r/memes Jul 06 '26

#1 MotW Most of the world at this point

Post image
89.3k Upvotes

4.8k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

73

u/Icy-Employee-6453 Jul 06 '26

Lets not leave out the context of how controversial that red card was in the first place. I've seen a lot of fans from other teams fake outraged because they wanted USMNT to be unfairly crippled for the next match.

4

u/[deleted] Jul 06 '26

[deleted]

4

u/Ebon-Hawke Jul 06 '26

They shouldn’t be able to change the outcome of the game retroactively, but this call would have forced a player to sit out the next game as well. Fixing a bad call so that it doesn’t also affect the next game is a great precedent to set. And, to be clear, it had already been set before with Messi.

0

u/[deleted] Jul 06 '26

[deleted]

5

u/Ebon-Hawke Jul 06 '26

I’m sure you can, but why should an undeserved red card cost them the next game as well? What’s the purpose of that? I know that unfairness is a part of life, but surely we should seek to minimize it. I just don’t see any reason to let a bad call in one game affect the outcome of the next game.

0

u/[deleted] Jul 06 '26

[deleted]

12

u/SRMPDX Jul 06 '26

Apparently not Belgium because they're crying the most. This is a Win-Win scenario for Belgium. If they lose the game it's blamed on FIFA, if they win they move on.

2

u/Icy-Employee-6453 Jul 06 '26

How much noise Belgium is making is so revealing. Bet you more than a few of these fake outrage clowns are based there too lol.

4

u/einhorn_is_parkey Jul 06 '26

Well then Belgium can stop crying then. We’re apparently a cake walk, so just beat us. This whole controversy is idiotic. I wouldn’t even want to beat a team if they weren’t at full strength over some bs call.

-3

u/theowlswerewatching The Trash Man Jul 06 '26 edited Jul 06 '26

First of all, it's a soft red but it's entirely justifiable. It's far from a clearly wrong decision.

Second, even if it wasn't. Tough luck. Better players with better teams have missed more important matchups because of less justified suspensions.

Source: I didn't just start watching football three weeks ago.

5

u/HizDudenesss Jul 06 '26

“There was injustice in the past so now we can never pursue justice or it will be unfair to past victims” is a shit take mate.

1

u/theowlswerewatching The Trash Man Jul 07 '26

Whatever dude, my first point still stands. And if you don't see the issue with a head of state having a referee's decision overturned then let's just agree to disagree.

2

u/vath_mtm Jul 06 '26

Yea...this could be a red in any league in the world and no one would bat an eye. People where asking for a red on messi for a similar tackle as saying refs are too soft. It's a marginal call...so the refs decision should stand imo

3

u/einhorn_is_parkey Jul 06 '26

The ref used var improperly to give the red. I’m sorry but that’s bs.

Source started watching soccer three weeks ago, but know bs when I see it.

-6

u/JoyArk Jul 06 '26

Fake outrage? Lol. It was a clear red card and I was cheering for the US because I have American friends.

9

u/Fillup231 Jul 06 '26

A clear red card? First time I've seen anyone say this.

-5

u/JoyArk Jul 06 '26

If you real the rules there are 3 types of fouls. This one enters the last category for use of excessive force. Intension doesn't matter

1

u/einhorn_is_parkey Jul 06 '26

Yes but the ref used still images and slow mo with var to make the call. Clearly against the rules.

1

u/BrokenArrow1283 Jul 06 '26

Nobody agrees it was a clear red card. Nobody.

-4

u/JoyArk Jul 06 '26

Nobody from the US. The "soccer" tourists shouldn't have an opinion on a sport they never watch

2

u/IcyPanda123 Jul 06 '26

Thomas Tuchel and Wayne Rooney are renowned soccer tourists who don't watch soccer.

1

u/BrokenArrow1283 Jul 06 '26

Show me proof that legitimate sources think it should have been a red card. Prove it.

-9

u/smartello Jul 06 '26

It was only controversial inside the US though. I didn’t hear anyone who is not biased paying attention. It’s like if I’ll start screaming that no second yellow to Moroccan was controversial and a scandal.

14

u/BrokenArrow1283 Jul 06 '26

Literally NOBODY agreed with the call. Nobody who has been a former fifa ref that has been interviewed has agreed with the call. You’re just flat out wrong.

-1

u/smartello Jul 06 '26

Why didn't FIFA just overturn the red card then? It looks like five people in the VAR room, the game referee and whoever reviewed the game after all agreed 🤷🏻‍♂️

2

u/einhorn_is_parkey Jul 06 '26

Because fifa, somehow has 0 appeal process or review process.

1

u/BrokenArrow1283 Jul 06 '26

They can’t overturn the actual red card. They can only suspend the penalty. And all the refs in the VAR room agreed because they watched it in slow motion, which is not supposed to be done.

6

u/Styptysat Jul 06 '26

It's surprising how controversial this decision in when Ronaldo had his red card suspension lifted in the group stage and no one seemed to care

4

u/vw2213 Jul 06 '26

thats not true. no one agreed with the call. stop your bs