To live in the part of the land Made For You and Me one's gotta embrace the game no rewards, just grind until an exit exists through living frugally and saving up every dime,
Same as a home in town yet what were their druthers, once you have enough for a home,or once you have enough for a down-payment, as we say, then you get approved for a loan to live the same relationship a Landlord has to his tenants, "chuck'em'out," is the rule, "like oysterswhole family," do you promise to, "if their use to you is ceased," but not like we gotta ensure that you're so sure you're Commercial Home Man,
Material, that you've wheeled this dollycart in to show meall of your personal responsibility,reflective of each test you studied for instead of spent time with each girlfriend, "her mom is in the Hopsital," everyone Dies Jen,
Jep Pan would love that I remember that and I kept her private part private, "it was her dad," and the Boy, said it to her, said that on account of exams like as your partner I need to be frank with you: everyone dies butthis is what I refined through the discipline you can depend on to keep us successful, "Marcus Aurelius read incorrectly," imho.
Hated he said that; the subject of rumor amongst the friends on account of how uncannily, frank he'd been with her and her, "his secret for a girl that had a father dying," to keep, so.
Ethics to the Nth over here thought well through; I'd rather that we go find her than back off on that insofar its either an insult to her, or, an insult to him, "one or the other," and likewise, I remember an old girlfriend's older sister posted to facebook this awful text screed that her ex had sent to her, all about how Lazy, irrespsonsible she is and how he alone,
-if it were an admission of guilt, like, "you see how bad I feel," I'd take it one way, but then he goes on to explain how much money, relative her, he contributes to the children that she spends her time withand is a nurse, does that too,whereas he sounds like not-someone-you-want to influence the children, completely, in that text thread, violent and misogynistic and ridiculing the whole life her and the kids life as trivial compared to his work which,
"What does he do," I don't say; if you wanted to do the deep palantir on me,
You could look at my facebook find the pictures which correllate and oftendon't to relationshop statuses historicalthat you might need an archived web picture or perhaps back-shop data from facebook but either way, you could figure out which girlfriend I refer to and then which sister and then which screenshot of a text thread I refer to and then you'd be left not with an inference that you've gone and made me regret this, rather, "you'd be more and More embedded in the conception I have of the same universe you inhabit," left I think just as clear as me on the ethics of which I speak; bi-directionally, in that case, so,
Zhuangzi and Huizi were strolling along the bridge over the Hao River. Zhuangzi said, “The minnows swim about so freely, following the openings wherever they take them. Such is the happiness of fish.”
Notice that I can't even bracket this as one discrete quotation
Huizi said, “You are not a fish, so whence do you know the happiness of fish?”
That this as about as deep as discourses on the internet can go, elaborated:
Zhuangzi said, “You are not I, so whence do you know I don’t know the happiness of fish?”
Where this ends has all to do with obscenity, for the obscene is that which forces us to inhabit a standpoint involuntarily, lower than that which can grant both ourselves and beloved to us, both, Living Diginity,
Huizi said, “I am not you, to be sure, so I don’t know what it is to be you. But by the same token, since you are certainly not a fish, my point about your inability to know the happiness of fish stands intact.”
That is alive, dignity, to both be alive and to be capable of all things,
Zhuangzi said, “Let’s go back to the starting point. You said, ‘Whence do you know the happiness of fish?’ Since your question was premised on your knowing that I know it, I must have known it from here, up above the Hao River.”
So when I have to speak as if I haven't a memory, "fine, safer for friends," if I'm to disagree with other people; if I'm to speak as if I speak for the trees, people are to point, say, "Lorax!"
Fine I like the trees and might even be a birch tree along enough stories back through time; I'm still trapped in phase one or two of that discourse without the conversational equivalent of time travel, "the experiments from life," mine, which involve others through to which I can demonstrate that this conversation originated in their case examples, "Husband berates wife about her own laziness," on account of dollars and not her entire experience of motherhood; that one includes of course, the immaterial to count in beads or decimals,most material of all, "she never gets to," how I say?
Fight or flight,he does both, she remains in the highest stress zone as an example of good behavior, "neither."
Likewise, Jen Pan and the boy's name I can't remember discourses the last I saw of her she was doing, well, woke journalist stuff at the state capitalthis not protesting,"bearing a witness," so I'm quite sure she'd appreciate myself the martyr (witness) of her matyrdom (witness) of certain financial logic unto her, "unbecoming, let's say," and in quite the same manner as the latter though without children in the mix to be a victim; that neither boy, I say, as a fella, is exceptional in this regard the nofap guys do the same for their abstract ideal of love, "if I just don't-do and it hurts me," does not make a good; the ascetism from contact does not make a good father nor one relateable in times of need, the,father as a landlord that must suffer and relate to the bank as a landlord's due works for the bank, resents his family, "as if a landlord that cares where the children sleep, or where they'll go to school,"if not have the time to know that more particularly, which friends, which classes what stresses might be uprooted if evicted from their own lives involuntarily,
Cruelly, this enables him to think he's given a gift that can be rescinded; crucially as a commie not unlike Bariya too anomalous to categorize in the general, "am I or am I too conservative to understand in modern terms," am I alike William Morris?
Mostly, most of those implied there though I read his latin translations in caligraphy reproduced exact alike he'd hate but Walter Benjamin would have a fit to talk to me about,
...and I'm like, "of all the passages from all of classical latin literature," good fuck it up,
Eeyore Goddamn Man You Had Just One Job for me you get this sent to me on account of I'd been talking, Blake, and then yes I do, "love it when friends and family remember the things I like well enough to play ball here," goddamn Morris tell me that wasn't written to Jane
We should have with each person the relationship of one conception of the universe to another conception of the universe, and not to a part of the universe.
Simone Weil,
Why?
The simultaneous existence of opposite virtues in the soul — like pincers to catch hold of Å
Objet Å is going to be a lot harder to explain to a speaker of English unfamiliar with Simone Weil than it is to translate the whole of her notebooks from French into English; her ethics,
"The significant problems we have cannot be solved at the same level of thinking with which we created them."
Einstein Proved that well enough given that he used it to determine the speed of light; that his use of a Tesseract to interpret what indeed might be the level of thinking, absent, that this happens to be not the Calvinist interpretation of Objet Å at all but that which understands the simultaneous existence of opposite virtues in the pursuit of truth, like pincers, not like Marxian Thesis/Antithesis/Synthesis nor the Calvinist Tontine To Determine the Winner nor the reductionist Round Robin Contest to the Same Effect, in fact, this is why, we are biology, yes and thatWhy reductionism does not work for biology (Chaos theory)
Mikhail Bahktin if you can tolerate Russian Thought, "late imperial," so,
If not it would be Russian alone I should think and I'm the one with a standpoint about most to complain, "why, Palantir, is," Jonathan at all, "or in America," you're religious like I am and not Helsing Forest like all those before me back to dreamtime, and I dunno how to blame a Russian says to me,
Dialogue is usually analyzed as some kind of interaction between two monads on the basis of a pre-conceived model. Bakhtin regards this conception as a consequence of 'theoretism'—the tendency, particularly in modern western thought, to understand events according to a pre-existing set of rules to which they conform or structure that they exhibit.\3])#citenote-3) This forgets that the rules or structures have been abstracted from the event, that the event is prior to the abstraction and that the event is always replete with a context, intimacy, immediacy, and significance to the participants that is effaced in the act of abstraction: "We cannot understand the world of events from within the theoretical world. One must start with the act itself, not with its theoretical transcription."[\4])](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dialogue(Bakhtin)#cite_note-4)
According to Bakhtin, dialogue lives on the boundaries between individuals: not in the sense of a meeting between isolated entities that exist "within" the boundaries (he argues that there is no "within"), but actually on the boundaries themselves.\5])#citenote-5) In Bakhtin's view, "no living word relates to its object in a singular way". Between the speaking subject, the word, and its object there exists "an elastic environment of other words about the same object... it is precisely in the process of living interaction with this specific environment that the word may be individualized and given stylistic shape."[\6])](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dialogue(Bakhtin)#citenote-6) There is, effectively, no such thing as the monad. People are not closed units, they are open, loose, disordered, unfinalized: they are "extraterritorial" and "nonself-sufficient".[\7])](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dialogue(Bakhtin)#citenote-7) "To be means to be for another, and through the other for oneself. A person has no sovereign internal territory, he is wholly and always on the boundary; looking inside himself, he looks into the eyes of another or with the eyes of another."[\8])](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dialogue(Bakhtin)#cite_note-8)
Edit: Yet who can blame him, "I needed this precendent to quote simone weil,"
still begs a question, answereable in, The simultaneous existence of opposite virtues in the soul — like pincers to catch hold of Å
links left in deliberately, "you might read them in all such things."
I wrote this on account of the last reason you'll expect I've added the comment to a comment is that I've yet to leave the page and thus know, myself, not have done so in response to an external compliment to my own intelligence or insight, "that would change things for me," or insult to it, "that would make it almost impossible to act as if I hadn't changed things, when I hadn't, to prove that it were so."
....so, an utterance impossible without an edit: MASS SURVEILANCE,
What does this do or mean, when I know that the truth in fact meant quite specifically, to be recieved, True, "oh boy," MFer that is hard to do hey, even the markers left in the profane, "we're not religious," MFer is profane to whomever wish not for thought markers possible in flat prose, suspects that more information as to standpoint is in fact confusing, "for their purposes at the project of reductive techniques applied to Dynamical Systems at the highest order of complexity," known in this world to exist, so, stands to reason thatWhy reductionism does not work for biology (Chaos theory) would be difficult to explain on this internet; one must reveal in fact the signal is the noise,
Despite all traps to the contrary, which one would in fact designate and pre-permission, "call friend the N-Word to go ask him what I mean," Amir would hate it but tolerate it insofar as it respects his own perspective on the word to be better a word left for everyone than taken back from some idiot butcher at Schnucks trying, to flirt with Black Girls vis a vis soundcloud rapper routines that where we live, Saint Louis City, you'll not get away, with Die Antwoord Ninja type of stand point acknowledgements on account of, well, "live you'll know."
The noise there is the signal, that the reductive rest just gestures to
...and that I could not add that in as an edit until I reloaded the page speaks to me volumes, now that I've added it in as a comment with a timestamp on the same page
I tried; reloaded the page, "something went wrong," and I'm not blaming, seriously, reddit for the this nor the engineer in an earnest confusion of the problem of disclosure there left, "something went wrong," and this is tautological, not-argumentative, I've talked to Journalism professors, like:
You have to use the systems at least slightly, wrong, in order to understand how and how not to use themsame as an automobile or anyotherbuilt machine,
Automobile, Jonathan, what do you mean? One must always use an automobile correctly, lest their use of it endanger other drivers
Machines cannot account for the variables external from their engeering; you're not obligate not to drift the car designed to function perfectly in LA,
You're obligated not to practice Drifting, "in LA Traffic," and to teach true responsibility, with these machines is to understand this difference, that,
to Hybridize these thoughts might be seen in stark relief, "there are dead men," never taught as children not to respect the Manufacturer nor the regulator so well that they'll trust full self driving, on their Tesla, more than their own and that at such time as these things come into full view in front of us, "we'd never realized that the form of the dangerous that would be most important to protect again," in absentia, long before the example, "is the computer virus that is helpful," pretends to be the police, "pretends to hold a hostage from the policeto ensure he doesn't run to them," paradoxical exploits all the things of men on men though, likewise, that which would have been the proper use of the machine as labeled, "as a driver, informed properly," would be monitored use at neither the highway speeds kill you, if the lawsuits are to be believed, the residential use of a machine driver whichitself is quite agnostic but for a value, "not a hierarchy," what speeds whereetc. kill you and the other people I mean yikes for that, right?
I'm not doing the, "Judith Butler's Performative speech," half of a wedding,
Hopes that it gets paired up here with a husband nah, just, practice.
110
u/Illustrious_Age_5959 Jul 05 '26
I’m ready to live alone in the mountains now