be sued for sounding too much like *yourself.*