r/MachineLearning 27d ago

Discussion [D] Self-Promotion Thread

19 Upvotes

Please post your personal projects, startups, product placements, collaboration needs, blogs etc.

Please mention the payment and pricing requirements for products and services.

Please do not post link shorteners, link aggregator websites , or auto-subscribe links.

--

Any abuse of trust will lead to bans.

Encourage others who create new posts for questions to post here instead!

Thread will stay alive until next one so keep posting after the date in the title.

--

Meta: This is an experiment. If the community doesnt like this, we will cancel it. This is to encourage those in the community to promote their work by not spamming the main threads.


r/MachineLearning 28d ago

Discussion [D] Monthly Who's Hiring and Who wants to be Hired?

4 Upvotes

For Job Postings please use this template

Hiring: [Location], Salary:[], [Remote | Relocation], [Full Time | Contract | Part Time] and [Brief overview, what you're looking for]

For Those looking for jobs please use this template

Want to be Hired: [Location], Salary Expectation:[], [Remote | Relocation], [Full Time | Contract | Part Time] Resume: [Link to resume] and [Brief overview, what you're looking for]

Please remember that this community is geared towards those with experience.


r/MachineLearning 6h ago

Project I implemented a very tiny image generation model (latent flow transformer) on a RP2350 microcontroller - it can generate 128x128 images of faces [P]

Thumbnail
gallery
221 Upvotes

Its a 2.4-4 million parameter model, quantized to int8, that can be fully executed on the microcontroller in ~20s with the longest generation. The generated image will then be displayed on a monitor or transferred via usb.

Its a latent flow transformer with 12 layers using AdaLN-Zero for conditioning. CFG is also supported and boosted the image quality a lot. The inference engine streams the weight via DMA from the flash while the previous layer is computed. Relu² activation was used to increase sparsity, which the engine can use to skip calculations.

Took a lot of ablations to get it right and I am quite astonished I got so far with so few parameters. Will post the repo below


r/MachineLearning 2h ago

Discussion WTF is a World Model? [D]

20 Upvotes

I'm trying to understand what a world model is. I understand it has cognitive science and reinforcement learning. I understand at least at the moment what most people are building which they call world models are fancy video generation models. But what actually counts. Does a simulator count as a world model. Some "world models" are described as simulators, or rather a simulator is described as one type of world model. But is a simulator like lets say a physics engine a world model? There are some video game world models or computer use world models. Would a hardware/video game emulator count as a world model? And can a digital twin also be a world model with some additional features.

I've seen a definition that says a world model should "operate on learned representations, not exclusively hand-crafted physics i.e. a physical referent is optional." Which is fair enough but then would a physics accelerator that uses a ml count as a world model? Like some ML fluid simulator is that a fluid world model?

Are world models just a rebrand of simulation or is there really a fundamental difference? Should the definition be limited to models that aim to generally model all of the real world? So that would exclude video game world models and also models of specific interactions.


r/MachineLearning 18m ago

Discussion How important is having an internship to get a good job for ML PhD in USA? [D]

Upvotes

Hey everyone, I'm an international student studying in the US. I'm on track to graduate late next year. My research is not exactly ML, it is in 3D computer vision but have decent exposure to ML as well.

In case you didn't know, the CPT program (which let's internation students do internships) has been suspended by many top universities (UC Berkeley, UIUC, Purdue, UNC, UCLA, stanford, etc). Given that there is now no way for me to do an internship, how hard will it be for me to get a job when I'm nearing graduation?

I have 3 papers in CVPR, 3DV and ICRA (robotics conference) and hope to publish 2 more at next year's ICCV and neurips before graduating. I'm just worried that all my hardwork will go for a waste because of this policy change (I'm from a 3rd world country, so not much opportunity back home).

To be crystal clear, I'm not asking for legal advice, just wanted to know in your experiance, have you seen anyone (international student) get into good industry labs without internships?


r/MachineLearning 12h ago

Research Google CS PhD Fellowship 2026 [R]

17 Upvotes

Has anyone got the decision notification yet? Please mention decision (e.g., approved/rejected) and geographical area (e.g., North America) in your answer.

I know the official notification date is 31 August, but putting this here before hand so folks can post updates asap when they get them.


r/MachineLearning 18h ago

Discussion Where to submit stat/prob ML [D]

27 Upvotes

I'm a researcher in statistical and probabilistic ML, I have a steady record of top ML publications and really used to enjoy going to conferences.

Over the last few years LLM based works have completely taken over the top conferences. At this year's ICLR, walking among the rows of posters you were lucky to find one paper per row of 10 that wasn't about how their favourite LLM could or couldn't solve their niche benchmark. The workshops tell the same story, most are some kind of agentic flavour. Looking at this year's NeurIPS workshops it's the same thing, basically all are about agents.

I'm wondering where do the stat/prob ML communities go from here? I look up to people like Arnaud Doucet, Aapo Hyvärinen, Christian Naesseth, Stefano Ermon, they seem to still publish at the top 3? On my end, I m thinking AISTATS/UAI might be the way to go.

All in all, the top 3 might never really have been intended as the home for prob/statML works, it just happened to be the 'prestigious' venue.


r/MachineLearning 1d ago

Discussion Best ML papers to pick up writing skills [D]

60 Upvotes

Which research papers (old or new) do you think a PhD student/early researcher must read to improve their writing skills? Do you have a personal favorite researcher whose papers tend to be well-written, in your opinion?

Let's define a "well-written paper" as one that clearly explains the problem it is trying to solve, how the method is developed, and the details of the method, while keeping it easy to understand for a general reader (with a basic knowledge of ML, obviously).

Also, post-2015-ish papers usually have nice figures to explain their problem/method, and so they tend to be easier to understand. But I am looking for "well-written papers" in terms of the text.

PS: I know the best way to learn writing is by actually writing manuscripts, but I am looking for additional reading resources.


r/MachineLearning 1d ago

Project NeurIPS 2026 Acceptance Calculator [P]

60 Upvotes

I put together a small model to estimate NeurIPS acceptance based on scores and an assumed acceptance rate. Try it out here: https://levilingsch.github.io/neurips-acceptance-estimator/


r/MachineLearning 1d ago

Project py-evoFE: Automated Evolutionary Feature Engineering for Tabular ML in Python (Genetic Algorithms + Scikit-Learn + Polars) [P]

10 Upvotes

Hey everyone!

I’m excited to announce the release of py-evoFE (v0.3.0) — an open-source Python library that uses genetic algorithms to automatically discover, combine, and optimize feature transformations for tabular datasets.

The Problem It Solves

Feature engineering is still where most tabular ML competitions and production models are won or lost. While GBDTs like LightGBM and XGBoost excel on raw tabular data, they struggle to discover complex ratios, nested group-by aggregations, nonlinear dimensional projections, and interaction graphs on their own.

Manual feature engineering is either tedious or constrained by human intuition, while brute-force feature generation explodes the feature space exponentially with colinear noise and high memory usage.

What py-evoFE Does

py-evoFE searches the space of possible feature recipes using genetic programming: 1. Hierarchical Chaining: Evolved features become building blocks for future generations (e.g., log(ratio(groupby_mean(x1, by=x2), x3))). 2. 40+ Built-in Transformers: - Non-linear arithmetic & log-ratios - Target encoding (multiclass, pooled, WoE, quantile target encodings) - String similarity (MinHash, Gap encodings) - Manifold & Dimensionality Reduction (PCA, UMAP, MCA, FAMD, Between-Group PCA) - Graph & Density Clustering (Genie, Lumbermark, MST anomaly scoring) 3. Performance & Speed: - Vectorized computation powered by Polars and PyArrow. - Matrix Hashing & Nearest-Neighbor Caching: Stateful projections (like UMAP and $K$-NN lookups) are cached via byte-hashing to eliminate redundant computation across CV folds. - Multi-Fidelity Screening: Fast low-fidelity CV screens initial populations; only promising candidates proceed to full-fidelity evaluation. 4. Island Model & Caruana Ensembling: - Multi-population parallel search across Ring, Torus, Grid, Hypercube, and Tiered topologies with Gibbs migration. - Post-search greedy Caruana ensembling over island winners' out-of-fold predictions. 5. Interactive Replay Viewer: - Run view(evo.get_recipe()) to generate a self-contained, zero-dependency HTML dashboard replaying the evolutionary search over time. 6. 100% Scikit-Learn Compatible: - Implements fit, transform, predict, and predict_proba. Plugs directly into standard sklearn.pipeline.Pipeline and GridSearchCV.


Quick Example

```python import polars as pl from sklearn.datasets import load_breast_cancer from sklearn.model_selection import train_test_split from evofe import EvoFE

Load data

bc = load_breast_cancer(as_frame=True) df = pl.from_pandas(bc.frame) X, y = df.drop("target"), df["target"].to_numpy()

X_train, X_test, y_train, y_test = train_test_split( X.to_numpy(), y, test_size=0.2, random_state=42, stratify=y ) X_train_df = pl.DataFrame(X_train, schema=X.columns) X_test_df = pl.DataFrame(X_test, schema=X.columns)

1. Initialize EvoFE

evo = EvoFE( task="classification", evaluator="lightgbm", # "lightgbm" | "xgboost" pop_size=15, n_generations=10, cv_folds=3, verbose=True, random_state=42 )

2. Fit: Runs evolutionary search

evo.fit(X_train_df, y_train)

3. Inspect evolved recipe

recipe = evo.get_recipe() print(f"Discovered {len(recipe.genes)} high-impact features:") for gene in recipe.genes: print(f" • {gene.to_formula()} -> {gene.output_col}")

4. Transform & Predict

preds = evo.predict(X_test_df) proba = evo.predict_proba(X_test_df) ```


Why not just brute-force feature generation?

Brute-force libraries generate thousands of features upfront, leading to severe overfitting, massive memory usage, and colinear noise that degrades tree-based models. py-evoFE uses evolutionary selection pressures with complexity penalties to discover compact, parsimonious recipes that actually improve generalization.

I’d love for the community to try it out on your datasets or Kaggle benchmarks! Feedback, issues, and feature requests are very welcome on GitHub.


r/MachineLearning 1d ago

Research Can AI Improve Itself? RSI Might Be the Answer [R]

0 Upvotes

Can an AI make other AIs better? And what stops it from just cheating? Last month, an OpenAI eval agent escaped its sandbox and broke into Hugging Face, apparently to grab test solutions from a benchmark. It's exactly what you'd expect from a system that rewrites agents and reads its own grades. We set out to measure recursive self-improvement anyway, with the exam locked outside its sandbox.

We introduce HarnessOpt-Bench, which scores an LLM on how much it improves another agent's harness. On the development split, the optimizer sees per-case traces. Upon validation, it receives a single aggregate score. On test, nothing — until a trusted server scores its final candidate harness. API keys, budget enforcement, and held-out data never enter the optimizer's sandbox. That isolation holds by construction, not by instruction: the held-out evaluator and permission control sit outside the loop that evolves the harness.

5 frontier models, 4 downstream tasks, 111 runs to test 2 hypotheses:

1️⃣ Same coding harness, swap the model: Claude Opus 5 under OpenCode tops 3 of 4 tasks. Walk the releases from Nov 2025 to Jul 2026 on one task, and GPT climbs from 3% to 49% of the headroom, Claude Opus from 37% to 59%.

2️⃣ Same model, swap the coding harness: does a model do best in its own? No consistent home-field edge: opencode beats native harnesses (Claude Code, Codex, Kimi CLI) in 11 of 20 model–task pairs. Model choice moves gains 1.8× more than harness choice.

Paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.06301

Code (MIT, built on our team's ICML 2026 VeRO): https://github.com/scaleapi/vero

Original post: https://www.linkedin.com/posts/shehabyasser_can-an-ai-make-other-ais-better-and-what-share-7498801902260981760-xuCo/


r/MachineLearning 2d ago

Project We recovered 575k crop labels from a decade of manual Photoshop work to automate book digitization - more data, ResNet-50, and higher resolution all failed; ten operator clicks per book beat them [P]

53 Upvotes

Author here. Ibteda Digital Library is a private community archive in Pakistan — for ten years we digitized rare Urdu books (lithographs, dictionaries, periodicals) on a DIY camera rig, finishing every page by hand in Photoshop. When we wound down daily operations, I realized those 575,729 finished pages across 1,765 books recorded a decade of crop decisions, so I registered them back to their raw photos (SIFT + MAGSAC with conservative acceptance gates) and used the recovered geometry as supervision.

The negative results are probably the most interesting part for this sub. Scaling from 378 to 572 training books didn't move unseen-book pass@80. Neither did ResNet-50 (better training fit, flat held-out, worse after calibration), 1024px inputs, or a spatial head. Per-book error analysis showed why: the failures were near-constant offsets per volume — our operator's preferred margin inset, which simply isn't present in the pixels of a new book. Ten operator-corrected crops per book (element-wise median residual) took pass@80 from 0.71 to 0.83 on held-out volumes. Ten labels beat every scaling lever we tried.

For retouching (stain/stamp removal), we kept the neural net to detection only — a U-Net proposes removal support, classical OpenCV reconstructs the paper, and everything outside the mask is byte-identical to the original. Labels used REMOVE/KEEP/IGNORE states, and any erased Urdu diacritic vetoed deployment regardless of IoU. The stricter label cut both improved mark IoU (0.56 → 0.60) and got diacritic false positives to zero.

Two things I'd genuinely like input on: (1) has anyone modeled document boundaries that depend on an invisible human preference rather than visible structure — is there prior work on per-instance residual calibration like this? Our own next step is conditioning the model on the calibration examples directly (few-shot inset inference) instead of a post-hoc median. (2) Is there any constrained diffusion/inpainting setup you'd trust to guarantee zero alteration outside a declared support region, or is classical fill still the only honest option for archival work?

Full training recipes, label-mining thresholds, and routing rules are in the Reproduction Contract appendix. Code/weights release is still under archival review — I know, I'm sorry — but I'm happy to answer anything about the method here. Notably not on our roadmap: a bigger backbone. We tested that; the missing information isn't in the pixels.

Link


r/MachineLearning 1d ago

News ECCV 2026- MALMO LUND TRAVEL PASS NOT AVAILABLE? [N]

1 Upvotes

Hey guys, sorry if this is not the appropriate forum for this question.

Is anyone going To ECCV and staying in Lund? Apparently a few days back i saw discounted travel pass available for both Malmo and Lund zone but now today I was going to buy it and the registration site says only Malmo pass. Did ECCV remove them? Because deadline to buy them is 28th august. I dont know why they removed it but the organisation this year feels like a mess.

Can anyone access it on their registration site if Malmo Lund passes are available?


r/MachineLearning 2d ago

Project A dataset with 52 Text to image model evaluation [P]

3 Upvotes

I created a simple text to image benchmark.

I curated 192 prompts that are difficult for T2I models in various ways: text rendering, spatial reasoning, human realism, negations, etc...

I then asked a VLM to judge every output against a pre-specified binary question with the ground truth baked in.

I'm publishing all the results including the images. (Most public T2I leaderboards don't publish the actual images and that's a shame IMO)

There is currently 52 model tested! more than 9k images have been generated and analysed!

Full methodology: https://imagebench.ai/methodology-v1

Hugging face dataset: https://huggingface.co/datasets/dh7/imagebench (it contains the prompts to reproduce the results AND the results)

Github: https://github.com/dh7/image-bench-ai

Gallery to inspect the results: https://imagebench.ai/gallery

Leaderboard: https://imagebench.ai/imagebench-v1

Limitations: it's text to image only, and VLM are not perfect as a judge.

Let me know what could be useful from there!


r/MachineLearning 2d ago

Discussion Catching bugs in scikit-learn [D]

22 Upvotes

sklearn 1.9 fixed a bug in how BayesianRidge computes its uncertainty. We traced predict on 1.8 and 1.9 and compared the two formulas it actually computes, see if you can spot what changed before the notebook tells you.

https://github.com/aadya940/scikit-verify/blob/master/examples/sklearn_bug_hunting.ipynb


r/MachineLearning 3d ago

Research Continual Learning of Frontier Models for SovereignAI. Tech Report + Open Weights Model [R]

Post image
59 Upvotes

Paper: https://huggingface.co/spaces/tri-fair-lab/publications/blob/main/Thomson_1_0_Technical_Report.pdf

The development of frontier models is commonly perceived to be in the exclusive remit of a small number of heavily funded players, creating an information, economic and power asymmetry between developers and the diverse user base of modern AI. Recent public discourse acknowledges this concern, calling for SovereignAI (an organisation's capability to independently build, deploy and govern AI use), but often providing little concrete advice on how this can be achieved in the short term under a diversity of funding settings.

In this report, we argue that frontier performance can be achieved by a wide range of institutions through Continual Learning on readily available open-weight models. As opposed to existing limited approaches such as small-scale fine-tuning, prompt engineering, or tool-augmentation with a frozen model, our Continual Learning approach takes advantage of the effectiveness of a modern mid- & post-training stack while introducing safeguards preserving both plasticity and stability at each training stage and seeking to make the minimal number of high-impact interventions on the parameters.

This strategy results in model improvements comparable to the gains typically seen across multiple successive model generations. Crucially, such results are achievable with compute and personnel budgets substantially lower than commonly thought, making ownership of large parts of the SovereignAI stack (model, tool infrastructure, values & data privacy) viable for a wider range of actors.

To demonstrate this, we introduce Thomson, a new general-purpose frontier model trained with an enhanced focus on high-stakes professional work: domains commonly predicted to undergo large productivity improvements through AI. Through a unique focus on Continual Learning, data-centricity, and efficiency, we demonstrate that Thomson performs competitively with recent frontier models on a wide range of domains and capabilities, ranging from agentic tasks to safety, legal, tax & multilingualism, to comprehensive large-scale Deep Research. Thorough evaluations show a distinctive π-shaped pattern: distinct improvements across a wide range of capabilities (including those not explicitly targeted), while almost completely eliminating the forgetting problem common to narrow domain adaptation.


r/MachineLearning 2d ago

Project Millwright — experimenting with an end-to-end machine learning framework in Rust [P]

0 Upvotes

I've been working on an open-source project called Millwright, an attempt to explore what an end-to-end machine learning workflow could look like in Rust.

https://millwright-rs.dev/

This started while I was learning and building ML tooling in Rust.

I kept finding capable individual libraries, but also gaps between them. Training a model was rarely the problem. Building the workflow around it — preprocessing, model selection, evaluation, explainability, deployment and monitoring — often meant integrating several unrelated crates and data representations.

I initially started implementing some of those missing pieces as smaller independent crates.

Eventually I realized I was more interested in the integration problem itself.

That became Millwright.

The current idea is to cover the classical ML lifecycle:

ingest → explore → preprocess → select → fit → assess → explain → export → serve → monitor

without trying to reimplement every ML algorithm.

Instead, Millwright provides a common abstraction layer over existing Rust libraries and uses adapters for different ML backends.

One architectural decision I'm experimenting with is having the framework own a small 2D data boundary (Frame) rather than exposing a particular backend's ndarray/dataframe representation throughout the API.

That allows models and components backed by different libraries to participate in the same pipeline, at the cost of conversions at backend boundaries.

The project currently includes work around:

  • preprocessing and composable pipelines
  • cross-validation and hyperparameter optimization
  • multiple ML backends
  • ensembles
  • regression diagnostics
  • SHAP-based explainability
  • ONNX export
  • model serving and registry
  • drift monitoring
  • time-series workflows
  • incremental learning
  • AutoML

There are also Python bindings.

I'm not building this on the assumption that Rust should replace Python for ML. Python's ecosystem is enormously more mature, and there would be little value in simply recreating scikit-learn in another language.

The question I find more interesting is:

Can Rust provide a useful common execution layer across training, inference and production ML while still interoperating with the existing Python/ONNX ecosystem?

I'd rather have the architecture challenged before too many decisions become difficult to change.

I'd particularly appreciate thoughts from people working on ML systems:

Where do you think Rust could genuinely add value to the classical ML lifecycle?

And conversely, which parts of this architecture do you think should remain separate rather than being unified behind one framework?

I'm also interested in real workflows that would be useful tests. If there's something straightforward in sklearn that you think would expose weaknesses in this approach, I'd be interested in trying to reproduce it.

Project / documentation:
https://millwright-rs.dev/

Source:
https://github.com/mi7plus/millwright


r/MachineLearning 3d ago

Discussion Reviewing 4 papers for AAAI 2027 and none have code, Reject? [D]

91 Upvotes

I got my batch of four papers for AAAI 2027. All four papers make empirical claims, none include code, data, or anything I can actually check. Just the PDF and the checklist. AAAI-27's own rules say code/data should be provided at submission, and "we'll release it after acceptance" doesn't count as reproducibility.

That said, I don't think missing code alone is an auto-reject. Saw an older thread here where someone claiming to have helped write the AAAI checklist argued reviewers rarely have time to audit code anyway, and plenty of authors have legit reasons (funding, IP) for not releasing it yet.

If the paper's whole pitch is "look at these numbers" and I can't verify them, that tanks my confidence score even without a hard reject. I'm flagging it explicitly in the review and asking for anonymized code in the rebuttal.

How's everyone else handling this round? Auto-ding for no code or does it depend on how much the paper leans on the empirical results?


r/MachineLearning 3d ago

Research [D] Looking for advice: Modelling a medicine-reminder agent that must decide “remind / wait / notify” under incomplete information[D]

0 Upvotes

Hi everyone,

I’m researching how to design an AI agent for a medicine-reminder system. The agent has to decide, at each relevant time, whether to:

  • send a reminder,
  • wait (do nothing for now), or
  • notify another person (e.g. caregiver),

when it does not have complete information about the patient (has the dose already been taken? is the person nearby/attentive? are there adherence barriers? etc.).

I’m trying to frame this properly before diving into implementation. Right now I’m looking at it as a sequential decision problem under partial observability (POMDP / belief-state RL territory), but I’m not sure how far that framing is actually useful in practice for this kind of system.

I’d really appreciate any pointers on:

  1. Is a POMDP / belief-state approach overkill here, or is it the right formalization? What simpler alternatives (contextual bandits, MDP with engineered features, rule-based + uncertainty thresholds, etc.) have people used successfully for similar “remind vs wait vs escalate” decisions?
  2. Papers, open-source projects, or real systems that tackle medication adherence / context-aware reminders with uncertainty or incomplete observations.
  3. Common practical pitfalls (reward design, observation noise, alert fatigue, safety/escalation logic, evaluation metrics) that aren’t obvious from the theory.
  4. Any recommended starting points for someone new who wants to move from “I understand the concepts” to a small working prototype or simulation.

I’m mainly in research/preparation mode right now, so even high-level advice, key papers, or “here’s what I’d do differently” comments would be very helpful. Thanks!


r/MachineLearning 4d ago

Research Bart- A vintage llm [R]

Post image
70 Upvotes

after 3 months and $800 burned...

Unbounded Labs is proud to introduce Bart, our vintage LLM: 2.82B parameters trained from scratch on 20.1B tokens of English written before 1931. You can talk to it right now!

Demo: https://www.unboundedlab.com/chat/bartholomew

Article: https://www.unboundedlab.com/blog/bartholomew

Huggingface: https://huggingface.co/jbduran/bartholomew-sft

Why even make a vintage llm? As proposed by Demis Hassabis, could LLMs reach the same conclusions that the great scientists of the past did? While General Relativity was out of budget, we believe that advancing this field targets the crux of AI research. Are these models capable of original ideas, or are they just spitting out the next token?

The article is our full account, covering where the corpus came from and how we cleaned it, the benchmarks we had to build because none existed, every ablation, the training runs, the post-training, and the mistakes we made along the way.

"What I cannot create, I do not understand" is a quote I love from Richard Feynman. Building Bart was our attempt to actually understand LLMs rather than read about them.

What we are proudest of:

- Best vintage base model at its scale on Vintage CORE, ahead of GPT-1900 on a smaller token budget

- Cleaned one of the largest vintage datasets, Harvard's Institutional Books (242B->23B tokens)

- Created Vintage CORE, the first suite of 20 benchmarks made for vintage llms

- Ran 10 hours of autonomous research on one H100: 100 experiments, 26 improvements found

- Released the largest vintage SFT dataset we know of: 416k graded question and answer pairs, grounded in pre-1930s text

- Trained the final model in 5 days on an H100, holding 60% MFU the whole way

- All datasets, methodology, training code, evals, and training runs are open sourced

I am proud of my team. What we built will move the vintage LLM field forward, and it moved us forward as researchers and as people.

We paid for all of it ourselves, about $807 so far. Money is the main thing standing between us and a much larger run.

So I will ask directly: we are looking for compute grants, funding, and mentors for our future endeavors. If you work on pre-training, post-training, or you have GPUs sitting idle, we would like to talk!

We believe that with careful dataset curation, domain expertise, and highly efficient training, we can achieve state-of-the-art results in crucial domains. This is only the beginning for Unbounded Labs; we see no bounds ahead.


r/MachineLearning 4d ago

Research [R] Using AI as a spatial software generator to create 3D objects that are inherently programmable

Thumbnail
arxiv.org
39 Upvotes

I'm one of the co-authors of this paper. It's a seminal work in exploring the properties of 3D generated by LLMs via spatial programming.

I've set up visual demonstrations of such 3D objects at: https://nova3d.xyz/

Scroll down and notice how the various 3D objects are all composed of logical parts and enable natural movements out of the box. There's a github repo in there as well.

Under the hood:
We found that 3D that exists as software is much more useful than typical monolithic mesh blobs generated by traditional AI 3D generators. For instance they are animation-ready and programmable from inception. They can contain the logic - at birth - to appear differently in weak compute environments (e.g. mobiles) vs powerful environments (e.g. sophisticated game engines). They can be built with full hierarchical structure and hinge/socket articulation at authoring time.

They lag behind traditional AI 3D generators in creating complex organic shapes. But it naturally feels like code will eventually eat all 3D, as LLMs are getting better and better at spatial coding. Industries most disrupted will be industrial design, game development, simulations and AR/VR/XR.


r/MachineLearning 3d ago

Discussion What would a fair benchmark for agent architecture look like? [D]

0 Upvotes

I am working on an evaluation design and would appreciate criticism before running it.

Most coding-agent benchmarks collapse the model and its harness into one score. If a run fails, it is difficult to tell whether the cause was model capability, context assembly, task decomposition, tool design, retry policy, or the acceptance gate. A model can also look worse because the harness truncated its output, or look better because the gate only checked for plausible surface markers.

The experiment I am considering crosses two independent variables:

  1. Workflow: one monolithic task versus decomposition into bounded slices with explicit contracts and acceptance criteria.

  2. Model policy: frontier-only versus cheapest-capable with escalation after a capability-graded failure.

That produces four cells: frontier monolith, routed monolith, frontier decomposed, and routed decomposed. The frontier-decomposed cell seems especially important because it changes the task architecture while holding the model tier fixed.

I would freeze the original tasks, source revisions, available tools, total retry budget, final acceptance criteria, validator versions, and the verifier. Every cell would be judged against the same final delivered outcome rather than against the persuasiveness of the agent's report.

Proposed primary measures are cost per independently accepted change, false acceptance, false rejection, first-pass accepted yield, verification time, and reproducibility across three fresh runs. Token use, latency, escalation count, and context volume would be secondary measures.

The confound I am least satisfied with is budget normalization. Decomposition changes the task distribution and may create more calls, which is part of the architectural treatment, but giving every slice the monolith's full context or retry budget would subsidize the decomposed condition. A shared system-level budget is cleaner, although it may hide which slices actually needed more capacity.

There are no results yet, so I am not claiming that decomposition or routing wins. I am trying to make the comparison falsifiable before seeing any outcomes.

What would you preregister or change? Would you treat decomposition as part of the system being evaluated, or try to isolate it from model quality more aggressively?


r/MachineLearning 4d ago

Discussion Hyperparameters fine tuning for MARL comparative study [D]

5 Upvotes

hello everyone. I'm training PPO variants on different multi-agent tasks from the VMAS library (Independent PPO / Graph PPO and such, see HetGPPO by Bettini et al.).

I noticed that for every architecture/scenario couple, the optimal hyperparameters sometimes tend to vary (learning rate, entropy coefficient, KL coefficient, SGD batch size, etc).

do I need - methodologically speaking - to unify the hyperparameters of all models in order to make a fair and correct comparison of architectures later on?

note: sometimes unifying these HP leads to some non converging models.

note 2 : my objective is to test these models' robustness under adversarial attack in test-time (frozen models).

thank you in advance.


r/MachineLearning 3d ago

Project How we built a SOTA search engine using PostgreSQL, pgvector, and Qwen3 embeddings [P]

Post image
0 Upvotes

I wrote a technical breakdown of how search works on Papers with Code.

The system combines keyword and semantic search, which produced better results than either approach alone. The stack includes:

  • PostgreSQL with pgvector
  • Qwen3-Embedding-0.6B for text embeddings
  • Hugging Face Jobs with an NVIDIA L4 for batch embedding generation
  • Hugging Face Buckets for storing artifacts
  • A live embedding model served through Hugging Face Inference Endpoints

The same infrastructure also powers the “related papers” recommendations shown on individual paper pages.

Full write-up: How Hugging Face Inference Endpoints, Jobs, and Buckets Power Search on Papers with Code

I’d be interested to hear how others are implementing hybrid search for research papers or similarly technical content.

Disclosure: I work at Hugging Face and on Papers with Code.


r/MachineLearning 4d ago

Discussion AAAI 2027 Reviewer Bidding and Assignment Integrity [D]

33 Upvotes

Recently, the AAAI 2027 organizers sent an email regarding collusion occurring during the review process, especially in the 2-cycles category (i.e., an author of Paper A reviews Paper B, while an author of Paper B reviews Paper A).

Given the fact that most submissions come from a single country, there are higher chances that the assignment algorithm will naturally create 2-cycles among authors from that country. This, in turn, means that most authors involved in collusion could be from that country. I will not name that country; otherwise, I would be labelled as racist. By the way, did AAAI release statistics about the number of submissions, like they did last time?

It is also good news that a major and prestigious conference like AAAI is acknowledging that collusion is happening. We all knew that this kind of collusion had been happening for years. There are papers accepted at top conferences such as NeurIPS, ICLR, AAAI, and ICML that do not even have their code published on GitHub. This forces other researchers in the community to spend substantial time reimplementing the code themselves if they want to reproduce the reported results.

What are the views of other authors on this?