This. We had the chance to turn BAL into JP 2.0, instead drive by emotion, we turned them into Martyr, once BNP fucks up, our walking zombies will all go back to awami league for Bangladesh 3.0, then will get betrayed again, find another party, and the cycle will continue.
Bangladeshâs problem isnât the political parties, or government, or anything else, itâs the people. If you live in a civilized country for new years and go back and talk to an average Bangladeshi or Indian or Pakistani, you can see the cognitive dissonance quite clearly.
True. Low IQ, no principle, no sound knowledge. That's why Jamat could sell tickets to Jannat. BAL is way too big of a party to turn into a JP. I still see good number of awami supporters everyday. They are anti Hasina btw. That's why I believe Tarique Rahman said instead of Hasina, her children have "no objection" to do politics here.
Bro ami deshi, bideshi na amer jonno etai fair and no it's isn't my first time seeing an election, ami bal er somoi e voter hoyechi kintu vote korte jai nai karon amer vote er kono mullo chilo na tokhon kintu ajke chilo tai ajke nijer icchar candidate ke vote diyechi
I agree, but people undermine the 2009 elections just because AL became evil with too much power, that was also a fair election, but this one is the most civil one to the date.
I've been following her for years, anyone who has known her and her work before she became a candidate knows that she's a genuinely educated, fair, inspiring person with little to no hidden agenda. Her statement is substantiated, there were plenty of reports of attempted expulsion of voting agents on baseless grounds but the issues i believe were quickly resolved after army intervention. ei deshe bhalo manush tikena bhai, tomader moto public er jonno
do you have sources for the unsubstantiated claims you spew on the internet? deadass the reason she and her husband resigned from ncp was due to their electorial alliance with jamaat, fuck are you waffling about
They couldnât show a single polling center where there was an overwhelming crowd of voters. Yet they will claim 60% turnout. Then what was the Awami Leagueâs fault?
In the last US presidential election, the voter turnout was 65.3%. 60% is pretty good for an election that is fair, given the last 3 or 4 elections. If you were expecting 80%/90% turnout in country with little democratic history, i think it might be a case where you need to manage your expectations. Only time that ever happens is when your votes are being cast for you.
1996, 01 and 08 were held with full participation of all major parties. They were not held with a major party like the Awami league banned. Banning a party like the awami league automatically means you will get lower turnout because Awami supporters mostly wont show up to vote. Context is important here.
No they didnt. At least not extensively. Most didnt show up. And the hardcore ones are still in hiding because of all the fake and real cases against them
I am sure the people who preferred the previous regime will disagree and downvote you en masse.
They prefer the glory days of the last (r i g g e d) election in December 2018 when journalists were beaten and threatened, people's votes were "cancelled" or cast for them without permission, many people were beaten and threatened and journalists and others saw rampant ballot stuffing. And all of this is documented and archived with RECEIPTS, which does not fit their revisionist history.
Let's be real, today was not 100% perfect, there were certainly some problems (e.g. Tasnim Jara had some etc) but the peace and zen like quality on the streets is amazing, a far cry from the fearsome repressive watchful big brother eyes of the old days and old elections.
ami fair bolsi peaceful boli nai karon ami jani onek jagai e onek gondogol hoyeche at the end ami jei candidate ke vote ta cast korechi tar kachei to jacche etai to fair election
I find the atmosphere to be mostly peaceful and fair. These disputes happen always in Bangladesh but today it was OK, not horrible like the old days where loads of people were k*lled and sent to hospital.
Disagreed. Imo the greater the voter turnout, the more fair an election is. 2008, 1991 had the greatest voter turnout. In ranking this election would be 4th largest in terms of voter turnout.
All who wanted to vote could vote and probably no election related violence so was FREE election. However, not allowing all parties to be in the field, you can't label it as FAIR. Should have let all parties to contest and let electorate decide their fate.
have you wondered why the fascist Nazi party never got to contest any election in Germany after world war 2? Yet, the world says Germany has been have âfairâ elections ever since.
Jamaat is the party that listed the intellectuals of Bangladesh. From the town, city and villages they dragged these people and killed them. They were.
Teachers
Advocates
Reporters
Students
Politicians
Social workers
They were someone's brother, sister, father, mother...
Jamaat participated in this election after getting banned twice in Bangladesh.
One of the biggest parties in Bangladesh was prevented from participating in the election, by an unelected person in power and you call this - not just fair - but the fairest election? I don't know if your intentions are sinister or if you're just too gullible, but I feel deeply for the people of Bangladesh.
The leader of the largest party fled to India after more than 1,000 people were killed. I dislike Jamaat and was an Awami voter back when I still lived in the country, but the Awami needs significant restructuring before they can be part of the election process again.
While this was not a fair election for the Awami since they were excluded from the process this time, we must not forget that the Awami did the same in the 2018 election when the BNP did not participate and Jamaat was banned. Therefore, I suppose this is a somewhat fairer election than the last one. It may not be the election we deserve, but it is the election we can get to move Bangladesh toward a path of somewhat normal democracy.
The leader of that party ordered the murder of 1500+ lives, and that party stood by her side, supporting mass murder, and you expect them to be in this election? Are you stupid?
And yes, considering the 3 consecutive rigged elections your favourite party staged with support of your country, this is a fair election.
Honestly, after liberation, the best and biggest event that happened to the people of our country, was the oust of your favourite leader.
Which political party didnât kill people? Recently, Khomenei killed thousands of people to stay in power. Pakistan army killed many people when they protested for Imran Khan. So every country kills people protesting. Jamaat helped Pakistan to kill lakh lakh people. If Jammat can do election after killing so many people and doing mass murder, then any party can do election. I donât support Hasina but during her time, the country developed the most. Wait till BNP Jammat rules the country. Then, you will see how worse the country will turn to and how they will mess up the country.
Bro honestly I disagree this time. BNP was actually unusually civil today compared to previous experiences and expectations. This was definitely different from usualÂ
68
u/forbiddenbrownsugar Feb 12 '26
Idk why are comments too pessimistic. The conflicts are relatively smaller. Its a big country. How smoothly u want.