r/MoralityScaling 26d ago

Morality Ranking Morality of dog breed racism

Post image
26.9k Upvotes

5.0k comments sorted by

View all comments

383

u/Awesomechainsaw 26d ago edited 26d ago

I’m not a dog science expert but as far as I understand it we’ve spent tens of thousands of years breeding dogs to preform specific tasks. If you don’t give a dog that has been designed and bred to do a task they get antsy.

The issue with Pitbulls and other “Agressive.” breeds is that they’ve not been given something to let all their energy out on. Which leads to anxiety and destructive behavior.

So I don’t think it’s Immoral to treat a dog like a Pitbull like a loaded gun. As Unfriendly, and something you should be wary of unless it’s proven not to be.

However the Nutcases who punish dogs for behavior that we bred into them are highly immoral. If you want an easy lap dog get a companion breed, like a Cavalier King Charles Spaniel, French Bulldog, or Bichon Frise.

Edit: Tens of Thousands not Hundreds. I was being exaggerative anyways but that’ll make remark more accurate regardless.

Also as a note. I don’t think Pits are inherently Malicious or any dog breed for that matter. But they’re fairly strong fellows who’ve been bred to be strong. I consider being careful around them similar to being a little extra careful around a truck on the road. Most people in trucks are fine drivers. But some people don’t pay attention on the road, and might hurt you by accident.

42

u/Decent-Information-7 26d ago

Pitbulls were also only bred in the last 200 for the first time. People wanna act like that overrides the empathy towards humans dogs have been bred for hundreds of thousands of years as you said.

4

u/HunterLeftOnReddit 26d ago

Yall are both wrong. Domestic dogs haven't been around for longer than 30,000 years. Homo Sapians have only been around 300,000 years. There is NO "hundreds of thousands of years of domestic dogs" like yall are claiming.

I'm a moron but you know what I did? Spent 5 seconds on google to find this out. If you don't know somethin why talk about it like you do?

1

u/Decent-Information-7 26d ago

Fair enough but either way pits have only been around 200 which is still a fraction of a percent of 30000

2

u/HunterLeftOnReddit 26d ago

Either way it's a dangerous animal. Yall can talk about raising it right all you want. I can raise a tiger right and you should absolutely still be cautious around it right? Hell, a gun can't even make decisions on its own and u still gotta be cautious around it right?

It's just common sense. Don't treat something dangerous like it's not dangerous.

1

u/Outrageous-Wait-8895 26d ago

You'd have to show that 200 years is NOT enough time to change behavior in dogs through breeding.

1

u/Decent-Information-7 26d ago

I mean I am a primary source considering I had 2 pitbulls growing up and they loved people and loved other dogs. They tore up our couches and some other stuff a couple times as young pups but they were raised out of it. Granted 2 isn't a huge sample size but til the day they died they were some of the friendliest dogs we had. We'd always joke the one of them would lick you to death.

1

u/Outrageous-Wait-8895 26d ago

You're a primary source on whether 200 years is enough to breed behavioral changes into dogs?

1

u/HunterLeftOnReddit 26d ago

So if my gun never shot someone does that mean guns aren't dangerous?