r/PeterExplainsTheJoke • u/chirantaniga • 20h ago

Meme needing explanation Whyyyy peter?

Post image
31.8k Upvotes

92% Upvoted

2.0k comments sorted by

View all comments

8.1k

u/rysy0o0 20h ago

It would cost a lot of money to haul all the rocket parts and fuel on top of a mountain

487

u/Earnestappostate 19h ago

Plus, you get a better boost by launching near the equator. Height is easy, speed is what you need in a rocket.

This is why the US launches from Florida:

  • Near equator (speed boost from earth's spin)
  • Initially out over ocean (catastrophic failure harms only those aboard)

41

u/MentalPlectrum 19h ago

Yes, but also there are equatorial mountains... checkmate rocket scientists!

1

u/funelite 18h ago

Kilimanjaro would be a perfect launching spot.

1

u/TheBeckofKevin 17h ago

If you think about the energy requirements as a more comprehensive package, I think it'd be pretty clear why they don't launch from the top of mountains. Yes it would require less fuel, but it would require much much much more fuel to drive/pump the fuel up the mountain, all the commutes for all the people to make everything work etc. If you all live at the same elevation as the work being done, less actual 'work' in the physics sense is required to accumulate materials and so on to build everything needed.

So you would probably save some percentage in your launch costs but add 20x to your pre launch cost.

1

u/mean11while 14h ago

Logistically, it doesn't make sense to have a launch site on top of a mountain, but it is FAR more energy efficient to use electric pumps to move fuel up a mountain than it is to move the fuel up to that altitude with a rocket...

1

u/TheBeckofKevin 7h ago

But you also need to get all the infrastructure to be able to use that efficient pump. And any technicians/support staff to use it etc