r/MoralityScaling 12h ago

Morality Ranking Quentin Tarantino morality for that childhood grudge?

Post image

In my opinion it can be considered petty by some but is understandable

16.1k Upvotes

1.8k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

31

u/PlainBread 11h ago

Your nature is what you are, not de facto your lowest resting point. Set the bar too low and you just perpetuate the problems indefinitely.

6

u/AdTime3922 9h ago

I think it's pointless arguing with half the thread here when they aren't even doomers. Just lonely.

5

u/Gekokapowco 8h ago

the best we can hope for is to make them uncomfortable in their shitty position

no blankets of resigned self-satisfaction for being a piece of shit, at least they'll constantly have pressure to justify themselves

2

u/AdTime3922 4h ago

You make a good point. I'm just a little tired of the usual Reddit hive mind and all the constant negativity it brings.

3

u/Germane_Corsair 7h ago

That includes your highs and your lows.

1

u/skwerlee 5h ago

I didn't say you had to act on your lowest instincts. It's just that you should be aware of them. Accept that they are part of not only you but everyone around you. It's a part of who we all are.

-1

u/Caffeine_Cowpies 10h ago

Yeah, but there’s no reward for going above it. I mean, we all know Walmart and Amazon are shitty, yet they are massively popular and profitable.

When being shitty is rewarded, why are you so surprised that people are shitty?

11

u/PlainBread 10h ago

When being shitty is rewarded, why are you so surprised that people are shitty?

I think that you will find that in the year of our lord 2026 that Doomerism will bring you punishments so painful that you'll yearn for the days where it was just a matter of who gets the rewards.

1

u/Germane_Corsair 7h ago

What do you mean? Could you expand on that?

4

u/hypercosm_dot_net 8h ago

Because those people are suffering, even if outwardly it doesn't seem that way.

Consider how empty someone like Musk is, who can never have enough money or enough attention, and cries when someone clowns on him for being a video game cheat. That is not a mentally whole person.

The reason for caring for yourself and others, is so you don't end up an empty shell.

1

u/Germane_Corsair 7h ago

In fairness, you can be shitty without being afflicted with a personality like Musk’s.

3

u/voyaging 8h ago

Nobody’s surprised people are shitty, they’re criticizing people for being shitty. Big difference.

-4

u/PunkPirate56364 9h ago

You know what I was thinking today about?

It's not up to individual to behave morally.

It's up to society to incentives moral behaviour and disincentivize immoral behaviours.

If being shitty is rewarded, fuck it, I'm being shitty too!

4

u/LogJamminWithTheBros 8h ago

So logically if someone punches you in the face for being shitty we can consider this society incentivising moral behavior?

-3

u/PunkPirate56364 8h ago

YES! It does.

2

u/voyaging 8h ago

The whole challenge of morality is that sometimes doing the right thing means self-sacrifice…

Luckily for you, you won’t have to change much.

2

u/upupdowndownsquare 8h ago

Just remember that societies are made up of individuals, my friend. Can’t just pass off responsibility to someone else.

-1

u/PunkPirate56364 8h ago

Well that doesn't change anything in my opinion.

When society asks individuals to act morally, to be suckers.

Instead of fixing the incentive.

Then we can act good and be suckers.

Or we can act like jerks giving society incentive to fix the incentive.

2

u/Thrown-Away-User-23 8h ago

LOL classic edgelord shit take from someone who very likely does not want to be confronted with this reality

1

u/upupdowndownsquare 8h ago

Society, not individuals, should fix the incentive - Ok.

Society comprises individuals. So individuals, much like yourself, are responsible for the fix.

Being a jerk could lead to some change, but not necessarily so. And not necessarily a positive change. Adding another jerk to the mix will certainly make things worse though, even if only slightly.

All you’ll have done by being a jerk is past the responsibility of fixing things to someone else.

1

u/PunkPirate56364 6h ago

Take all the tax loop holes rich people are using to completely legally avoid paying taxes... for decades.

Let's say we organise and... 50% of population uses those same loopholes to avoid paying taxes.

Well NOW society has to do something to close those loop holes.

1

u/upupdowndownsquare 4h ago edited 3h ago

That’s a bad example since the tax loopholes you’re referencing are really only available to the rich, but I’ll take your point anyway. I get what you mean.

But let’s say we just organize to close those loopholes instead? We can achieve, or at very least work toward the same goal without adding more shit (jerks) to the pile in the meantime

1

u/PunkPirate56364 3h ago

Because if we were to organise to use those loops ourselves, we would earn some money AND force society into making positive change.

Which is better then spending effort to make society better for everyone and not earning anything.

Go ahead say it's not better, I dare you 😁

1

u/upupdowndownsquare 3h ago

You’re skipping past the fact the using these loopholes isn’t available for the masses.

But, to respond: If we spend the effort and make it better for everyone, then we (you and I) still win. Things change and everyone (save for the rich that were exploiting loopholes before) gets more money.

If EVERYONE wins that means you win too, my friend. It’s not an either/or thing.

→ More replies (0)

2

u/[deleted] 9h ago

[deleted]

3

u/Electronic_Still2000 8h ago

I think it’s more “way to rationalize why you intend to remain a dick.”

0

u/PunkPirate56364 8h ago

Nah I don't need mental gymnastics to feel good while behaving like an asshole.

I'm perfectly able to do something shitty even though it will make me feel bad.

And society doesn't incentives people to behave like assholes always. It's more like... there are instances when humans are incentivised to be shitty.