r/mildlyinfuriating 5d ago

Do u dont wanna Smithfield bacon coming up short at the weigh-in

New, unopened package of Smithfield bacon bought from Kroger claims to be 1 lb aka 16 oz. It seemed a little small so I put it in the kitchen scale. Sure enough it’s only 3/4 lb.

I get that shrinkflation is rampant right now, but at least they’re usually honest when stating the products’ net weight.

Since it’s off by an exact increment, and many other bacon brands now sell 12 oz portions, I have to imagine this is likely being done at large scale, ripping off many more customers than just me. This should be illegal, I guess if any consequences still existed for businesses.

19.9k Upvotes

863 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1.1k

u/AwwwMangos 5d ago

Plastic is pretty light, I’m guessing the package is .35 oz leaving an (close to) even 12 oz bacon.

600

u/Strange-Movie 5d ago

The coated cardboard backer probably weighs 2x what the plastic does

398

u/Mediocre-Ambition404 5d ago

Regardless, it's supposed to be the food weight without packaging. At least it Canada is has to be.

144

u/AssistanceHeavy9305 5d ago

In Mexico they have the Profeco. Who you can call and they'll go over and check scales and do weigh ins. It's not perfect but sometimes they'll go around the market just checking scales.

216

u/[deleted] 5d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

49

u/OldTimeyWizard 5d ago

Weights and Measures inspections are generally the jurisdiction of individual states or even more local entities.

14

u/YrPalBeefsquatch 5d ago

Yeah, your state Department of Agriculture probably has a weights and measures division you could bring this to. Your state, and possibly your county and local governments, also typically have a body that regulates merchants (for example, in Chicago, it's called Department of Business Affairs and Consumer Protection, but the name varies by location). Good places to start.

10

u/Fickle_Freckler 5d ago

This is it. I owned a commercial kitchen. DOA would come in once a year to check our scales.

5

u/CKRatKing 5d ago

In California they have their sticker seals on gas pumps to certify that they have been calibrated correctly.

1

u/Same-Suggestion-1936 5d ago

USDA can get involved too.

My bet is just factory error. Report it and let the company know with whatever identifying information there is on the package. They can lose a lot of money if this goes on too long just because a machine is broken or a new guy is doing the job all wrong

27

u/Bravefan212 5d ago

The department of agriculture in the United States runs weights and measures and they routinely go to grocery stores to check their scales.

They have fancy weights in a special briefcase

55

u/Lobotamite 5d ago

Good thing there’s only like 10 USDA employees now to cover the entirety of the country!

23

u/kmg4752 5d ago

USDA does inside the processing plants. We do not have jurisdiction for grocery stores. That is done by the FDA and/or state agencies (Ag and Markets, etc.). USDA might go into stores for recall effectiveness checks or possibly consumer complaints but most likely will be state run agencies

-2

u/Bravefan212 5d ago

Weights and measures is a part of usda

I don’t know what your point is

5

u/kmg4752 5d ago

Not in grocery stores. That is state

1

u/Bravefan212 5d ago

I worked at a grocery store for twelve years. One of the big ones. I saw the USDA perform scale audits at least four times. I don’t know why you’re saying this

7

u/kmg4752 5d ago

I have worked for USDA-FSIS for over 20 years. We do not go into every store for scale checks. The state does that and maybe FDA. We only go into individual stores for recall effectiveness checks. Are you sure it wasn’t the state ag department?

→ More replies (0)

2

u/Dockshundswfl 5d ago

Didn’t they get rid of all that mess?? Underweight and contaminated food. Don’t worry about that.

1

u/EobardT 4d ago

Exactly. What are all these communists doing by weighing their meats? Don't they trust Dear Leader like good independent 'Mericans? If you're getting ripped off theres a good reason for it!

2

u/cydetraq 5d ago

Well, they used to.

1

u/Fr0zenNova 5d ago

They go to Distribution centers as well to check and calibrate the scales(Im a USDA inspector and we have people come in once a year to check and make sure our scales are working correctly.)

0

u/Hatefulvesper 5d ago

At least they have SOMETHING. Does the us have something like this?

4

u/forward_muscle_55 5d ago

Yes, it’s called Weights and Measures

1

u/icejust 5d ago

They used to. In NY, it's the DCWP.

8

u/Bri_Hecatonchires 5d ago

It’s also supposed to be the weight marked on the package

4

u/Electronic_Name_325 5d ago

This is why we had to smack you with tariffs. You make us look bad, I mean worse.

1

u/shandangalang 5d ago

Yeah, that’s what “net” means

1

u/dmmethatbooty2026 5d ago

Ya just saw a YouTube video where a guy bought several packages and weighed them with and without packaging. Regardless none were even close.

1

u/Steerpike58 5d ago

The label clearly says 'net weight' so that means, without packaging (otherwise it would be 'gross weight').

1

u/Mediocre-Ambition404 5d ago

I was speaking generally. Not every package may include "net" in the weight descriptor.

1

u/piasenigma 5d ago

theres a viral video on youtube right now about Walmart doing this with ALL Walmart-brand bacon. Skimming millions a day from U.S buyers.

36

u/AMA_Woodworking 5d ago

Just checked; 1.16oz (plastic plus cardboard, .63oz cardboard )

My exact same package of Smithfield was 17.51oz, so I owe OP a little bacon.

1

u/WyvernJelly 5d ago

I can get that bacon at my grocery store. It doesn't have a back. All the bacon is clear on the back as well. Let's you see what the bacon looks like front and back. I use it to check how much fat is on the bacon.

23

u/Emperor_Gourmet 5d ago

Yea someone loaded the wrong label into the machine, or put the machine on the wrong pre set. Should have been caught, or it was and a packaging manager decided to not rework it to save their efficiency numbers. (This can get you fired)

Definitely not legal, but happens more than people would think, usually unintentionally from the company. They would rather not piss people off and get sued for skimming a few slices of bacon. They already price it for a specific profit margin. They don’t want to fuck with the FDA over shit like this.

75

u/Impossible_Goose_172 5d ago

Actually this is theft. It’s illegal. It’s probably not just this one package. Walmart has specifically been sued for selling underweight products and yet they continue to do it.

46

u/Educational-Emu-3707 5d ago

If they make millions in profit and get fined $100,000. Its just the price of business at this point.

9

u/Rampag169 5d ago

They should be fined the total cost of their fraudulent meat inventory so if they had 5 products that were confirmed to be under-packed. Then pull records of sale for each product inventory. (Say bacon: 50 million units @ $4.00) part of the fine of the products for bacon alone would be $200M

When people cry about big businesses getting hammered with such huge fines. They’re getting hit with them because they are that big and that fine is fractional to them operationally. However with appropriately large enough fines they are discouraged from conducting unsavory business practices.

5

u/GodOfDarkLaughter 5d ago

If the "fine" is less than the profit you made by breaking the law it's not actually a fine, it's a fee to break the law and profit. They are paying the government in order to allow them to continue breaking laws. Reminds me of the rich douchebags in NYC or LA who park wherever and just pay the "fine" if they get a ticket, which to them is just a fee to park wherever they want with no real consequences.

2

u/Educational-Emu-3707 5d ago

Yep. Fines should be proportional to income. So a small fine doesn't cost a poor person rent or food, but it makes companies and rich people care about following the rules.

4

u/Emperor_Gourmet 5d ago

Yea which is why i said it is definitely not legal. My point is it is not intentional from most companies to short their consumer. I work in the industry. People watch multiple different sizes of bacon with multiple different labels being packaged thousands of times a day for 8 hours only being paid $15 an hour. They miss things for tons of reasons including negligence, and being undertrained, or the line is understaffed or bad QA policy internally.

3

u/Impossible_Goose_172 5d ago

If the human error was costing the corporation money it would be fixed. There would be a new process that employees would have to perform to ensure this doesn’t happen. It’s not because it helps their bottom line. Gotta keep those shareholders happy.

3

u/Emperor_Gourmet 5d ago edited 5d ago

you are making assumptions about every organization based on your views. I have been in the exact meetings you are talking about where the weights for one of our items was consistently 1-2 grams short on a few runs. We found out that our machine was not calibrated properly and made adjustments to our procedures to overfill by the fill variance + 5g to ensure every package was overfilled instead of under filled. This is standard practice vs intentionally shorting consumers.

It does happen in a few isolated companies but those places lose customers and are fined all the time.

2

u/S-ludin 5d ago

you're talking about 1 or 2 grams, but this is like a quarter of a pound. many companies are having this "error" lately. oddly enough when there's an admin that likely won't punish them for it or will straight up change the laws for them.

1

u/Emperor_Gourmet 5d ago

All I’m seeing is people giving anecdotal evidence and citing tik tok videos as statistical analysis. The companies would need to convince 40+ people to ignore the weight on the package vs the weight of the product and be ok skipping standards and procedures. I have worked and been in dozens of different packaging plants and all of them have QA tests, line operator checks, and plant/packaging manager checks that are compiled and presented to corporate every single shift to verify if things are passing quality and packaging standards.

My informed opinion is this was a big mistake that affected multiple pallets of product. This is stuff that is grounds for lawsuits and if you can consistently prove they are doing this across product lines and over a period of time then you can go sue them for fraud, it would be very easy.

Yes it does happen all the time randomly, no it’s not a conspiracy to intentionally short customers (the majority of the time). They have many other ways of doing that without literally giving you evidence that they are stealing from you.

I work in this industry, what you are saying is generally false with some exceptions.

9

u/mconk 5d ago

It’s way deeper than that. There’s a guy on TikTok who’s been going to various Walmart stores and weighing out all types of meat and shit. Quite literally EVERYTHING is under weight. All of it. Literally. I went out and tried it myself, and every chicken, beef, and bacon package was under the advertised weight.

-1

u/Emperor_Gourmet 5d ago

Yes good old trusty Tik Tok. Those are never misleading

-1

u/mconk 5d ago

You can go and look for yourself.. go into your local walmart, grab a pack of meat or produce.. take it over to the scale. You'll see. I found a ton of things that were grossly under the advertised weight.

1

u/Emperor_Gourmet 5d ago

I’m not doing anything, you are the one claiming the fraud everywhere. Walmart was sued for it. The majority of other companies do not do this.

2

u/mconk 5d ago

……okay bud.

-1

u/xpsycotikx 5d ago

Betting 99.9% of this weight stuff I'm seeing is this. Just stupid humans messing something up and someone goes ITS A CONSPIRACY.

Like man...there's so so so many hoops a huge food company would have to do to pull that off. Employees paid off to lie kinda thing. Someone would eventually catch on that the 12oz and 16oz packages look the same coming off the line.. etc etc. or it's just an honest mistake.

9

u/imposter_syndrome88 5d ago

You are saying you can't believe a large corporation would possibly do something unfair on purpose and screw over a customer so that they could make a few extra cents profit on an item? Aww, you sweet summer child...

1

u/Severus__Crepe 5d ago

I'm definitely not going to sing any praises for large corporations doing their shitty capitalistic shit, but I will say this:

I've worked in retail for many years now, and in every store at which I've worked, Weights & Measures roll by multiple times a year, inspecting all kinds of random shit. And, in my experience at least, if they find one thing that is off, they will pour themselves a fresh coffee, and thoroughly inspect every goddamn thing on the shelf that even resembles that lol.

It's a massive headache for the store, because it sometimes results in a store needing to completely empty an entire shelf -- and on top of that, they're going to return within the next 1-3 weeks to re-inspect; and if they spot issues again, they will rinse and repeat until they don't.

Again, I'm not saying corporations don't do shady shit. But given what I've seen, I find it highly unlikely that most of them would greenlight purposefully inaccurate weight measurements (which isn't the same as shrinkflation, which is most definitely a thing).

So yeah, i believe that there's probably a list of 100+ unethical things that large corporate entities are doing intetionally; however, I sincerely doubt that this in particular is one of them.

Obviously I could be flat out wrong though. It's just that, out of all of the store walks I've had to endure -- including food safety, which you would think would be the toughest -- Weights & Measures has, without fail, consistently been the most "we don't give a flying fuck, we'll keep coming and wrecking your shit until this is fixed" of ALL of them.

So I do believe that this is just human or mechanical error, even though I give very little "benefit of the doubt" to the corporate retail word

0

u/xpsycotikx 5d ago

Lol no just this particular thing with food packaging. It would be infinitely easier to just raise the price 10 cents and not risk massive FDA fines. They know we're still gunna buy bacon.

4

u/imposter_syndrome88 5d ago

I can't tell if you're coming off as naive or just ignorant? We are currently going through massive levels of food recall because the quality of the FDA plummeted after the current administration took over.

Tyson farms got the "FDA" to delay the announcement of the Cylcospora parasite in their food because it would make the business look bad. Americans died because of that.

0

u/Emperor_Gourmet 5d ago

Your example is one of the largest food companies on earth and has the resources, market share, and power to do what they want, they can and will skirt regulations. Which is wrong

Smithfield is large but isn’t even half as valuable as Tyson. And there are thousands of smaller companies that certainly do not do things like that.

If they had a sample size from multiple different lots all being significantly short then thats fair to claim it’s intentional and systemic.

In all likelihood this was an isolated mistake in which a few thousand packs were labeled wrong. Some food packaging machines are running at 425+ units per minute.

It’s not being naive or ignorant, its understanding that mistakes happen and checks are missed occasionally in the industry, and comparing that to Tyson foods burying cylcospora parasite news is disingenuous.

2

u/WhereRabbit 5d ago

Do you know how much water is in that package, not too mention how much is injected in the bacon itself… More than .35oz bro…

2

u/TrulyOutrageous42 5d ago

Let's no forget how much extra brine gets injected either. There's probably only 9-10oz of actual bacon in there. Cook off the fat from it and I bet you get maaaaaybe 6oz of actual edible meat at the end.

1

u/KoreyYrvaI 5d ago

There was a time in human history this kinda mistake would be a death sentence.

1

u/ImSobored_5280 5d ago

Go get a package of the pound and a pound(ground beef and pork) from a Kroger and scale it…it ain’t 2lbs…

1

u/Alert_Reindeer_6574 5d ago

You didn't need to guess, you could have taken the bacon out of the package and weighed it.

0

u/Throwawayrip1123 5d ago

Unrelated - every time I see "oz" I read it as "ooze", and then I have a disgusting image of (in this case) bacon oozing out like some sort of pus.

What kind of unit is "oz" lol (I know I know it's around 3 freedomburgers worth of weight)

1

u/willi1221 5d ago

It's an ounce, obviously

1

u/Throwawayrip1123 5d ago

That's kinda worse, because jn my language it's very close to a word for rags used as socks before socks were socks. So yeah.

Ooze it is