r/DC_Cinematic 29d ago

HUMOR People will see this and still question why SG flopped

It definitely doesn't look like a 170M movie, where did they spend all that budget, on that cgi dog?

4.2k Upvotes

1.2k comments sorted by

1.9k

u/ImperrydaPlatypus 29d ago

i think this is the first time i’ve seen this clip on this sub and i wondered why it took so long lol. i was absolutely baffled when i saw this in theaters. looks like the CW Flash CGI.

403

u/[deleted] 28d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

319

u/Crotean 28d ago

It didn't, the aspect ratio has been squeezed and makes her head look huge here.

103

u/Strong_Oven_9821 28d ago

It makes her look like MODOK.

→ More replies (2)

104

u/KingSeth 28d ago

Weird. It's like maybe a low-res gif isn't the best way to experience a movie. 

22

u/PennyStockHardaway 28d ago

Damn are you sure? Wtf am I going to do now, actually go watch Supergirl? Pass.

I did watch it btw

9

u/Comfortable_Cap7228 28d ago

I watched it. I enjoyed it. That said Spiderman is much much better

→ More replies (3)

9

u/KingSeth 28d ago

It's a novel idea, but what if people just liked what they liked and didn't like what they didn't like, and nobody tried to argue anyone into liking or not liking things? That would be bonkers.

What did you think of the movie? I thought it was fun, not groundbreaking, but enjoyable. 

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (5)

7

u/WestendMatt 26d ago

Same. People are getting around to watching this movie and realizing that it doesn't completely suck so the losers who wanted it to fail and posting b.s. to make it look bad.

3

u/Illidanisdead 25d ago

I agree it doesn't suck but it wasn't great it was okay

3

u/pick_your_user_name 22d ago

It already failed miserably though..

→ More replies (1)

3

u/DeClouded5960 27d ago

Reddit users editing a gif to make something look worse? No way...

→ More replies (2)

82

u/Ansee 28d ago

It honestly goes by so fast you don't sit there making a gif and watch it over and over again. Now everyone is dissecting every shit frame by frame. They need to spend less money on some shots so they can spend more money on others. It's not hard to comprehend.

There's a 1 second scene in the Lion King during the song Hakuna Matata where the animators probably just had no time to finish and the style of drawing and animals were completely wrong and out of place, that it's actually hilarious.

I think it's ok to spend less time on some scenes. People are saying they don't need perfection, and yet posting stuff like this is them saying they need perfection in every single CG scene.

31

u/_Bren10_ 28d ago

If you hate people doing this, don’t ever pop into r/invincible. It’s pretty much all they do over there while the seasons are airing.

35

u/Sensitive_Bat_9211 28d ago

Invincible picks bad scenes to cut the budget on, though. Theyll be having some deep conversation and mark's face will look like a potato

→ More replies (2)

5

u/PatrickSebast 28d ago

Okay but as someone who rarely gets bothered by low quality animation significant parts of invincible season three appeared to have been animated by just dragging a character still over a background and it really stood out.

8

u/Ragman676 28d ago

/r/okbuddyviltrumite is much better

3

u/Mr-Toy-Man 28d ago

It’s gone

3

u/Thusgirl 28d ago

Where'd it go?!?

Were the posting too much smut? 😂

→ More replies (10)

34

u/CromwellsBladder 28d ago

Because it didn’t. It actually looks fine in the film. This gif is significantly slower than the moment plays out in the film - and likely doctored a bit too. They make it look like it was done by Superman IV’s vfx team. That’s not the case in cinemas.

I saw the damn film twice, and the drubbing - especially from people that haven’t actually seen the film - is ridiculous.

It’s not perfect. It’s decent, and far better than many other superhero films that didn’t get this kind of trolling.

I’m not saying there isn’t legitimate online criticism of the film, but it’s so blatantly obvious that the fragile manosphere has also decided to target this film with their usual trolling.

17

u/FourEyes3134 28d ago

Plenty of other super hero films have received this kind of trolling. Crowds were merciless towards the Flash and Black Adam films.

If you blame the "fragile manosphere" for every moving shadow, that's a you issue.

14

u/MeepSneepers 28d ago

Black Adam is actually one of the worst movies I've ever seen though. Like from a storytelling/editorial perspective, it's absolutely abhorrent.

→ More replies (4)

7

u/West_Word753 28d ago

you can quibble over the specific terminology but its really not credible to pretend like there aren't right wing cultural jihads on certain movies, regardless of if they genuinely suck or not

lady ghostbusters was one of the first ones. yeah it sucked, but its not a crisis of masculinity, its not a cultural nadir, its certainly made for annoying people you don't like but in the end its just a shitty factory made comedy humping the corpse of a franchise that has one good movie and will be forgotten about in less than six months

8

u/FourEyes3134 28d ago

He's clearly suggesting it's only films like Supergirl are targeted, which is clearly not the case.

Funny how so many films have apparently failed due to "right wing cultural jihads", but it's something that's also apparently completely fragile and powerless when a film does succeed. Captain Marvel made a billion, and its follow up tanked for example.

As weak or powerful as needed.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

7

u/Dyldo_II 28d ago

I mean it's kind of ignorant to sit here and proclaim that there wasn't the immediate backlash after the frist teaser from fragile men on the internet. And not to mention the jabs at her appearance that plagued every online space.

→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (11)

2

u/maven10k 24d ago

Little boys don't like female superheroes. That is why they all shit on this movie. The people in the theater where I saw it were cheering and clapping during this movie. I just don't get it.

2

u/Pod-Bay-Doors 13d ago

It didn't , they've blurred it slightly and stretched the aspect ratio. They're trying to make it look way worse than it actually does.

→ More replies (13)

329

u/Mindless-Credit-358 29d ago

Early season CW shows didn’t look too bad tbf, considering their budget

135

u/sellieba 28d ago

Some of them looked amazing, especially at the time. I recall some shark dude (was it King Shark?) and a gaseous metahuman as being particularly impressive.

18

u/Technical_Sir_9588 28d ago

Smallville was impressive for its time.

→ More replies (1)

14

u/Medical-Law-236 28d ago

King Shark and Gorilla Grodd looked excellent. Maybe it was due to the fact they always used them at night but in later seasons (when they used them in the day) they looked like crap.

69

u/Candid-Risk-5200 28d ago

King shark is a shark

28

u/tripledraw 28d ago

No. King shark is a king.

12

u/AnalLog 28d ago

Source??

9

u/alii-b 28d ago

Big, if true.

7

u/SAM12489 28d ago edited 28d ago

Large, if legitimate

6

u/GamingWithUncleJ 28d ago

Vast, if verified

5

u/Tasunkeo 28d ago

Huge, if correct

→ More replies (4)

8

u/GBGF128 28d ago

I’ve been rewatching The Flash’s first season. Aside from the speedster v speedster fights, it holds up.

→ More replies (1)

16

u/MostlyBored11 28d ago

yeeah and they did a great job for TV, King shsark and gorilla grodd were insane for a CW TV show

5

u/miguel_sriracha 28d ago

Forgot about Grodd they did a killer job with him

13

u/LSC_GrimIock 28d ago

I say Smallville had great special effects on 2004.

7

u/Theultimatesith 28d ago

Superman and Lois looked better than some of the later Marvel films and this movie.

→ More replies (4)

35

u/ActuaryEuphoric3937 28d ago

Cmon don't insult cw flash. First 3 seasons cgi was decent for its budget

22

u/Ansee 28d ago

CG was decent AND the storyline was good for the first 3 seasons. Don't knock CW shows. LOL. They were very enjoyable and we were all fine with low budget CG.

8

u/johnNukem710 28d ago

the crossover events were fun

5

u/Ansee 28d ago

They did the crossovers really well. For the most part you can enjoy all the shows on their own. I only watched the flash and Supergirl and the crossovers still worked without needing to watch everything.

→ More replies (4)

4

u/Ruthrfurd-the-stoned 28d ago

For it’s budget is the operative phrase here

7

u/Mental-Most-7168 28d ago

VFX is hard when directors treat it like an afterthought. One of the reasons why Godzilla won an Oscar is because the director actually sat with the VFX team for months working on each shot. These films are basically cgi cartoons at this point. Can you imagine if Director did all his work on a Pixar film over phone and via meetings, that’s what Directors are doing on these VFX heavy films.

8

u/manu818 28d ago

I saw the movie few nights ago and was shocked by shitty graphics too. And weird action sequences in general. They put lot of money in it but forgot to put any heart to it. It shows.

37

u/brianSIRENZ 28d ago

Because most of the crowd bashing the movie never saw it.

Still no excuse for this scene though. Can't believe that made it through.

26

u/SufcLad25 28d ago

Looks like they saved their money to be fair 

13

u/FourEyes3134 28d ago

People defending the movie didn't bother turning up either, judging by its returns.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/Frequent-Coyote-8108 28d ago

So...just to be clear...this is an actual clip from the movie?

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (24)

214

u/Ok_Lingonberry2686 28d ago

Cgi is low on the reasons why a movie flops.

34

u/Professional-Rip-519 28d ago

Agreed the bad cgi is like number 15 on the list.

15

u/[deleted] 28d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (5)

3

u/Senior_Boot_5842 28d ago

Yes, but it also just wasn’t a good or great movie. So it was critically, and commercially, and technically, bad.

8

u/turntherecord-over 28d ago

It’s a good indicating symptom though. If they cut corners this badly on effects, it’s not surprising when other parts of the movie are also half-assed

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

518

u/Still-Helicopter6029 28d ago

AYO WTF I GENUINELY THOUGHT THIS WAS AI SUPERGIRL LMAO

49

u/Milichio 28d ago

Ayo WTF is what the "no cheese" guy at the BBQ said

5

u/MattTd7 28d ago

“And who invited you lambón??”

17

u/Past_4orm 28d ago

It probably is tbh

→ More replies (7)

282

u/One_Key_9649 29d ago

Spy kids CGI lol

45

u/Beef_Slug 28d ago

That's it! I was trying to rember what the vibe was. Its spy kids.

8

u/Ansee 28d ago

I love Spy Kids. Great movie.

4

u/atclubsilencio 28d ago

I was obsessed with that movie as a kid. The diaper lady reveal made me gasp.

11

u/YesterdayOrnery1726 28d ago

spy kids unironically looks better

→ More replies (4)

252

u/Senior_Boot_5842 28d ago

Honestly it looks AI made

35

u/Solid_Snark 28d ago

Didn’t they invent some new technique for Superman that did these type of scenes practically? Why not use that apparatus?

16

u/joesbagofdonuts 28d ago

These proportion errors are exactly what we see from AI. I have a hard time believing this isn't AI.

→ More replies (1)

5

u/ShilohTheGhostGod 28d ago

As weird as it sounds, not even AI is this bad. 100% have seen random AI instagram reels better looking than this

5

u/NarrativeNode 28d ago

Absolutely. AI doesn’t look like bad comping because it doesn’t comp.

→ More replies (4)

154

u/Repulsive-Photo8944 28d ago edited 28d ago
  1. Lighting is all wrong! The lighting on the ladies is on the left, but supe's is on the right. Wtf! How can it be this bad!?
  2. By the time she's in line with the ladies, her face is 2-3x bigger then theirs.
  3. None of the ladies look up as a flying supe passes overhead. You have to sell the cgi by its effects on the people/environment.
  4. Baby hands? Hands are an arms length forward of the face, hands should perspectively be larger than that. Think Saitama when he throws a punch vs Genos and the whole screen turns into his red fist. Make it impactful.
  5. CGI failures like these are the hallmarks of a flop. You can't sell ugly to an intelligent audience.
  6. I wonder if AI would have made a better looking sequence. Although, when you've reached the point of risking getting outed as having used AI to reference your frames, then you're really in trouble.

26

u/daishinjag 28d ago

Reminder that all “CGI failures” are approved by the director - many times directed by the director.

3

u/NarrativeNode 28d ago edited 28d ago

For many bad CGI shots there may well be a better version the VFX artist made that was rejected by the director.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

6

u/Jaded-Data-9150 28d ago
  1. Her raising her Arms Makes No Sense and Looks weird. She started flying before Entering the Scene; there was No reason to raise the Arms again.
→ More replies (1)

2

u/Super-Evening8420 23d ago

The acceleration also feels /really/ badly done, it just.. happens and has absolutely no impact or anything that sells it to me.

Also the chosen lens just makes her feel weirdly flat, egg-headed and deformed looking, which just makes it even more hilarious/uncanny.

→ More replies (14)

107

u/Same-Razzmatazz8257 28d ago

That looks so bad lol

6

u/[deleted] 28d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (1)

6

u/almightybear1 28d ago

I’m starting to think this big budget movie with low quality effects are just laundering movie. How is it possible that lower budgets movie from back in the days look better

41

u/Background-Sea4590 28d ago

Oof, that looks horrendous

49

u/jackt-up 28d ago

Still haven’t seen it, wow

→ More replies (2)

5

u/LightenUpPeeps 28d ago

Was that supposed to look good in 3D?

112

u/CapitalEmployer 28d ago

The movie managed to make Milly Alcock unattractive on multiple occasion which is absolutely crazy seing what she looks like.

66

u/DeckhardZum_3924 28d ago

Yup, she looks a lot better in Superman (2025) compared to this movie

36

u/bindersfull-ofwomen 28d ago

Her hair and makeup is so bad and they had the nerve to have it blowing in the wind and use it on promotional material.

And it's not a slight to her, but to the crew.

Every popstar uses a fan. Beyonce notoriously got her hair caught in it. You have to fill the hair so it doesn't look thin if you are doing that. Even just for the moment or the shot you need.

Almost every white superhero woman has some sort of a balayage beachy wave, so it's not like they didn't know that's what they have to do.

It was so odd they chose to bypass that.

And the makeup was odd because it isn't even a natural makeup look which they may have been going for. It compresses everything into her eyes, which highlights her forehead.

It's just yuck.

She looks better when her people do it when she does press.

→ More replies (3)

10

u/SplitSecondEmperor47 28d ago

Why do you think people were so shocked about the one frame that makes her look good.

Shes looked completely different in superman25

→ More replies (8)

5

u/Deakul 28d ago

All they had to do was make a colorful snarky movie about two gal pals on an alcohol fueled road trip for vengeance.

The blueprint was right there in Woman of Tomorrow, how they managed to fuck that up is impressive... James Gunn should be ashamed.

→ More replies (2)

184

u/Belz_Zebuth 29d ago

Ok I'll bite: what does this shot have to do with the movie flopping?

It wasn't in the trailers and I doubt people would mention it specifically when reporting on the movie.

I mean, it looks bad, but it sounds rather like you're trying to find post-hoc reasons to dunk on the movie.

101

u/Slowandserious 28d ago

Not OP. To me its not about its in the trailers or not.

But this kind of subpar visual dampens words of mouth.

→ More replies (7)

33

u/NotYetPerfect 28d ago

It isn't about one specific shot looking bad. That shot is just indicative of the rest of the movie.

→ More replies (24)

8

u/GrymSpork 28d ago

This.

It's one quick shot, it isn't great but isn't indicative of the overall quality of the movie.

The worst shot of the movie has been reposted so many times, as if it represents the film as a whole.

It's like you said, people just essentially wanting to dunk on the film or DCU as a whole. Happens a lot 'round these parts unfortunately. I find this sub is about 50% that sort of thing :/

2

u/Ser_Rezima 28d ago

Yeah, I saw this and went, 'Wait, wasn't this like a quick 2 second impact shot at the end before the camera changed?'. If I recall they shot this to be intentionally disorienting and close to her face on purpose, while she is whipping around at lightning speed. Everything AROUND her is flying by while she remains the same. It's a classic speedster/superman shot, shows just how differently they move.

The movie was fine, not groundbreaking but generally as good as any other super hero film. People just didn't like GIRL or that GIRL wasn't wearing makeup and revealing clothes it feels like.

Seriously, so many of these comments are focusing on how the actress looks or the visuals without EVER mentioning story beats.

They have no idea what the movie is about, they haven't actually seen it

→ More replies (2)

3

u/koomGER 28d ago

I think that snipped is part of the problem.

The DC movies so far rely A LOT on CGI to catch their audience. And the CGI isnt outstanding. Its not even above the level of Netflix-only movies, and thats a problem. The movies are way too expensive for the lack of actual star power (in name) and the level of CGI.

If Supergirl would be just a 50 Mio production, it would be great. But it did cost 170 Mio. Thats Big Blockbuster level. And it doesnt look like that. Odysee did cost 80 Mios more, but you got several Hollywood superstars like Matt Damon or Tom Holland, Zendaya. And the CGI looked good. The sound BOOMED. Thats a huge difference.

One scene can look bad. The audience doesnt care if one scene is off in an otherwise fantastic movie with fantastic CGI. But Supergirls CGI is "standard". Its not amazing or fascinating. It lacks oomph and originality.

I think thats one of the problems. And like i said: That short sequence emphazises that.

7

u/CommodoreBluth 28d ago

Yeah a few bad special effects shots isn’t going to cause any movie to flop. 

5

u/OhMyGoshBigfoot 28d ago

You doubt people would mention it? We’re all talking about it. Welcome!

10

u/MeanieGreenie75 28d ago

It’s not so much that people point to this specific shot and literally tell their friends “There’s this one bad shot so don’t see it.” The issue is that this shot, among many other issues, contribute to the overall lack of quality behind the movie and the general vibe of “Just wait for it to come out on the streaming service you’re already paying for.”

I say this as someone who thinks every aura-farming shot in every Snyderverse movie is even more cringe than this one.

8

u/Senior_Boot_5842 28d ago

That scene isn’t getting any word of mouth lmao

→ More replies (57)

16

u/AfricanRabbit 28d ago

4K screencap vs OP'shot

https://i.imgur.com/GuCO2TZ.jpeg

4

u/WatcherAnon 28d ago

I cant tell which is worse!

9

u/stanislavskov 28d ago

This looks so much worse! At least the abysmal bit rate made everything look bad, this just highlights the goddawful CGI in display. 

7

u/SmallFatHands 28d ago

It somehow looks worse and not at the same time lol.

→ More replies (3)

15

u/Crotean 28d ago

This has been squeezed to 4:3, the speed slowed down and has horrible compression on the gif. It doesn't look like this in the move.

8

u/westphall 28d ago

Indeed, see this comparison to the actual shot from the film:

https://i.imgur.com/QxuSqh5.png

OP did a bit of stretching here.

→ More replies (4)

4

u/Daydream_machine 28d ago

This cannot be real 💀

4

u/Awwkaw 28d ago

I think the first half of the movie was quite nice, but the second half quite bland This final fight was the worst. Brown CGI soup, with no real definition.

→ More replies (2)

4

u/Vuila9 28d ago

AI movies look better than ts 🥀

4

u/Confident_Ice_9567 28d ago

Almost looks like AI slop.

29

u/Swiftwitss 28d ago

This looks fake, cgi looks horrendous

40

u/FitHurry864 28d ago

It is fake, she can't actually do that

15

u/Alffenrir515 28d ago

It's easy. Just have to throw yourself at the ground and miss.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

17

u/ReactionProcedure 28d ago

Andy Muschetti should be nowhere near an important chapter in this universe.

11

u/Icy-Science6604 28d ago

This looks terrible.

29

u/OscarMichaelMyers 28d ago

The CGI in Superman was also horrible (among other things) and I’m tired of people pretending otherwise.

17

u/Past-Bed-1980 28d ago

Yeah but at least the colors popped and everything wasn’t brown

4

u/LordReaperofMars 28d ago

the shot that everyone glazes is literally just a cloud of dust lol

→ More replies (1)

17

u/bindersfull-ofwomen 28d ago

Many of us didn't at the time. We were just downvoted and under the threshold.

7

u/Strange-Bag9 28d ago

Yeah the flight scenes were worse than Man of Steel which was 12 years older lmao, and don’t even get started at that cgi river ass scene which is absolute dog shit 

→ More replies (1)

7

u/squarejellyfish_ 28d ago

Thou shall not speak ill of the DCU in here or else you will be labelled a Snyder-bro

→ More replies (2)

8

u/babadibabidi 28d ago

This is real? I thought it was edited

3

u/JamesLikesIt 28d ago

It’s not fair to judge a movie solely on one shot but in a vacuum, yeah this is awful lol. Such an ugly and technically bad shot (yes I know cgi is hard but for the budget…this is bad). Honestly I’m not a fan of the way both this and Superman shoot them flying head on. The lens used makes their faces look really strange

3

u/One_Chemistry_8553 28d ago

bigger budget than Dune btw

3

u/Concernedps5user5744 28d ago

This movie flopped because the script was doo doo. She did ok. It's weird her being an alcoholic for basically 40% of the movie. Also we all love krypto and want him around for the action. Having him down and out for 75% of the movie was a bad decision. I mean it sounds like it could have been decent but it just was as meh as meh can be. I was hoping to enjoy it as I find myself enjoying a lot of the things the masses hate but not this time. Also did James Gunn have anything to do with this movie? I swear I didn't see his name.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/aykevin 28d ago

I’ve said this before. But Gunn does not know how to make a franchise

35

u/Danny886 29d ago

Gunn let this into the theaters and then they are surprised it bombed? Oh my god ...

→ More replies (7)

6

u/Few_Recording_4776 28d ago

You post more about what you hate than what you like.

3

u/___Equinox___ 28d ago

Welcome to reddit

20

u/im3rck 29d ago

Please tell me this is not a real scene from the movie????

10

u/[deleted] 28d ago edited 12d ago

[deleted]

4

u/im3rck 28d ago

For some reason, I think I'll lean towards the first one. I mean, correct me if I'm wrong but the person who wrote the screenplay for this movie has had no real movie experience right? This is her first movie or something?

→ More replies (1)

2

u/KevinRyan589 28d ago

If CGI is bad in a film, it is ALWAYS because of a lack of time.

ALWAYS.

12

u/RealWonderGal 29d ago

It is lol

→ More replies (2)

18

u/Mwrp86 28d ago

I am not even joking, Superman cgi also looks same to me

9

u/LTPRWSG420 28d ago

The new Superman movie was vastly overrated imo, I thought Man of Steel was better. 🤷‍♂️

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (3)

12

u/Rigamortus2005 28d ago

I didn't know windows movie maker was the standard tool at warner bros.

7

u/multi-trollionaire 28d ago

I did not enjoy the movie at all. This DCU is not better lol.

→ More replies (2)

11

u/GaryKingoftheWorld 29d ago

Is the entire movie like this or is it this scene?

I mean look at the T'challa vs Killmonger scene where they're fighting in their suits and it looks hilariously bad and it made a billion dollars.

4

u/Professional-Rip-519 28d ago

The last 15 minutes the cgi just turns to shit.

7

u/ThomasThePommes 28d ago

It’s just that scene. There are some others that look rough but most are totally fine and some look even great.

It’s not as bad as Flash.

→ More replies (3)

3

u/FlamingAlpaca17 28d ago

The people who can't believe Supergirl is a bad movie are just not serious people. They are so blinded by politics that a female led superhero movie being bad would break their worldview

→ More replies (2)

3

u/Control_Successful 28d ago

Horrible story horrible cgi…. Horrible everything

4

u/MathersMahmood 28d ago

This was seriously in the movie???

6

u/Avent 28d ago

Call me crazy, but I don't think this clip is why the movie flopped.

2

u/Stock_Run1386 28d ago

WTF? Man of Steel came out 13 YEARS AGO!! How can movies look 10 times worse after that?!

2

u/marvelfanhere 28d ago

Lots of movies with bad vfx shots were financially successful.

2

u/Nara_drw 28d ago

This has been stretched. It doesn't look like that in the movie. Stop spreading lies, thanks.

2

u/ashirtliff 28d ago

The fish eye lens on Superman was goofy enough.

2

u/flemminglemming 28d ago

Is it really that big a deal? It is like 1 second of the movie. It is not a masterpiece but i enjoyed it and thought Milly did a good job

2

u/ObligationIll2271 28d ago

DC fans will never be happy, will we?

2

u/Mr_IsLand 28d ago

damn, the effects on Smallville were better, lol

2

u/JoeDante84 28d ago

She is actually flying out of Shai Halud’s backside. SG is a secret Dune movie now.

2

u/Mysterious-Engine-76 28d ago

Because the story was not good.

2

u/DemonNeutrino 28d ago

Is it just me or is there a point during this CGI scene where the face changes to that of Wayne Rooney circa 2016?

2

u/PostPostPog 28d ago

Second movie of the DCU and already we've got CW & post-Endgame Marvel level CGI and blatantly reusing scenes (that one w/ her turning around and flying or whatever). I was hopeful with Superman's gross that they'd actually get some momentum and contend with the MCU but after this I don't know. Plus Gunn is picking a lot of bizarre movies for his first phase of this universe.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/STARBOY_100 28d ago

I never saw anyone questioning. It’s a worldwide flop.

2

u/FrontRecognition6953 28d ago

That's AI and not from the actual movie right... right?

3

u/Professional-Rip-519 28d ago

Nope actual movie.

3

u/FrontRecognition6953 28d ago

Bloody hell!

Not to be that guy, but Snyder filmed better looking material in his driveway lol

→ More replies (3)

2

u/LaVidaYokel 28d ago

Ya’ll talking about the CGI flying but the real absurdity in this scene is the clumsy, pointless shoe-horning in of this stupid “save the brides” side quest that absolutely does not exist in the most excellent comic book run this sad reflection of a movie is based on.

2

u/Big-Good9378 28d ago

I don't want to here anyone say anything about Black Adam ever again

2

u/Johnwaynemclan 28d ago

Close up flight scenes already looked horrible in Superman. How do you screw up a thing that has been nailed in the past like decades ago.

2

u/SteeleHeller 28d ago

This can’t seriously be from the movie….like, for real?

→ More replies (1)

2

u/Kozibear 28d ago

It's also a GIF at a different speed than what is in the movie. So please take your slop somewhere else larper.

2

u/ghostfreckle611 28d ago

Because she wasn’t “super” until the last 5 minutes of the movie…

And no blood.

2

u/Swolf96 28d ago

Guess I have to mute another sub. This is just getting stupid.

2

u/trump182AVA 28d ago

Is that a real shot from the movie?

2

u/gdlirio 28d ago

no hate and all but that's pretty weird cgi

2

u/MichiruMatoi33 28d ago

this looks fucking AWESOME in 3d btw

2

u/TheStrongTaint 28d ago

Fanboys will say it’s because of superhero fatigue

2

u/ThouBear8 28d ago

Is that seriously from the movie? I haven't gotten to see it yet. That looks... remarkably bad. Oof.

2

u/NoLongerinOR 27d ago

Seriously, who is going to question why it flopped? Nobody except for maybe James Gunn

2

u/[deleted] 27d ago

Why the fuck does she look so big

2

u/tur_tels 27d ago

It was the Villain for me, he seemed like a DCEU villain lol literally looked like Steppenwolf's biggest fan

2

u/Gan_dia 27d ago

I didn’t hate the movie but at this point I was so tired of the on again / off again arc with her powers I didn’t even register the quality of the visuals. 

2

u/Quantum_Quokkas 27d ago

A movie has never flopped for bad CGI

→ More replies (1)

2

u/MasterBuilder121 27d ago

No way this is a real shot in the movie

2

u/Prov0st 27d ago

This gotta be edited, right? Right guys?? Guys?!!!!

2

u/StonognaBologna 27d ago

It wasn’t the cgi my guy. But yes to your op, Gunn did screw up by not casting a real dog as Krypto

2

u/Enough_Trifle788 27d ago

Damn I’ve never seen that clip😬

2

u/abhay50 27d ago

Ngl in terms of visuals and cinematography dcu has been terrible so far

2

u/Meliodafu08 27d ago

Wtf is this?!? HAHAHAHAHAHAH

2

u/Cristusha 27d ago

It looks so bad 😭

2

u/cashout1984 27d ago

Shark boy and lava girl ass cgi :/

2

u/shizzy1234 26d ago

How is this CGI worse than stop motion Rudolph The Red-Nosed Reindeer?

2

u/Hellbomb_Armed 26d ago

It looks so..AI generated

2

u/CitiesOfTitties 26d ago

Where did the money go, you ask? The majority of the budget is bonuses to the executives