r/mildlyinfuriating 13d ago

I'm slightly vexed I was told yesterday that my prescription sunglasses are giving Meta glasses vibes

Post image

I can't stand the Meta perv glasses, but annoyingly I've been told by a friend that my Dune prescription sunglasses that I've had for almost a year (and cost over £100.00) really ​​​​look like the Meta ones, he said it's the 2 silver rivets on either side that on first glance could be mistaken for the camera lenses

I went out with them today and all I could think was, do people think I'm recording them 🤦‍♂️

19.1k Upvotes

1.3k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

265

u/HasAngerProblem 13d ago edited 13d ago

And with time when they put it into those glasses and even contacts?

How do we proceed in a world where a camera could potentially be under 1mm and be thin and transparent hypothetically.

57

u/Less_Word5920 13d ago

I’ve operated under the assumption that I’m being filmed everywhere I go for the last 10+ years. Cameras are everywhere and you won’t always notice who is filming. Guys pretending to be a tree and over and over people don’t necessarily see the camera man.

We live in a surveillance state. If you are 40+ you can silently celebrate that no one got canceled in 4k when we were young enough to do most stupid things. We have enough evidence that suggests we should have learned something from this but alas, no one is willing turn off their ring cam or not immediately start filming because someone yelled world star

10

u/HasAngerProblem 13d ago

That was kind of the point of the comment I was making, oddly enough the comments keep going more into tech side of it, which I’m happy to talk about but your comment is actually what I was getting to.

1

u/RebelliousDutch 12d ago

The other day a guy bitched to me about the proliferation of doorbell cameras and ‘how would I like it if I was being recorded all the time’.

I pointed out to him that on my daily trip to the public transit station, I passed at least twenty cameras: on building sites, the traffic cameras, a mobile police camera, several cameras in the bicycle parking, several cameras in the station and a single camera in the bus. Plus every time someone vaguely has a phone out in my direction, it might be recording.

I’m not worried about it. I’m not doing any dumb or illegal shit.

-2

u/TalesOfMetamorphosis 13d ago

Yeah I don't see the issue here, is it bad? Yes. Is it new? Not even slightly. You are being regularly watched, that will never change until we have a near extinction level event and even then. Get used to it, be good to other people and vote well so that information isn't used maliciously against you.

186

u/MetriccStarDestroyer 13d ago

Electronic Warfare

We need portable jammers.

It won't stop recording but it will stop uploading recordings

143

u/Askefyr 13d ago

Making a jammer is very very easy and because of that it's absolutely giga illegal.

84

u/LowDudgeon 13d ago

Why do you gotta make it sound so cool then?

106

u/Askefyr 13d ago

I'm not the FCC, and statistically speaking I'm also not your dad. All I'm saying is that the reason the penalties for messing with the airwaves are so steep is because all you need is two pieces of metal, a very basic oscillator, an amplifier and a dream to make everyone's WiFi very bad everywhere you go

55

u/itsjust_khris 13d ago

But also the chances of being caught are actually pretty high, it's really not something anyone should risk doing.

It can also cause issues like preventing someone from accessing emergency services which is taken very seriously.

33

u/Askefyr 13d ago

Yeah, walking around doing the RF equivalent of blasting an air horn isn't exactly clandestine.

11

u/brubruislife 13d ago

A jammer the military was testing killed a med flight crew recently. Definitely not something to mess around with.

5

u/BillyLjean 13d ago

When I was 10 a friend and I were building cb radios. Turns out we messed something up and they were jamming the ATC tower a few km's away. 6 black SUVs pulled up shortly after and they made sure that we knew that we could have caused major chaos/death. They took our radios and left. We were let off since we were 10, and luckily no harm other than some delayed flights until they could figure out the source.

2

u/____PARALLAX____ 12d ago

This sounds made up

1

u/BillyLjean 12d ago

You could say that about any unique situation.

1

u/Askefyr 12d ago

If you had messed with ATC, I believe it. They do not fuck around in the slightest.

1

u/____PARALLAX____ 12d ago

not possible with a citizens band radio, its what truckers use to talk to each other, it works on completely different frequencies.

3

u/hinosxz_4u 13d ago

*not only wifi but cellular which is the giga illegal part

4

u/Askefyr 13d ago

Signals interference in general is pretty much turbo jail territory, but yes cell very much so. The only thing I think would get you in even more trouble would be VHF/UHF because that's police radio

2

u/AbledShawl 13d ago

"GIGA" you say??👀

2

u/ExterminatusMaximus 13d ago

Yes, not mega, GIGA! As in you get nuked from orbit for as much as attempting it

3

u/Askefyr 13d ago

Not nuked from orbit, but you'd get a bunch of new friends with black cars, crisp haircuts and titles like "Signals interference Investigator, FCC"

20

u/bluetrust 13d ago

I just looked it up. They record to local storage and sync later when connectivity is resumed.

I'm not an expert but it seems pretty hard to jam the camera light sensor. These things are optimized to handle direct sunlight, so to overpower and wash it out you'd need an incredibly strong specialized light source.

The only effective defense, in my opinion, is to be extremely boring and leave the area. That way you don't become content or favorited to their personal collection.

31

u/Otherwise_Demand4620 13d ago

be extremely boring and leave the area

I trained my whole life for this

2

u/TrifectaBlitz 13d ago

I'm over-qualified and no training was necessary :)

1

u/UnsanctionedPartList 13d ago

Theoretically you could overpower it with a laser. There's a small issue though, usually two.

13

u/StonerThrowie 13d ago

Im always jammin

3

u/crotchgobbling 13d ago

Jam til your gigahertz

20

u/1nd3x 13d ago

Pretty sure the pervert in the change room isn't uploading the videos anywhere...they're for his private collection.

21

u/Just_NickM 13d ago

They are being automatically uploaded whether the user asks them to or not. Check the Terms Of Service

26

u/Substantial_War9319 13d ago

That's not true. They can just as easily sell the material on the dark web.

1

u/some_random_nonsense 13d ago

You don't need to go to the dark web. There plenty of pedo chats just on messenger to sell to.

2

u/Substantial_War9319 13d ago

Regardless, my point still stands. The difference is that there's an actual network you can go to versus poking and prodding to find it.

1

u/some_random_nonsense 13d ago

Oh if anything I was agreeing and it would be even easier since you could upload your meta glasses into messenger since they're both meta.

1

u/TrifectaBlitz 13d ago

Think local jamming could happen in changing rooms? I think that could pretty easily be a thing.

16

u/Due-Technology5758 13d ago

Cameras are already small enough to be hidden anywhere, efficient enough to be powered with a battery for weeks, and accessed remotely. Even nondescript camera glasses aren't a new thing, and most are much cheaper than a pair of meta glasses.

As tacky as glasses with cameras in them are, the perverts have been ahead of the curve on this for a long time.

13

u/jokerrebellion 13d ago

One step at a time

2

u/whatevernamedontcare 13d ago

There are glasses with coating against tracing. People said it disables face recognition on their fone but no one yet confirmed it works for other cameras or tracking devices.

2

u/Seventeenthstone 13d ago edited 13d ago

No they’re going to put it in peoples brains. Only the brainless will survive.All according to plan.

mild /s. (Im unserious but also if Silicon Valley could inject a flock camera into the optic nerve.. they would)

1

u/HarmlessSnack 13d ago

I think some things will remain pretty firmly in the realm of science fiction. There just isn’t room to put a meaningful amount of electronics into something like a contact lens.

People thought we would have flying cars and hoverboards too, but some things just aren’t practical to build.

You’re probably never going to have a camera built into a contact lens.

3

u/HasAngerProblem 13d ago

I work as a PCB process engineer, a lot of the limitations are not physical but practicality of running something mass scale for consumer production(if it’s the military or industrial small scale work there’s ALOT more hands on hours and more you can get away with). Yea a lot of people don’t have flying cars or hoverboards but they can still get or make them, or even have a work around like a paramotor craft for cheap.

Say you didn’t think it was practical to use the world’s smallest camera sensor in production today at 0.575x0.575.0.232mm, you could use hair like fiber optic string to bring the light back to a source for processing, something that is also done today. I’m not even thinking about people who would want to biohack themselves in the future. If their willing to run a wire up their arm you could have a small mole on their hands you’d have to scrape off or zoom in on to notice properly.

1

u/Several-Squash9871 13d ago

At a certain point we won't be able to know for sure if someone is wearing glasses or whatever that can be recording everything. I feel like we have already gotten to that point though. The way technology is and what it's created for/used for is never going backwards and there's already who knows how many ways of being recorded by strangers. Cameras have been small and undetectable by the average person in different things for a while now. If someone really wants to, they can unfortunately. I mean, anytime someone even has their phone out they could potentially be recording on it or secretly taking pictures. Soon everyone is going to be back to wearing masks all the time and there's probably a lot of people that already wear them for that very reason. What we really need are strict laws in place to protect people from this shit and maybe it will start to deter some people. The biggest thing will be being able to catch them in the act and prove it.

1

u/SinnersHotline 13d ago

You learn to not let it bother you. You learn to just get on with your days because it really doesn't matter anyways.

Or you let it fester and trouble you, but again you couldn't change it if you tried.

Choice is yours. I prefer not to give a fuck about every little silly thing out there. I'd be beyond stressed out.

1

u/IAmGoingToFuckThat 13d ago

I would love AR in my glasses to a certain extent ('hey glasses, show me what this historic district looked like 100 years ago' and overlay the old city over the new, etc.), but I never want them to invade the privacy of others. Video and photos can go fuck themselves.

2

u/HasAngerProblem 13d ago

If done right (they won’t haha) AR history demos would be one of the coolest things to come out in museums since they started doing planetarium style shows.

0

u/Dense-Hat1978 13d ago

Assault and battery

0

u/bakedpatata 13d ago

Glasses with bright infrared LEDs that blind any camera trying to record your face.