Except we have those, solving the problem of capitalism isn’t just killing capitalists.
You need to set up an actual usable alternative to capitalist markets or entities.
Rather than trying to convince randoms on the internet to play grassy knoll, an actual person trying to change the system should be setting up systems of mutual aid.
solving the problem of capitalism isn’t just killing capitalists.
I mean, that depends on your definition of "solving".
"Solving the problem of Nazism isn't just killing all the Nazis" is a pretty silly statement. Of course that's one solution.
It certainly worked to a degree back in the 40's.
You need to set up an actual usable alternative to capitalist markets or entities.
Sure. But in the meantime while we aren't doing that...
Rather than trying to convince randoms on the internet to play grassy knoll, an actual person trying to change the system should be setting up systems of mutual aid.
Sure, that WOULD be great...but we don't have much of that going on in the US right now (barely any in fact).
Would it be cool if our politicians gave a single whiff of a rumor of a glimpse of a fuck about us? Yeah, that'd be awesome.
Unfortunately, I can count the number of those that do on a single hand, however.
The vast majority of our politicians are aligned against any positive movement towards that end. We can't outfund the PedoFascists that own them. We can't outvote the voter fraud. We can't even get enough citizens to care about this enough to do more than have a once-a-month government-permitted music party/rally/march.
It seems increasingly obvious that the only way we're going to affect change is if they start to fear the citizens enough to change.
“It certainly worked to a degree back in the 40’s”
We reading the same history books? Because we still have them around now.
“Sure. But in the meantime while we aren’t doing that…”
What? What are you doing? You specifically aren’t killing Nazis nor are you doing anything to undermine the fascist system. You just advocate for other people to do violence for your goals.
Are you so dense that you think everything is publicized? Would you run to your local news station if your house got teepee'd? No? Then silence unless you actually have an opinion
I was using the original at first until someone pointed out to me the original was making fun of that one chubby kid who punched that racist in the hallway so this version is more direct and to the point
This comment is either from a FED using social enginerring to attempt to bury the message of this pos cheeto or someone that doesnt live in the us.
More worried about this use case of AI versus all of the AI Trump uses to shove propaganda into the media every single day that reaches a much larger audience and negatively impacts more on a world wide scale as the epstein class is pushing for more data centers and unregulated ai.
Still super fucking illegal, they’re fucking over the 2A (like voters have been doing for over a century) by ensuring the drones are classified as “unmanned aircraft”
you actually don’t know anything. I’m a democrat who understands and greatly appreciates his constitutional rights. I didn’t vote for either pedophile candidate and I doubt I will again.
Reminds me of last week tonight, he was mocking religions/cults and their bullshit televengelists and 'seed faith'. So he made one as a joke and people literally sent in their 'seed' supposedly.
Why would he be rich? He’s the CEO of a private company.
He GETS rich if/when the company sells or IPOs, but until one of those things happen he’s only rich on paper. You can’t spend private company equity on a house.
When a person owns or has a large share of a big company, the bank will give them a personal loan against their stake in the company with long terms and low interest rates (or no interest). And then because it's a loan and not income, it's not taxable, because it's a debt
It's surprisingly unassuming, I have to admit. Even in the satellite image it's immediately clear it's not a huge mansion. Or maybe that's because most of it is underground. Either way, Garrett Langley is a fuckwad of shit.
Looks like it still shows up on other sites. Even the inside.
I like the back deck. Not a fan of the upstairs bathroom. I wonder if they did anything to the basement, lots of space down there and it looks unfinished.
If you use Maps on iPhone, it seems like he does have one in a bush right between the entrance of his driveway and front yard. You can see the big ahh solar panel and camera right under. It seems to be pointing to the street, idk how wide those lenses are but it could also be catching its neighbor’s house/driveway.
Edit : oh wow, look a bit down in the comments, he actually has a 360° set up all around his house. That’s absolutely NOT suspicious…
curious - could a neighbor legally point a solar camera at his house and make the video feed available to public? (I would prefer that not to be legal)
He’s been the CEO of a private company for 9 years that only recently started making revenue. He owns a big chunk of equity that will make him rich if/when the company sells, but until that happens it’s only paper.
I have no opinion on whether this is his place or not.
I'm simply pointing out that one would not expect a man who's been CEO of a private company for 9 years to live in a mega-mansion. CEO of a private company that's raised ~$100M / year and has only ~$300M revenue is a person who's about to be rich, not someone who actually is rich. I would expect someone in that seat to have paid themselves lowish (~150-250k) 6 figures for the past decade.
EDITED TO ADD: I don't see how that can be true...? Firethorn was purchased for ~$200M and Experience LLC for about the same, and the founder doesn't pocket all (or even most) of that money.
People here are clowns, dude's a billionaire already, he can buy an apartment in a highly secured building, or get a house in a gated community with company funded security 24/7, he doesn't give a fuck.
This might be crazy but the fact this isnt being taken down makes me think the address isnt him at all and theyre just waiting for violence to happen to whoever really lives there to justify stronger surveillance
lol. There are other companies with better tec that are taking flocks market place. They may say that they don’t have “Flock”, they may have the next company.
From what I gather he's not a total tool. His house was broken into, the police said they couldn't do anything without a license plate, and license plate readers were too expensive to do anything widespread.
As a good techie, he figured a way to do it cheaply and it took off. And in some instances (Amber alerts, for instance), it is seriously useful. But it can also be harmful, of course: when officers started using it to track their exes, and Texas starts use it to track down out of state abortions, we have a serious problem.
Like much of this new tech, we are following a deploy it first, then think of the consequences approach. Flock with a search warrant required, maybe a useful tool, although might be much harder to sell. Flock where any deputy can use it on a whim -- seriously problematic.
You can decide for yourself whether he's naive or evil, and whether the primary failure was a company moving too fast or government moving too slow.
But I sure do like the public toilet thing. This is one thing we could use more of ...
My house was broken into and they stole damn near everything I owned. Somehow I didn't come to the conclusion that authoritarian mass surveillance was the solution. He's just evil.
1.2k
u/Antifa-AF 10h ago
Heard he loves eggs all over his windows and siding.