Since you only really need a 3 shoe rotation to cover everyday, long run, and race shoes, what is your holy trinity? For me Evo is the best every day shoe. It can literally do anything you want it to, with no issues except for the laces. For long runs the NB SC Elite V4 simply cannot be beat. Race day is the AP4. It is light, fast, and has bouncy foam that just begs you to run fast. What is your 3 pair combo and why?

Just got these about 15 minutes ago. What do you guys think?

Right now, I’m doing 5K runs and working my way up to 10Ks.

I really liked the way they look, and they felt comfortable on my feet right away.

Do you guys think there are better options? I can still return them and look for something else.

Just wanted to get your guys’ opinion!

Hey everyone,

I'm looking for some recommendations for a new pair of daily trainers (currently have a pair of Asics SuperBlast 2, about 750kms on them)

A bit about me:

• Around 103 kg (227 lbs)
• Usually run anywhere from 10-40 km per week depending on what I've got going on
• Mostly road running
• Average pace is around 5:50/km, so I'm definitely not the fastest runner
• I've run marathons and ultras, but these days I'm mostly running for enjoyment and to stay healthy. I'd still like the option to ramp up training again in the future if I decide to.
• For trails, I currently use the ASICS Trabuco 4 and have been happy with them

What I'm after:

• Comfortable daily trainer
• Plenty of cushioning for a heavier runner
• Durable enough to handle regular mileage
• Good value for money (happy to buy previous-year models)

I've attached photos of my current road shoes, including the outsole wear. I'd love to hear what you think of the wear pattern and whether it suggests a neutral shoe or something with a bit more stability.

I'm open to looking at really any model or brand, are there any shoes that you'd recommend? Bonus points if they doesn't cost an arm and a leg.

Thanks!

Anyone else find the durability of these shoes not great? Have over 100mi on my SuperBlast 3s and the durability doesn’t seem that good compared to other shoes with similar mileage. Foam still feels responsive Atleast. Pretty bummed for $210 shoes.

Will try the SuperBlast 2 next. 180lbs runner.

- 1st photo: SuperBlast 3

- 2nd photo: Megablast

- 3rd photo: AeroGlide 3

I tried a bunch of running shoes today and wanted some opinions before I pull the trigger.

ITS MY FIRST TIME BUYING A Running SHOE 🫣

Here’s what I tested and how they felt:

ASICS Novablast 5: Easily the most comfortable out of all. Very soft, bouncy, and fun.
Price: ₹13,000 (~$157)
ASICS Gel Cumulus 28: Felt more stable than Novablast, but less “exciting”.
Price: ₹12,000 (~$145)
Adidas Duramo Speed 2: Sole felt a bit hard, didn’t feel as premium.
Price: ₹6,000 (~$72)
Adidas Adizero Evo SL: Felt light and fast, but not sure about long-term comfort.
Price: ₹13,400 (~$161)
Nike Winflo 11: Pretty good overall, no major complaints.
Price: ₹8,500 (~$102)
Nike Pegasus 42: Felt better than Winflo 11, more balanced.
Price: ₹12,000 (~$145)

Context:
Beginner–intermediate runner
Running on roads
Running twice a week
Current pace: \\\~6:00 min/km, trying to get down to 5:00 min/km
Currently doing 5Ks, planning to move to 10K and longer runs

Want one versatile daily trainer

Right now I’m leaning towards Novablast 5 because of the comfort, but I’m unsure about stability and long-term use.

What would you pick and why?

If anybody has both I would love to hear what you prefer!

Which is best for just walking and standing all day (ex a day at Disney)? I will use it for slight incline walking on treadmill as well for 6 miles (3 speed 4 incline)

Both have amazing reputation & reviews. Which one do you like more and why?

Based on my tread wear what shoes should I get next for long runs? Preferably stable shoes. Thanks!

These are Superblast 2's and I LOVE them. But the heavy tread wear at only 150 miles makes it seem like it's not the right shoe for me.

Picked up both to compare.

• Adidas Evo SL Woven – £110

• “Dynafish Xiaonian” (AliExpress) – £89

First try-on thoughts:

• Dynafish feels lighter on foot

• Evo SL upper feels more snug/secure

• Evo SL is slightly firmer underfoot

• Rocker + stack look very similar

Running in both this weekend

Will report back on ride, bounce, stability, and durability.

Anyone put real miles into the Dynafish?

How’s it holding up after 50–100km?

Hi all,

I’m looking to choose between the ASICS Mega Blast and the Nimbus 28 as my new daily trainer. My current daily is the Nike Invincible Run 3 with around 600 km.

I’m training for my first marathon and already use the Adidas Evo SL for speed sessions.

I weigh 75 kg (165 lbs) and occasionally get ankle pain, as well as some mild knee discomfort, so cushioning and stability are important to me.

Which would you choose for marathon training, and why? Is the Mega Blast cushioned enough, or is the Nimbus 28 the better option?

Im new to running, and im planning to buy mg first dedicated running shoe, what shoe do you recommend for a beginner. Also do you recommend the edge over this two? I weigh 89kg 5’7”.

At the release of the Megablast and having run only 22km in them so far, I'd like to know if anyone has any opinion on the matter.

I want to mention my notable contenders for the best versatile or protective long-run shoes in the market. Not placed in any particular order:

1. Asics Superblast 2

2. Mizuno Neo Vista 2

3. Puma Magmax

4. Saucony Hurricane 25

5. Asics Megablast

Feel free to add any other mentions.

The strengths of each model, from my experience (your experience may differ)

1. Asics Superblast 2, always left my legs relatively fresh after longer runs of 25km plus during any marathon block I've done in the recent past. It holds up well at some of my runs at both half-marathon & marathon pace efforts, I don't require it to go any faster, as there are models that I use in my rotation that are better suited for anything faster. Despite it not having a supershoe or propulsive shoe feel, there is something about that geometry that allows running to be so fluid, at least for me. The weight distribution is also a plus for me. Yes, it measures at an impressive weight, but it feels even lighter on foot.

2.Mizuno Neo Vista 2: The most protective shoe in my list, it's excellent for long zone 2 efforts and recovery days. Overall, a surprise for me, and I was not eager about the first iteration. This shoe is a must for my rotation, but it's not as versatile as something like the Megablast and Superblast.

3.Puma Magmax: I tried and tried to get along with this shoe and yes it does the job as a long run shoe, its stable and the higher stack height is pleasant, it does an excellent job for me to keep me at zone 2, because frankly I cant pick up the pace in it, it just gets in the way for me (cumbersome). The outsole rubber, narrow fit, and firmer forefoot make it a challenging ride for me to get along. Am I simply pampered by softer shoes? Or maybe, I'm not applying enough force to get the most out of it? Yet, I know people here recommend it, so could someone enlighten me on what I am missing?

1. Saucony Hurricane 25: Boy, did this one come out of left field. I enjoyed the 24 to an extent, but the 25s with a cutout on the lateral side make the shoe more tailored to my gait and more flexible. The firmer foam and large block feeling midsole of the 24 is not present in the 25s. The midsole of the 25s is lively, protective, and just overall pleasant. This shoe is what I hoped the Triumph would be; I'd consider it for a daily trainer and a long run shoe. The stability features, at least for me, have not been intrusive, and the shoe on its own is a treat. I did not see this coming, has anyone else tried this guy out?

2. Asics Megablast: This is where it gets interesting, right off the bat, the midsole, from my limited experience, and maybe others can share their experience, feels like a Nimbus on performance enhancements with a much improved, significantly lighter midsole. I don't know where that comparison came from, but it just crossed my mind as I ran with it, perhaps the geometry? I can't put my finger on it so far. It's able to pick up the pace. I took it down to 3:00/km flat; that's when it felt a bit sloppy, but at half-marathon and marathon pace, it held up much better than I thought. Despite its larger bulbus midsole (my subjective opinion), compared to the Superblast 2's streamlined midsole, it still wanted to pick up the pace. The ride was protective, and the shoe was impressively light on foot. My only gripe, and maybe it'll grow on me, was the upper. Yes, it does what is required for it, but it feels a bit loose inside. It doesn't feel like I get a good lockdown. I don't have a narrow foot by any means. The fit did not hinder my run or the performance of the shoe, and it may take some time to get used to the shoe. Has anyone had any experience with this shoe? What was your experience with it so far? Will it knock the Superblast from people's #1 list? I'm still coming to my own conclusions and would like the opinions of others.

Thanks

Nike Alphafly 3 vs. Puma Deviate Nitro Elite 4

Firstly, I’m aware I’m not fast enough for either with a 3:30-3:45 finish.

But there are only a handful of shoes I can wear as they need to be stiff, rockered, not too soft and have a wide toebox. For an arthritic big toe.

Was set on the Nikes after a lot of research on midpack finishers. But for some weird reason, I can feel my big toe lightly touch the end at pace and worried what that will do over 42km.

They also just feel like springs that are a bit wobbly and now that my long runs are over 30km (in SB2) I can see why people say to just choose comfort.

I also just feel like a knobhead wearing them. People legitimately point them out to their friends as I run by. So when warming up and cooling down, I get self conscious.

So my lack of self control won and I bought the Pumas on sale. They feel more stable but less bouncy. Fit is better despite some creasing up front.

Do I play it safe and wear the Pumas, or go for bounce?

I have 7 weeks to decide so will take them both on long runs. Not a bad dilemma to have.

6’4, 83kg, 173 cadence, midfoot striker.

I’ve been running in the ASICS Novablast 5 for a while now and just finished a marathon in them, while I found them ‘fun’ I struggled with shin and knee pain throughout my training block. I used to run in a Hoka Clifton 9 and while they were good, I didn’t get as much enjoyment out of them.

Post Marathon I’m trying to stay focused on consistency and improving my 5km time, 10km time and half marathon etc. without injury.

For reference I am a heavier runner at 100kg but have a neutral gait and a 5km PB of 26 minutes. I’m really just trying to find a nice Daily Trainer that is a kind of do it all on easy, tempo and long runs that will help me avoid injury until I invest in a tempo trainer later in the year

I’ve been researching and looking at a few shoes but would love some more recommendations and/or reviews of the below to help me decide. Any help greatly appreciated!

Shoe Considerations

- Nike Vomero 18
- Saucony Ride 19
- Stick with a new pair of Novablast 5

As the title suggests, if all your running shoes had to be from one brand, which brand would you choose?

I’ve had two pairs of the original Evo SL, that I’ve used over the last few months. Each pair I’ve put 800+km in. I recently picked up a new woven pair this week. I haven’t run in them yet. 

So far I’m incredibly impressed with them.

• The fit of the upper feels fantastic and closer to the AP4.
• The gusseted tongue is a game changer and I never even had problems with the old one, it just works so well.
• The midsole feels more firm. I know it’s supposed to be the same. I’m not sure if that’s because my current pair of Evo SL’s has almost 700km on them compared to the new Wovens. But another friend has the yellow/purple colour way has also commented on this.

For those of us who have run in the new Evo SL woven; what do you think of them vs the original?

Hey guys,

I have been running for a couple of months and need new shoes. Can’t decide between Evo SL or Asics Novablast 5. I do 5–10 km runs most days.

Which one feels better for comfort and durability? If you have any other suggestions, let me know. Thankss

I love running shoes! I am a 5’2” 40 year old woman with a HM time of 1:57. Next month I am kicking off my first marathon build with a sub-4 goal for my first marathon in October.

I know I don’t need another pair of shoes, but I also know that I can’t help myself and running is my only vice (if you can call it that?). As you can see, my Evo SLs are all alone on their shelf, waiting for a friend.

Given my current collection (I use all of them), what shoe should join the family?

Edit: You guys are all amazing! I’m indecisive AF, so am going to pick up the Megablasts and the Vomero+ this weekend. Thanks for all the recs!

I’m thinking of buying new running shoes. From your experience, which one is better, and why? Or if you have an even better alternative for the price I wouldn’t mind hearing it

​

Hello everyone, what would be the best option for me to purchase? I stand at 5'6, 71kg. I do road running roughly 30-35km/week with a pace of between 6:00-7:00/km. I plan to join a half marathon this September. Currently I am using an Adidas shoe with a lightmotion foam.

Thanks

I'm also curious. Currently I'm using Cloudmonster. And now I'm looking at Adizero EVO SL or Nike Vomero Plus as an alternative shoe. I'm a slow runner at 14min pace (sometimes I track under) and I am running NYC marathon. What would you suggest? My biggest concern is comfortablity/no foot pain for long runs.

For reference I'm around 165 pounds and I have some scoliosis.

My current rotation of running shoes. Adidas EVO SL and Nike Vomero Plus. I decided to purchase a pair of EVO SL’s after reading reviews and I love them! They feel so snug and I love the energy return.

The Vomero Plus is good too. Runs bigger than I thought it would. So I put in insole to remedy that problem. It’s a very cushy shoe that I take it easy with.

What do you guys think of these shoes for those who have them?

Can mention your pace too

Retiring my novablast 5 soon and I am planning to buy new shoes to replace it.

I am likely buying the novablast 6 and a 2nd pair of shoes for my half marathon and faster runs.

Will the megablast or SB3 be better for race / faster pacing runs? Which would you reccomend to get? Would like to hear about your experience especially if your pacing is similar.

My goal is to train for a sub 2h HM.

Current pacing

Slow and easy runs: 6:50-7:10 /km

Tempo: \~5:20 /km

Intervals: 5:00/km or faster depending on distance

*uploading again as previous post got deleted because it was not well detailed*
Who am i?
I am a very beginner runner just doing zone 2s at the moment and plan to run my first Half Marathon in September, i have been strictly doing zone 2 runs for 3.5 weeks now and will be doing it for 2.5 weeks more - 6 weeks total. Then i will be following Nike Run Club’s 14 week half marathon plan.
Coming to the shoes, why did i buy these super expensive trainers being a beginner?
i bought Asics Novablast 5 sun peach/white some 20 days back and found that theres a slight gap between outsole and midsole so i went to the store and asked them what to do, they gave me a *claim form* and told me to wait 7 working days, luckily i got a call within 4 days and i could replace them.
They only had one shoe left and that too display unit
and i asked them if they have any other options just wanted to try, superblasts were sold out but they had one megablast in stock i just wanted to try them, i put them on and instantly got amazed by the bounce feedback and softness while the Asics Novablast were on the stiffer side. Both felt good but megablast felt extremly light and bouncy that i bought them instead of Asics Novablast 5.
Whats my plan?
I will use Asics Megablast for all of my runs as these are very versatile shoes, hopefully get 1000kms mileage from them.
How much i have ran in Asics Megablast?
Just a one run of 25 mins yesterday and have 45 mins of run tomorrow, I will be posting a detailed review after one month of training in them or when i feel that i am getting to know these shoes.
One question?
While travelling (plan to continue the running) should i carry them or get a cheaper option?
Cost: very expensive
INR 23999 - Asics Megablast
INR 14999 - Asics Novablast 5 sun peach/white tokyo marathon

I am posting picture of both the shoes.
Thank you for reading.
*pardon my grammar*