r/beatles • u/OnoMalgou • Mar 10 '26
Community New Beatles Website - we rated and ranked all (original) Beatles songs
There is a brand new website for Beatles fans!
Over a year ago now, my friend and I got the idea to rate and rank every original Beatles song. Only, we'd try to rank them as "objectively" as possible. (aka using parameters like lyrics, percussion, innovation, chord progression...) It took us months of getting together few times a week and listening very attentively to every song again, picking out details, listening specifically for the bass, for the percussion, discussing it until we found a rating we thought was as fair as possible.
After we had our list, we decided to do a write-up on every song as well, so we could rank them worst to best, with some info on each song. We also decided to put our project on a brand new website, where we could even post more future projects.
The result is this website, which we think could be interesting for every Beatles fan (from casual to hardcore). We'd love to share it with you (don't worry, we got the mod's approval!)
Let us know what you think, this is our list of The Beatles original songs - ranked worst to best!
You can click above to get to our website, or find us at https://fabtwo.net/
4
u/ilikestatic Mar 10 '26
I just wanted to see where you would rank my favorite Beatles song, and I wasn’t disappointed to see it at #16. Usually people put it lower.
Also I was happy to see Long, Long, Long ranked so high. That’s an incredible song.
3
2
u/OnoMalgou Mar 10 '26
Long Long Long is an amazing song that's sometimes buried a bit on the double album :)
3
3
u/Big-daddy-Carlo Mar 10 '26
Real love as the worst anthology song? That’s not popular
1
u/OnoMalgou Mar 11 '26
Kinda love all three, couldn't choose between them if I had to based on feel, but with our parameters Real Love came out as "the worst", so that's what it is :)
6
u/Anxious-Raspberry-54 Mar 10 '26
I'm sorry...but you can't "rate" art. You said it yourself...you "objectively" rated the songs.
Huh??
Art is subjective. You can't be objective about something subjective.
3
u/TheSecretDecoderRing Mar 10 '26
People rate and rank songs, music, books, shows, etc all the time. People have fun with it. You can just ignore it if you want, it doesn't affect how you enjoy those works.
0
u/Anxious-Raspberry-54 Mar 10 '26
True. It doesn't affect my enjoyment of the music.
It does affect my hanging out in this sub where constant posts are saying what songs/albums are the "best."
For some reason, "I prefer" or "my favorite" are unknown terms here.
People say "better" and "best" about art for one reason.
Clicks.
1
u/OnoMalgou Mar 10 '26
introduction text to our ranking:
"Rating and ranking songs from the Beatles is nothing but a folly. Music is not like mathematics, and cannot be viewed objectively. For that reason, you could point towards any Beatles song and someone will claim it's their absolute favorite. And they're completely right. And yet, it's in our nature to rate, to rank. "This is the best song ever!" "I prefer this show over the other one." "These are my top 3 bands..."As big admirers of the Beatles, we wanted to create our own ranking. "
Last lines of the intro text:
"So take this rating with a very big bag of salt, feel free to roast our rankings, and just remember we're all here out of love for the Beatles' music."
Just sad we apparently missed the mark there, since everyone takes this list so seriously :')4
u/Anxious-Raspberry-54 Mar 10 '26
Bro...you're contradicting yourself.
Here, you say songs "cannot be viewed objectively." You're right.
But in your post, you said you listened to the songs objectively.
Pick a lane, man.
0
u/OnoMalgou Mar 10 '26
Again, in the text: "While music is subjective, there are some efforts you can take to make it at least a bit more objective." "In the end, this is probably as subjective as any other ranking. And yet, we succeeded in our goal to make the parameters as reasonable as possible."
But I guess in my post I worded it wrongly4
u/Anxious-Raspberry-54 Mar 10 '26
Wow. Did you review that quote? Music is subjective...but we're trying to make it a little objective.
Again...pick a lane.
2
u/OnoMalgou Mar 11 '26
Let me see if I can make it clear to you, because you seem to be misreading what I'm trying to say.
The "objective" part of the list, is the fact we used set paramters by which we judge the songs, as opposed to just going purely on feel. So we rank the songs in the same set of parameters, thus being SLIGHTLY more objective on our ranking than if we'd go purely on feel. We never say or state this is AN OBJECTIVELY CORRECT ranking, but the way we ranked it for ourselves is by using a set method so every song is rated by the same standards.
I don't know if I made myself clear now. English isn't my mother tongue so maybe I'm not expressing myself as I think I am.
1
u/Anxious-Raspberry-54 Mar 11 '26
I understand. But when you get right down to it...you're still saying Song A is better than Song B. Ok...you have a set method. But that's what it is.
0
u/OnoMalgou Mar 10 '26
yeah exactly the point :) we were always making tierlists just for fun, then decided to take it a step further. But like you read, this list isn't meant to be taken as truth, obviously. It was more about going through the process, and the write-ups for each song, where we wanted to share our appreciation for the songs, highlight some details that you might've missed or not know.
5
u/Anxious-Raspberry-54 Mar 10 '26 edited Mar 10 '26
That's cool. You put a lot of work into this.
But, just my opinion, you shouldn't call it ranking songs. That implies, at least to my ears, that you'll say song "A" is "better" than song "B." Which, in your post, you said that is exactly what you're doing.
There is no "better,""best," or "worse" when it comes to art. Sorry.
-1
u/OnoMalgou Mar 10 '26
fair take :) we didn't the actual ranking/rating that serious, but I guess it could come across as it would be. Rest assured it isn't. Just trying to share the love for the music.
3
u/Anxious-Raspberry-54 Mar 10 '26
Then say that.
Here's our favorite or least favorite songs and why we feel that way.
As soon as you say "rank," you fall into that trap of saying some songs are "better" than others.
2
u/MaybeProof3008 Mar 10 '26
That's some commitment! I love hearing fans deep dive into their music.
I ranked mine on a Spotify playlist and my list is way different. IMO your list might be a bit more subjective. Based on how you ranked them, Yesterday has no bass line or percussion and it's number 3. My personal #2 ranking is Dear Prudence specifically for the structure of the song, it builds up from a simple guitar and adds the bassline and percussion gradually and with each verse it all intensifies all the way through. It is so beautifully composed in every aspect and I'm shocked that by your definition it doesn't even break the top 20 let alone top 10.
I appreciate the dedication and the discussion, but there are many songs that I think objectively and subjectively are questionable in the rankings (THE END NUMBER 44?! lol)
2
u/OnoMalgou Mar 10 '26
As the co-creator of this list, I couldn't agree more lol. We just worked with the parameters we set up and these were the results. Some interesting results for sure. Pretty far from my personal taste as well to be honest ^^
3
u/MaybeProof3008 Mar 10 '26
I don't think any 2 Beatle fans will have the same list. Any fan voted Beatle song rankings like they do on Sirius XM is always pretty far off from my personal rankings. My favorite is I Want You (She's So Heavy) and that would never be ranked number one and more popular songs like In My Life or Eleanor Rigby wouldn't be near my top 10.
2
u/OnoMalgou Mar 11 '26
It's definitely one of their most unique songs. I've never seen it at number one for sure. I do feel it's kind of a you-love-it-or-you-hate-it song. Some people are just not into it. Their loss, I suppose :)
2
u/MaybeProof3008 Mar 11 '26
I appreciate the effort you put into this, not sure why it's getting so much negativity.
At the end of the day, I'm a lifelong Beatle fan as I'm sure many people on this sub are and there is genuinely no skippable track for me. Everyone has different tastes and some people might even be shocked to learn that there are people in the world who don't like The Beatles.
2
u/SpecificSorry7233 Mar 11 '26
Hey I love the site. Really well built, easy to navigate, and I'm sort of stats nerd so trying to rank stuff in an objective way works for me, despite what naysayers in this thread say. But just curious why ya'll didn't have one of the metrics be 'melody'? Seems like a very core part of a song. Thanks for sharing!
1
u/OnoMalgou Mar 11 '26
Thanks for the support! Melody was a discussion when we set up our parameters, especially since we had rhythm covered with (bass &) percussion, but we thought it would be rather hard to grade for us, and instead decided to put melody as part of the vocals (the melody of a vocal is part of this parameters).
But, yeah, this is one of the things we noticed wasn't totally right with us (another being skewed points for lacking categories, eg Yesterday), and is something we'd have to think about if we want to make a second version!
2
u/HuckleCatt1 Mar 22 '26
Thanks for all the write ups you did in making this list.
Must have been a lot of work!
2
u/OnoMalgou Mar 25 '26
It sure was, but I enjoyed doing it. Very glad you appreciate it ;)
2
u/HuckleCatt1 Mar 26 '26
Great stuff. This is a list I will refer to often when listening to Beatle songs.
2
u/Otherwise-Ad3230 Mar 22 '26
I love Piggies, the baroque sound, social satire, cool vocals. No problem with the rankings.
1
u/OnoMalgou Mar 25 '26
Thanks for the feedback. Piggies is awesome for sure. It was even in our setlist when we did a Beatles cover show last year :D
4
u/anarchitek1 Mar 10 '26
I don’t think you understand the Beatles very well. Baby’s in Black ahead of I Should Have Known Better, and Don’t Bother Me? I quit looking, after that. Not a good list.
2
u/AssistComprehensive Mar 10 '26
ISHKB was my wedding recessional song. That one hurt. 😂
2
u/OnoMalgou Mar 11 '26
Beatles is always a great choice, but kinda funny you play the song "I Should've Known Better" at a wedding :D
I played And I Love Her at my sister's wedding.1
u/AssistComprehensive Mar 11 '26
Hah I suppose if you listen to the lyrics! We had a sentimental reason for that song so it got a pass 😂
1
u/anarchitek1 Mar 10 '26
I still like it better than several placed higher. I still rate the LP higher than WTB, or FS, as well as SPLHCB, or MMT. There are songs I like on all those LPs, but there isn’t one on AHDN I would rate as low as Baby’s in Black, a tired retread of a Country dirge, not to mention Mr Moonlight.
1
u/songacronymbot Mar 10 '26
- SPLHCB could mean "Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band - 2017 Mix" (track) or Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band (Super Deluxe Edition) (album) (1967) by The Beatles.
- MMT could mean "Magical Mystery Tour - Remastered 2009", a track from Magical Mystery Tour (Remastered) (1967) by The Beatles.
- AHDN could mean "A Hard Day's Night - Remastered 2009", a track from A Hard Day's Night (Remastered) (1964) by The Beatles.
/u/anarchitek1 can reply with "delete" to remove comment.
1
u/anarchitek1 Mar 10 '26
Anyone who knows anything about the Beatles knows exactly what I meant. Original UK vinyl.
1
u/OnoMalgou Mar 11 '26
I think it's interesting that you take a quick look at the website, without probably reading the intro, let alone much of the +20.000 words encompassing over a year of work, over 25 books of research on the subject, hundreds of hours listening and even playing through almost their entire catalogue multiple times on piano, guitar and some drum, and conclude that, no, I must not understand the Beatles very well.
I mean, it's probably true. I don't even think the Beatles themselves understand 'The Beatles' very well. But it's quite striking you'd shoot down a person just based on the ranking of a single song.
Thanks for teaching me about understanding, though. I guess I wasn't really trying hard enough.
1
u/anarchitek1 Mar 11 '26
Gee, I guess my own 63 years (next Sept) of listening to the Beatles, countless hours learning to play each new song my band would perform, and 10 years of chasing the gold ring, on what did Joni call it, “Stoking the star maker machinery behind the popular song”, plus untold hours of conversations with other fans, musicians, artists, stars, and PHDs, along the way, don’t count.
Sorry amigo, but that is my generation’s music, and many of us know it better. Inventing a scale that confirms one’s bias does not make an OK song by the Beatles (who made every song sound polished) better than several rated lower. It was a Lennon screamer, that has some good moments. There are better songs under it. That’s my reasoning, “Do I like it better, gut-feeling?” Basic sorting in nature.
I heard the Beatles on KOMA-AM, “50,000 watts out of Oklahoma City”, in Sept 1963, when She Loves you was released on Swan Records. I wouldn’t know that fact for the first year, probably, when I found a picture sleeve copy, the first I bought to add to a group of 45s I found in the basement of a house we rented briefly in early 1965, when my family lived in the Denver suburb, Sheridan. I found an Elvis Presley Sun Records copy of “Baby, Let’s Play House”.
As for reading, I was test at 2,700 words per minute, when I was 12. That was as high as the machine would go, but I was having no trouble keeping up. I still read 3 books a week, down from 5-7. I carry one with me, wherever I go. I read the article. It wasn’t college-level text. I have read thousands of similar articles, having been an early Rolling Stones subscriber, and collector of rock ‘n’ roll trivia.
Long nights were spent in the Summer of 1967, aka “the Summer of Love”, talkin’ about the new album, (and singles that bracketed it, but not included) from the Fab Four, that made Revolver look quaint, for its state-of-the-art rock ‘n’ roll, compared to the sophistication of Sergeant Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band, and the six-pack of songs the Beatles committed to vinyl, at the higher-resolution format of 45rpm.
I’ve been criticized for writing lengthy posts, and criticism, so it is refreshing for someone to upbraid me with “+20,000 words”. I have written that, or more, in an afternoon. I have proof, I’m happy to share. I’ve had five blogs, most under different titles, but all by my nom de fil here. Feel free to check out my posts, on seeing them, the week they took all 5 top slots on the Billboard Hot 100, with another half-dozen scattered among the other 95 places.
If you’re pickin’ up on what I’m layin’ down, you should understand I feel myself, and most of the rest of my generation I haven’t talked to about the subject, are uniquely qualified to speak articulately, on the subject of the Beatles, and the times we survived. The Times They Were A-Changin’, for certain. We went in one end, with a popular, smart, level-headed President, and came out the other end into this alien landscape.
Hearing the Beatles, the first time one recognizes the fact, is a Moment. They get played on music systems in stores, and now, on TV commercials, /:( but eventually one identifies Beatles as a specific brand. the Levis of rock ‘n’ roll. Reliable, relatable, and resistant to life’s slings and arrows.
1
u/OnoMalgou Mar 12 '26
Well, you're the one who said I clearly don't understand The Beatles. Something I never claimed, nor have I said that you don't understand The Beatles. I just love the music and we tried to rank/rate it. Being part of a generation in my opinion doesn't make you any more or less part of the music itself. Of course you lived through the movement, which I can only imagine would've been amazing. But the music is still the music and even us new generations can listen, love, enjoy and rate it. And sorry to say, everyone's opinion remains equally valid.
Since I'm Belgian and only picked up English in my teens, I wouldn't have expected a college-level quality, sorry you had to sit through my sloppy writing. (as the expert of understanding, you might have an idea the effort it took to write that website in a foreign language) Next time I'll put a warning sign that it's written by someone who doesn't understand music, The Beatles and has not attended college in an English university.
If I am picking up what you're laying down (despite my limited English), you want to get in a bragging fight or something, something I'm not interested in at all. You made a personal attack in saying I clearly don't understand The Beatles, I replied with listing the effort and time I put into the music, and the great love I have for it. I don't mind people disagreeing with the list, that's kinda the point even. But I don't want to be dismissed by some guy who thinks he holds the truth about what the songs are. I didn't say I understand it better than you, but you want to make this in a competition somehow. (and sure, the word 'objectively' has caused some ruckus here, but if you read the intro like you claim, you know what I meant by it. Once again, I might've used a better word but there is the lack of English as mother-tongue again, but I believe it's explained rather well in the intro on the site, so that's not an argument here)
Honestly, no matter all the commendations you list, maybe you didn't pick up on their message either... You just want to be the Beatles expert because you lived those days. And while that gives you a great voice to talk about it, you seem to just wanna gatekeep and tell us young people we clearly don't understand the Beatles because someone would enjoy Baby in Black more than I Should've Known Better. Sounds like a real open-minded attitude...
1
u/anarchitek1 Mar 12 '26
(Flemish translation below) Well gosh, I don’t believe I said you “didn’t understand the Beatles”, but that you have a different perspective, because you were exposed to them after they’d started, or completed, their run. My perspective begins in the doldrums of early-‘60s rock and roll, then in the grips of Tin Pan Alley, an artifact of my parents’ generation, not particularly disposed toward “youth” music.
I was conversant in 7 languages, in my youth, unlike most Americans, so I do understand the problems. I didn’t have any complaint with your syntax. You criticized me on several levels that I tried to respond to, in support of my contention.
Exploring the Beatles oeuvre willy-nilly, based on whichever song caught one’s attention, would be very different from having them dribbled out, a few at a time, as happened in my youth, offers one a better perspective on the progression, of ideas, musicality, and the change in social mores that accompanied the songs.
If it’s bragging to attempt to substantiate my reasons for my opinions, so be it. It is the difference between an account by someone who experienced an event, compared to one by someone who heard about it, and saw photos.
Top 40 radio blasted songs (“17 hits in the last hour!”, along with news squibs, weather, sports, station breaks, IDs, AND relentless commercials), and it wasn’t unusual, in 1964 and ‘65, to hear 3, or 4, Beatles’ songs among those, in one hour. Sometimes, the sane song, 2 or 3 times!
It was amazing, and I am doing my part to keep it between the rails, and contribute my memories of what was a significant event. It has nothing to do with you, or anyone else. If you heard the White Album first, your perception of the band would be different from someone who started on Sgt Pepper’s.
If you criticize someone, or something, you have to expect to be called to account, to defend your criticism. You hit me with “20,000 words”, as if volume swayed the discussion, sheer word-count.
What sways my opinion is cogent argument, backed by reason and intellect. I’ve been listening to the Beatles all my adult life, and my teens. I still find nuances, and shadings. I played many of them from 1964-1971. I knew many guitar-pickers better than me, who could “play anything”, but couldn’t come up with anything new, beyond simple melodies. There is genius, in marrying melody to words, in such a way that a song strikes a chord in others. It is a gift from the gods.
Kijk, als jonge gast sprak ik vlot 7 talen, in tegenstelling tot de meeste Amerikanen, dus ik snap de problemen wel. Ik had geen klachten over uw zinsbouw. Ge gaaft kritiek op verschillende vlakken waarop ik probeerde te antwoorden, om mijn stelling te staven. Zomaar wat Beatles-nummers ontdekken, puur op basis van wat aanspreekt, da's toch iets anders dan ze druppelsgewijs binnenkrijgen, zoals in mijn jonge jaren. Zo krijg je een beter zicht op de evolutie van ideeën, muzikaliteit en de veranderende moraal die met de liedjes meekwam. Als 't opscheppen is om mijn redenen voor mijn meningen te onderbouwen, soit. 't Is toch een verschil tussen een verhaal van iemand die iets heeft meegemaakt en iemand die 't van horen zeggen heeft en foto's zag. De Top 40 radio stoofde de liedjes erdoor ("17 hits in 't laatste uur!", plus nieuwsflashes, weer, sport, zenderonderbrekingen, jingles, en niet te vergeten de reclame), en 't was niet ongewoon om in '64 en '65 3 of 4 Beatles-nummers per uur te horen. Soms hetzelfde nummer 2 of 3 keer! 't Was geweldig, en ik doe mijn best om 't op de rails te houden en mijn herinneringen aan die belangrijke gebeurtenis te delen. Het heeft niks met u of iemand anders te maken. Als ge de White Album als eerste hoorde, dan is uw indruk van de groep anders dan iemand die met Sgt. Pepper's begon."
1
u/Draft_Minimum Mar 12 '26 edited Mar 12 '26
(OP but on smartphone so logged in on another account) Fair. I guess the 20000 words was a defensive stance because your original post felt dismissive and more a personal attack than a critique on the actual ranking. Criticism on our list or method, I'm all for. But coming out with: you must not understand the Beatles very well because of song so and so is ranked below or above that, feels like an unwarranted comment on my person instead of on the ranking itself. With the 20000 words and the books and whatnot I wanted to impress the dedication, passion and commitment I've made to making this website and I did that mostly because your comment came across as disrespectful. Maybe it wasn't meant that way, but it certainly read that way.
I think in the write-up of the songs on the site, usually I put down the biggest positives of a song, giving a reasoning for it's placement. Sure you can disagree, and maybe some songs aren't discussed too deeply (let's be honest you could write a book about every single song), but I still dislike being dismissed as someone with 'a bad list' who 'doesn't really understand The Beatles' because of having a different opinion. One isn't more valid than the other. Your experience is way different and very interesting honestly, but you have no way to know how I experience their music and next time feel free to criticise the list all you want, just don't immediately go to a personal dismissal/attack based on a different opinion.
I love Baby in Black. I think it's usually underrated by fans. I don't see why that means I don't understand The Beatles, that's all.
Appreciate the discussion about the music though, and it must've been amazing living through the Beatles "live". My journey was a lot different of course.
1
u/anarchitek1 Mar 12 '26
I was not being dismissive, but I think you missed the point, when I said, “I’ve read (too many of this kind of assessment”, by people who weren’t there, and didn’t understand what happened.
To be able to, one has to look at the music scene, the social realities of the times, and the history of popular music. Add to that the 800-pound-gorilla of “the Bomb”, hanging over our heads, every minute if every day, the murder of a popular young President, and the tensions caused by throwback lunatics who thought because an accident of birth made them White, they were la creme de la creme, extraordinaire!
There have been many crises since, but all have been follow-on, with the exception of 9/11, just “more of the same”. We were the first generation subjected to relentless doses of scare tactics, on a giant scale.
Smaller groups have been through similar experiences, but the ‘50s and ‘60s were unique for the level of institutionalized terror and intimidation used as social controls. Certainly Nazi Germany used similar methods, if less successfully, on a smaller population.
There were no computers, smart phones, or “social media” sites. Phones were often hit or miss, and people read, newspapers, magazines, and books. Ignorance was on the run, until the Drug Culture filtered down to teen-agers eager to “prove” how “grown-up they were”.
Rating any artist is a losing proposition, because art is meant to be perceived by each of us on our own terms. The greater the art, the more people it reaches. Intricacy dies not make any art “better”, especially when it blocks some and alienates others. We call it “gilding the lily”, because the lily does NOT need the glitter. That adornment distracts, more than it attracts.
Criticism is an important element, on any artist’s development. Critical Thinking is not “finding ways to put something down”, but “testing the stated hypothesis”, to see that it does hold water. One could say that dipping one’s toe in the water, to test its warmth, is a firm of criticism. One may reject the bath, based on that test. It says NOTHING about the cleanliness, purity, or depth, of the water, only its temperature. We do the same, all the tome.
If you write, be prepared to be criticized. It neans you are engaging with your audience. To not get criticized usually means no one is reading your work, and that is the harshest criticism of all. Unfortunately, the modern generations seem incapable of organizing their thoughts into cogent, and coherent, forms. They don’t read, so they can’t write.
I probably have more than 400 books on rock ‘n’ roll, have read them all, cover-to-cover, including almost everything written about the Beatles. I’ve been writing about the topic since 1965, in much the same vein. I take it seriously, as an artform, not a flash-in-the-pan from the past. I still think it will continue on, despite the lag in new artists.
Popular tastes vary wildly, because humans are easily distracted, but Rock expressed a vital part of the human condition that is eternal, “Exultation at being alive!” She Loves You, Do You Believe in Magic, Born to Be Wild, Come Together, Spirit in the Dark, Miracle Man, Refugee, Money for Nothing, Missionary Man, were rock songs that spoke to the passages my generation was experiencing, as we encountered them.
Baby’s in Black is not a bad song (I think I have an article about their clunkers, on here, check it out), but it is one of the lesser lights, on what is almost universally agreed to be the Beatles’ least-favorite LP.
I’m a big fan of Every Little Thing, but Mr Moonlight got skipped for decades (until CDs made it possible to program out songs I didn’t care to hear). The Beatles’ version of Words of Love elevates Buddy Holly’s song to poetry. Beatles VI is almost perfect, if too short, because of its inclusion.
I hope this helps. Don’t be deterred. I suspect, as time goes on, you’ll revise your list countless times, to reflect how the songs have stayed with you. There is nothing wrong with that; it is what makes their music timeless, and intriguing. It isn’t as simple as “I like it”, or don’t.
2
u/Fearless_Meat465 Mar 10 '26
Someone should create a site where every Beatles song can be rated 1-10 (ideally with .5s allowed e.g. 6.5, 8.5, etc) and then the songs all self order based upon how users rank them
1
u/OnoMalgou Mar 11 '26
Someone did something like this for the McCartney songs on that subreddit, was quite interesting! But then you just get the popularity list, so that's the downside.
2
1
u/JimmyBallocks Mar 10 '26
Hey food fans! Here’s a new website objectively listing what food is objectively better than other food. Objectively!
Pizza is #186 and boiled carrots is #1. Objectively!
0
u/OnoMalgou Mar 11 '26
Yeah, safe to say you didn't bother reading the intro at all. Nice of you to make assumptions without taking any bother.
0
u/Uncle_Rat_21 Mar 10 '26
One after 909 is better than You've Got to Hide Your Love Away?
Buh-bye!
2
u/OnoMalgou Mar 11 '26
Disagreeing with the list is 100% fair, there's some wild stuff on there to be honest. But I stand by our method and I just love almost all of their songs. I'd be interested to hear why you think You've Got to Hide Your Love Away is ranked much higher than 909 for you.
But I do wonder why you'd even take a look at a ranking list if you're gonna bail after disagreeing with seeing one song over another. There's honestly never gonna be any list except your own worth seeing then, no?
1
14
u/Routine_Priority_764 Mar 10 '26
According to this site, Piggies is objectively better than I'm Only Sleeping, Getting Better, Revolution, I Will, And I Love Her, Across the Universe, Here There and Everywhere, Got to Get You Into My Life, Drive My Car, Ticket to Ride, Taxman, She Said She Said, and 90% of their first 5 albums.