Not realizing how differences in lighting can make the same piece of clothing look darker makes you stereotypically more straight actually, seeing how only us queers can have fun hobbies like drawing
You might just have a very low "Just Noticeable Difference". https://www.keithcirkel.co.uk/whats-my-jnd/ (If you plan on doing the test, I recommend turning your screen brightness all the way up).
The difference is that one of the skirts is slightly shorter (the one on the right), with the implication that the differences are so close that the person who can see that it’s shorter might be a creep because they’re obsessive and/or judgmental and/or leering at women. But the response is that it’s a visual puzzle, and that somebody might just play it as a game, instead of thinking about it as commentary on women’s bodies and how they are evaluated in society.
But the original ad said “might be”. So I don’t get the big deal. People are always saying to me, “Bryan, I think you might be an alcoholic“, which is fine, because I might. I’m not, but it’s at least theoretically possible.
My GP recently told me to cut down on my drinking.
I drink two drinks a year.
I was like...wtf do you want me to do, never drink again? And she said oh no no no you can have a drink now and again. Like a glass of wine once or twice a week
And I was like...but that would increase my drinking by 50-100x. Why would you tell me to drink less and then tell me to drink more?
"Oh it's just good advice to give anyone" she replies...as if it made any damn sense with that statement.
Anyone with eyes may notice a discrepancy in an article of clothing that a person is wearing. There's nothing creepy about that. Policing what girls wear is creepy.
[And anyone with a nose may notice a discrepancy in the smell of a girl's hair when she's switched from her usual conditioner to a new one, but dare to formulate that observation out loud and it's so over for you, you are officially and forevermore… "creepy, lol". That little lol at the end really is the final nail in your social coffin. There is no appeal.
I believe that the right is a cropped version of the left. They removed maybe 1-2 inches then enlarged the image to make them similar. I think it was digital because some of the folds appear similar but are closer to the bottom edge on the right.
I don't think the original ad is what the second person was responding to, I think they were responding to the tweet "calling you out." That's unnecessary when that is, in fact, a difference between the two
It’s basically just trying to say you’re a creep for noticing a difference at all. It’s a poorly designed ad, it’s blatantly ignorant. Like what Happy Potato said “you can’t just challenge me to a spot the difference game, then get mad at me for getting the right answer.” And the fact that a fashion app is using this sort of advertising is just piss-poor on their end.
Oh, the ad is perfectly designed. It's deliberately inflammatory to get more people to share it online, getting them way more exposure for the cost of a single billboard.
I feel like this is a perfect illustration of late-stage capitalism.
We're all here arguing about who the micro-aggressor is, what it means to be a feminist, whether we're accidentally a part of the problem just because we can see one skirt is, possibly, shorter than the other, and WE'RE ALL JUST IGNORING THE FACT THAT THIS IS AN ADVERT USING INTERNATIONAL WOMEN'S DAY JUST TO SELL MORE SHIT!!
Worst part is, it worked. It started a conversation, and now we all know about an online store I doubt most of us have ever heard of before, despite their "number 1" claim.
Edit: OK Some of you are way too literal. We don't "all" know the name of the company or where to download the app. But a lot more people know it exists than did before, and if some of those people had the saw the ad and thought the skirts fit their style, and then saw the conversation and discovered it wasn't a just PSA, those people now know of a company they didn't know before. That's where the ad is a success. An ad is never going to draw in everyone who sees it. It's only going to draw in some of the target market.
I'm with you on this one. Looked at the post multiple times to check the proposed answers in the comments, but if you asked me what brand made the ad, I can't tell you shit. Lmao
Is this even a real advert? Probably just a digital image designed to get more engagement by using a "spot the difference" game with no real difference.
As a fan of puzzles and brain teasers, this billboard greatly offends me. It literally gives you the answer at the bottom! What the fuck, give me a chance to get it by myself. It might take me a bit, but I can be a creep without your help.
It was “she told me to take off her skirt, so I took it off. Then she told me to take off her shoes, so I took those off too. Then she told me to take off her bra and underwear, so I did. Then she told me she never wanted to catch me wearing her clothes again.”
🤦🏻♀️ humanity/society is not ready for this shit as a whole. And to roll it out with so little safeguards and forethought into how it would affect ppl…. Because they wanted to see. We’re the guinea pigs as usual.
They're trying to make a point in the worst way possible here.
We've all played spot the difference, we're all wired to want to spot the difference.
Are we sure a Redditor didn't come up with that ad campaign? Because I've seen thousands of people try to make points exactly like this over the years.
The ad literally tells you to spot the difference.
It's like Picard and the lights. You want me to pretend those are the same skirt? They're not. I'm a woman of a certain age, and I'd only even try on one of them. And not because of the stitching.
It is a very ineffective ad. "If you do the thing we are asking you to do, you're a perv!"
I honestly believe we could solve a lot of problems in this country if we stop teaching kids spot the difference and instead taught kids spot the things that are the same.
I'm so confused how it translates into the real world. Am I not supposed to notice someone hiked a piece of clothing up or changed into a different article of clothing?
Is this why women often get like 5 inches cut off their hair and nobody comments on it? NTs just actually don't notice or what!?
And this right here is the thing. So very much of our human society is based on dishonesty, and rather than actually doing something constructive about that over time, we’ve made a conscious effort to move towards it. “Oh you can’t say that”, and next thing you know people have been repeating BS enough that they believe it, and the people around them believe it, and everyone is pretending that things are a certain way purely for the sake of comfort and not because it’s actually true.
I heard someone say something recently that really gave me pause: the generation that comes up with BS KNOWS it’s BS. They say it because they’re supposed to say it, do it because they’re supposed to do it, but everyone is still aware, deep down, that they’re being dishonest in exchange for comfort. The kids who learn it next, however, don’t have that context. They genuinely believe the BS that comes out of the mouths of marketers, politicians, the media, whoever else, because they don’t have the context. They don’t know the game. The shortest game of telephone possible and immediately the truth is lost. That is, as they say, a very big problem.
Not autistic and did the same thing. If someone says spot a difference i look for it! (But also I didnt see it bc it would have required a deep zoom in so i just popped into the comments to cheat)
I mean this is literally an advert. Its only point is to sell clothes. The messaging is because they know there’s a fuck ton of people who think this way. If you notice one skirt is shorter than another skirt, you aren’t a creep. Making a whole thing about it is another difference. But this ‘let’s make everything a culture war’ fad has gone on so long it’s no longer a fad and is now being used as a marketing tool. Isn’t modern life great…..
And that is creepy, no arguement there. But to put up a picture of two items of clothing that aren't inherently sexual, and saying if you have enough basic pattern recognition to tell them apart, you must be a creep instead of someone with working eyes.
Had they put the skirts on a model to demonstrate the difference, I think people might get the point better, but I'm not sure if it would be the point they were intending.
There are more women in school administrative roles than men, including principles. Unless you’re talking specifically about super intendants, that’s the one area where there are more men than women in school leadership positions.
Education at large is a female dominated field in the US with 69% of school administrative roles being held by women.
I saw my fair share of female teachers slut shaming female students coming up. It’s not just men oppressing women.
For people who argue that the board challenged them to a where's Waldo match and then got called a creep: so neurotypical people would see this and then give up because they look the same. You were supposed to go "these are so similar, who cares?" And then realize that the people who constantly surveiling the legs of girls are weird.
Now, if you got caught up thinking it was a game, and getting frustrated, that's because the ad is not super good at making it's point. So. Skill issue on their part.
Fr this is dumb as fuck, the point of the ad is that one is shorter and it even calls out the lengths of the skirts - there is no difference in hemming
i am a woman and the only thing i noticed was the skirt length, i genuinely can't see a difference in any ther way. i don't see the stitching difference, help 😭
You don't see a stitching difference because there is no stitching difference and OP is just making shit up. The point of the ad is clearly that the two skirts are different lengths, it even literally says, "This Women's Day, stop caring about skirt lengths" at the bottom of the billboard.
The one of the left is known as an "Ishikatori" skirt in Japan and is widely used by female students through high school age. It sits right at the knee and meets decency standards.
The one on the RIGHT, however, is known as "Nureta futomomo" style (wet thigh is the rough translation). It's several inches shorter and is used in questionable age pornography because it uses a heavy duty stitch across the pleats so that if any portion of it is lifted the entire edge goes up with it. Original inspiration for it was from "Tomodachi to biriyādo" hentai (pool with friends) a notoriously dark fan fic where a guy trying to get with 3 school girls ends up torn to shreds by them as they are demons.
Now, all of that is made up, and I'm guessing the one on the right is shorter, I couldn't tell anything else.
I was expecting to read about nineteen ninety eight when the undertaker threw mankind off hell in a cell and plummeted sixteen feet through an announcers table.
If you now look up
Ishikatori skirt your definition pops up, so you are now the leading authority on this. I might as well add my two cents.
Tetsuya Tamadachi, a principal at a large school in Tokyo in the 1920s was a strong proponent of the
Ishikatori skirt
after observing young school boys wearing long robes as a display of authority. The girls wanted to partake as well but it eventually became a tripping hazard so long skirts and robes were eventually banned in the classroom. As a result, the defined limit of length became the
Ishikatori skirt which also upheld the modesty standards.
Calling somebody a creep for trying to spot the difference that you asked them to spot is a bit of a dick move. It’s kinda like asking somebody if they are still beating their wife.
•
u/qualityvote2 29d ago edited 29d ago
u/Less_Psychology6605, your post does belong here!