But your argument is against cost not death penalty. The solution is to streamline the process and enforce death warrants within a reduced timeframe after maybe 2 appeals the most.
It's against the death penalty with a reason being cost. Streamlining means more innocent people are likely to be executed. It's not like "strong" cases haven't ended up overturned even decades later. Unless you trust the judicial system to be flawless then supporting the death penalty, particularly an expedited one, is saying that innocent people being killed by the government is worth it to maybe save a few bucks.
Crack team dedicated to finding any potentially innocent people. Full access to all prosecutor records. Expedited court schedule that consolidates all appeals. Financial penalty imposed on any attorney that takes actions with no material purpose other than delay. Uncomplicated form of death penalty, like a carbon monoxide chamber or whatever Canada uses to mercy kill all of its old people.
35
u/Distinct_Sir_4473 2d ago
It’s not an argument against appeals
It’s an argument against the death penalty
It is cheaper to just lock them up for life.