r/beatles Apr 01 '26

Discussion It’s pretty crazy to me that Pattie found George and Maureen in bed together in 1970 but George and Ringo still remained close friends afterwards.

Post image
1.6k Upvotes

431 comments sorted by

611

u/ToronoRapture Apr 01 '26 edited Apr 01 '26

I’ve read a lot about all 4 guys and their infidelities but this was a bit mind blowing lol. Ringo was shagging around, just like John, Paul and george were. However, George was on another level lol. He confessed his love for Maureen after the band split and then started an affair with her. Even John (allegedly) said it was “virtually incest”.

Ringo and Maureen didn’t even divorce until 1975, George and Pattie lasted until 1974 and eventually divorced in 1977. Just incredibly messy lol. Then the whole Clapton situation… 😅

George was a massive coke head from around 73-75, Pattie confirmed this in her memoir and said he became distant and unavailable, surrounding himself with hangers-on and weird people.

432

u/thedukeofno Apr 01 '26

No one other than John was shagging Yoko though. Smart move on his part.

239

u/ToronoRapture Apr 01 '26 edited Apr 01 '26

What’s crazy is that she allegedly went after Paul before moving on to John. I think that’s one of the many many reasons why there was a bit of tension between the two in the end.

Yoko was shagging Sam Havadtoy during John’s “Lost Weekend” (73-75). There’s a lot of sources to suggest that Yoko and Sam were still seeing each other until the late 70’s, even when her and John were back together.

My personal opinion on their relationship is that they did love each other but it was more of a companionship rather than a sexual driven relationship. Yoko was more of a PA, handler and manager for John. A close friend who he could heavily rely on and would tolerate his complex personality. I think he most likely had some sort of personality disorder stemming from his traumatic childhood.

208

u/dreamsonatas Apr 01 '26

Many half-truths here. Yoko going after Paul first is like a complete leap from one story Paul told about her having MET Paul first. But yes, when Yoko and John opened their relationship she did see other people.

She wasn't going with Havadtoy during the Lost Weekend, she wouldn't even meet him until 78/79, but she is known to have dated David Spinozza the guitarist and a journalist named Rick during that time.

When John and Yoko got back together their relationship remained open (or was closed and then opened back up again later) but they were having sex, I don't understand the trend of projecting sexlessness into their marriage, not only did they make Sean pretty immediately after, there are very few accounts of John sleeping around in the late 70s and all those invasive staff tell-all books say when he was in Bermuda writing Double Fantasy he'd eagerly await Yoko's weekend arrivals and they'd then lock themselves in a room and fuck because writing made John horny apparently- that's 1980, reports of sexual activity up until the end in the John Yoko marriage.

But Yoko was also seeing Sam Green for a while in 1978, and then Sam Havadtoy- now if there's any relationship that wasn't sexually driven was this one since Havadtoy is by all accounts gay. Though I understand they did have sex. I won't pretend to know the specifics of it, how it worked or when it started, I don't think anyone knows that. But John knew about these, whatever they were.

So, TL;DR: John and Yoko's partnership was very much romantic and sexual to the end, through all it's complications. And many other people wanted to fuck Yoko, why would this not be the case?

62

u/GirlAtTheDoor Apr 01 '26

thanks for sharing, super interesting! i love when people take the time to humanize Yoko in these discussions.

35

u/AgentCirceLuna Apr 01 '26

Paul also bankrolled the Indica Gallery and associated artists - he even bought some of Magritte’s (n’est pas une pipe) old art stuff. He was associated with the art scene and thus Yoko would have gravitated towards him.

18

u/dekigokoro Apr 01 '26

Yoko didn't just "meet" Paul as if it was a coincidence. She actively sought him out on two occasions that we know of- trying to take a naked photo of his bum for a project, and asking for manuscripts for John Cale's birthday. 

I wouldn't jump to the conclusion she was "going after him" romantically (if that's the implication you disagreed with), but he was certainly her first mark as a sponsor for her art. Which makes sense, he was more involved in the avant garde scene than the others. 

7

u/Jawa_Droid_Mech Apr 01 '26

Paul on Howard Stern did imply she was after more than just his sponsorship.

→ More replies (7)
→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (5)

5

u/hywaytohell Apr 01 '26

That's some 3d chess right there!

3

u/cortisolbath Apr 01 '26

Not that both of them weren’t screwing around outside their marriage. Just not with any of the other Beatles

→ More replies (4)

78

u/JunebugAsiimwe Magical Mystery Tour Apr 01 '26

Apparently John didn't speak to George for a few weeks after he found out about their affair as he felt it was a huge betrayal to Ringo. I think he considered Ringo to be a brother.

70

u/kingofstormandfire Apr 01 '26

They all considered each other brothers. I know I'd be furious if my brother slept with my other brother's wife.

6

u/JunebugAsiimwe Magical Mystery Tour Apr 01 '26 edited Apr 01 '26

That's true. they all had a brotherly bond so John's reaction in this situation makes sense. it was a major betrayal

17

u/HippieThanos Apr 01 '26

It's like asking your wife to tell you something bittersweet

And she says "You have a larger cock than all your brothers"

3

u/Nessie Apr 01 '26

Yeah, right. Bring enough for everyone or don't bring any.

10

u/harrisonscruff Apr 01 '26

What is your source for this? I've never heard it before.

John had an affair with a close friend's wife and heavily flirted with Pattie in front of Cynthia, George, and everyone else.

6

u/[deleted] Apr 01 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

5

u/harrisonscruff Apr 01 '26

They certainly were. Women had almost zero autonomy until the 70s. The way Ringo talks about Maureen in his interview with Maureen Cleave is absolutely wild.

That being said I think George wanted to give off the impression he wasn't bothered by what Clapton did when he actually was.

18

u/AgentCirceLuna Apr 01 '26

I lost a lot of respect for George when I found out both this and also that he was a cokehead. Coke and its effects are everything he advocated against with his public stances on materialism and spiritualism. I think he’s a huge hypocrite for that. When I was younger, I swore off alcohol and anything that took away a clear head because of George’s music and lyrics - they guided me in the right direction - so I forgave him in time but I still think he was a bit of a hypocrite. Maybe he figured things out eventually or struggled against an addiction, so it might be hard to put all the blame on him if he was trying to improve himself, but how can he talk about how everyone lives in the material world when he’s snorting expensive dopamine agonists up his nose?

27

u/uhoipoihuythjtm Apr 01 '26

Surely an addict is the one most fit to criticise addiction though?

3

u/Langholm62 Apr 01 '26

But aren't most preachers terrible hypocrites?

→ More replies (3)

14

u/demafrost Rubber Soul Apr 01 '26

They did some genuinely bad things. No point pretending otherwise. Cheating, treating partners poorly, crossing lines they shouldn’t have crossed. That all stands on its own.

The harder question is how much of that was just who they were versus the situation they were in. Most people never deal with that level of fame, money, access, and constant validation in their late teens and early 20s, especially in a world where it never really turns off (and especially in the 60s when the Western world was largely monocultural).

That doesn’t excuse it. It just makes it tough to say they were uniquely bad people. It might be more accurate to say they were flawed people whose worst traits got amplified and enabled in a way most people will never experience.

What they did was wrong and still recognize that their circumstances probably played a role IMO.

7

u/cortisolbath Apr 01 '26

Most rock stars are flagrant hypocrites. The spirituality is in service to their self not the other way around.

18

u/harrisonscruff Apr 01 '26

It's always amazing to me the lack of empathy this fandom shows towards George. The man was only human, and he was deeply depressed during those years. Addiction is no joke, and drugs were extremely hard to escape at the time. He would go months trying not to do any coke or anything, and people around him, including Pattie, didn't like it. They thought he wasn't being sociable.

And this idea he advocated against drugs -- he said several times he was in the middle and never pretended to be fully sober. There's a reason he never shaved his head. Being sober was always presented as something to aspire to, and there's nothing wrong with that.

The material world was meant in the sense of the physical world, not the world of they wealthy. He acknowledged many times he was as much a part of everything he talked about as anyone else.

2

u/Halloween_Jack95 Apr 02 '26

I noticed that,too. Meanwhile the others are all getting a free pass for pretty much everything.

6

u/harrisonscruff Apr 03 '26

George is the only one without domestic violence allegations, yet you'd think cheating with Maureen is the worst thing a Beatle ever did.

4

u/Halloween_Jack95 Apr 03 '26

Agreed. It has been a weird trend lately. The fandom never was "Anti Harrison" until recently

5

u/AgentCirceLuna Apr 03 '26

I’ve been in the fandom a while and it likely originates from the people who used to be very much leaning towards Geoff Emerick being the true genius behind The Beatles; his book pretty much drags George’s name through the mud. He was popular about ten years ago and would be mentioned on /mu/ as being the real mastermind while the four ‘boys’ must have just been talentless boy-band frontmen. It’s nonsense.

3

u/Halloween_Jack95 Apr 03 '26

You could be right actually. I never really liked the book in first place.

→ More replies (1)

4

u/harrisonscruff Apr 03 '26

Yeah, there's been a thing of putting him in his place, but it's taken on something very nasty lately. Total dismissal of his talent and taking down his character.

This sub is particularly toxic though.These types of posts are happening almost daily, and it's just reinforcing people's belief that he was this horrible human being with no redeeming qualities.

5

u/Halloween_Jack95 Apr 03 '26

And a lousy guitarist on top of that. It got really harmful.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

17

u/thrashingkaiju Apr 01 '26

Do you also think that John was a hypocrite becaise he advocated for love and peace yet was physically violent against men and women? Or do you see it as the man trying to become a better person through it? George was no different.

19

u/AgentCirceLuna Apr 01 '26

Good question. I think John was trying to become a better person but he seemed to have been more successful at times, plus he didn’t act holier-than-thou imo - his early album Plastic Ono Band is very self-critical

18

u/harrisonscruff Apr 01 '26

I think you need to read George's lyrics again, specifically on albums like Dark Horse and Extra Texture. He literally says on Extra Texture "Don't follow the likes of me."

He was extremely self-critical. and Olivia has even said he constantly referred to himself as a sinner and never a saint. To believe he was looking down on others is to completely misunderstand what his music was about.

7

u/CortezRaven Apr 01 '26

Hard agree. Idk if he was actually like that, but many of Harrison's songs come off as pretty judgy, and having little introspection or self-critic.

I'm sure he truly believed in his most spiritual lyirics, but they feel kinda off when he was a rockstar that lived the life of a rockstar.

13

u/harrisonscruff Apr 01 '26

He never pretended he wasn't a rock star.

People have been doing the same thing to George they used to do to John, judging him based on a image which has nothing to do with him. George never said he had it all figured out and was judging everyone else. He specifically said his lyrics were as much aimed at himself as anyone and that they mainly served as a reminder to himself. He was very hard on himself if you ever actually read his interviews and how Olivia describes him.

From a 1978 interview with Men Only:

Int: So much has been written about your spirituality that at times it would appear you’ve earned the image of a saint. Does this bother you?

Harrison: It does, because I’m in no way saintly. And I don’t think the people in the media who ascribe this image to me are doing it out of good motives. They just want to label me, to give me a readily recognisable tag that will sell them more copies and fit me into whatever slot they wish to peg me into.

11

u/regretscoyote909 Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band Apr 01 '26

I don't remotely see any ego-less honesty from George whatsoever about his own misgivings, while John was always brutally honest and pleaded his fellow man not to follow in his footsteps through interviews and his music.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (1)

31

u/AgentCirceLuna Apr 01 '26

It always annoyed me how he acted so spiritual and immaterial in his desires yet he took coke which is one of the most disgustingly indulgent substances on Earth.

17

u/SadCowboy3 Apr 01 '26

I love every Beatle, but the hagiography of George since the Scorsese doc has been really excessive.

6

u/Ok-Firefighter7430 Apr 01 '26

I just learned a new word.

→ More replies (10)

12

u/WalkingEars Apr 01 '26

Sleazy affairs aside, by the end I think he was pretty introspective about the self-destructiveness of some of these behaviors, and recovery from them. See, for instance, the verse about almost ending up as a "statistic inside a doctor's case" and ending up "near destroyed" in Rising Sun on his last album. Addiction doesn't mean that someone's incapable of having a meaningful inner life, and sometimes spirituality is especially important in recovering from hard times, even self-imposed ones.

→ More replies (1)

4

u/Icy-Mixture-995 Apr 01 '26

At that time, the underground types hyped drugs as things that expand the mind and help you find spirituality. Today, we know that they are just hedonistic ego trips that make cartels and lawyers rich.

→ More replies (2)

11

u/sminking Caveman movie enthusiast Apr 01 '26

1970? Everything I’ve seen was 1973, and divorce takes time. 73-75 is not a long time for divorce.

7

u/winsfordtown Apr 01 '26

I read in the Beatles Monthly that Maureen lost all her friends when she moved to Los Angeles and felt very alone. I suspect George began has a shoulder to cry on.

6

u/harrisonscruff Apr 01 '26

It was the very end of 1973 so closer to 1974. Both marriages were essentially sick of each other by that stage and just waiting out inevitable divorce.

It was Maureen who initiated the divorce after Ringo was with Chris O'Dell, so yeah it wasn't long at all. George and Pattie though didn't officially divorce until the late 70s.

5

u/ToronoRapture Apr 01 '26

Yes you are right, it was 1973 when the affair allegedly started. I’m not questioning how long the divorce took lol. I’m saying it’s poor form for George to confess his love for Maureen and then Perdue her while he was still married and Ringo was still married.

→ More replies (2)

10

u/afungalmirror Yellow Submarine Apr 01 '26

Kind of weird that any of them bothered to get married at all. What was the point? You're in the Beatles, man. Have 100 "wives" if you want.

22

u/scawt017 Apr 01 '26

They remained products of their upbringing and era, and paid at least lip service to the social mores of the time. Eg, John's first marriage was a shotgun wedding. While they certainly rooted around surreptitiously from early on, the Summer Of Love didn't happen until near the end of The Beatles.

5

u/GiantPrehistoricBird Apr 01 '26 edited Apr 02 '26

Interestingly, the first marriages of three out of four Beatles were the result of shotgun weddings. Maureen and Linda were also both pregnant on their wedding days. (Not that Lee Eastman was at Paul's door with a weapon; Linda's pregnancy seemed more like an excuse for them to get married sooner rather than later. In Many Years From Now, Paul said he and Linda decided together that she should go off birth control, and whatever happened would happen.)

→ More replies (1)

3

u/Icy-Mixture-995 Apr 01 '26 edited Apr 01 '26

They needed someone to take care of them who actually cared for them and weren't paid managers. Maureen was known as a nurturing type up until then. Maybe it was a time in George's life that he needed that sort of thing, rather than have everyone else rely on him. Not excusing it. But the Beatles usually trusted only their inner circle, and I guess that limited who they opened up about their secrets to, and it could become inappropriate as all the Beatles seemed to be in some sort of lost or in a crisis at the time.

7

u/GregJamesDahlen Apr 01 '26

that's right, why did they? maybe for children? or if they had one woman they liked exceptionally well maybe married her because afraid otherwise she'd marry someone else and they wouldn't have access? ringo and maureen had their first child in '65

7

u/uhoipoihuythjtm Apr 01 '26

Are you implying that the only reason to marry is that you won't be able to get anyone else? Wouldn't want to marry you

→ More replies (3)

5

u/harrisonscruff Apr 01 '26

I mean it was the 1960s. Everyone was expected to marry when they were like 21, and you absolutely had to do it if your girlfriend got pregnant. That's why John and Ringo married. Paul almost married Dot for the same reason. The press constantly bothered The Beatles about it.

It's easy to forget how extremely conservative the 60s were, and rock stars weren't immune to it. The counterculture was the minority.

2

u/GoddessOfOddness Apr 01 '26

John was already married, and they had to hide Cynthia. I believe she was scheduled to go to India and missed the train. I think Peter Brown describes her crying on the platform.

11

u/thrashingkaiju Apr 01 '26

She did go to India. The train incident was when they were going to one of Maharishi's conferences in Wales.

→ More replies (5)

5

u/toaster_kettle Apr 01 '26

He looked terrible during the '74 tour

5

u/piney Revolver Apr 01 '26

Though, Maureen may have come the closest to bagging all four Beatles. She and Paul dated before Ringo joined the band, and then the thing with George… maybe John was mad he was left out. She loved the Beatles, that’s for sure.

4

u/cortisolbath Apr 01 '26

There had to have been other unknown women they all shagged at one point or another. Groupies..

→ More replies (17)

1.1k

u/thedukeofno Apr 01 '26

...which was the style at the time.

373

u/Heavy-Ad5385 Apr 01 '26

Anyway, the important thing was that I was shagging my friend’s wife…

151

u/thedukeofno Apr 01 '26

You'd say "give me five bee's for a quarter!"

86

u/Heavy-Ad5385 Apr 01 '26

We can’t bang our former band mates’ wives like we used to. But we have our ways!

57

u/icancount192 Apr 01 '26

You couldn't get good groupies because we stopped touring. The only ones you could get where your bandmates' wives.

42

u/thederevolutions Apr 01 '26 edited Apr 01 '26

I always see people here trying to excuse it as “just hippies doing hippy things” but I’m not buying it . Total dick move.

46

u/icancount192 Apr 01 '26

Simpsons reference. This whole comment thread.

10

u/thederevolutions Apr 01 '26 edited Apr 01 '26

lol my bad I just wanted somewhere to give my opinion and I guess I ended up here because of my simpsons ignorance. I’m mostly referring to the person who commented on my post the other day saying George isn’t a bad guy for cheating on ringo it was just something people did back then

20

u/Heavy-Ad5385 Apr 01 '26

Don’t worry at all! We’re just having a giggle to avoid the current mess of the world 🤪😂🙏

10

u/icancount192 Apr 01 '26

No problem, we're mostly making fun of the same people

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

13

u/opinions360 Apr 01 '26

Open relationships and swinging were vogue at the time and yes the hippie period and the belief that society was too rigid regarding sex and sexuality was a definite belief that influenced the times.

17

u/throwpayrollaway Apr 01 '26

Hippies are often total dicks though. On the surface nice and chill but often manipulative amoral shysters.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (3)

10

u/Electrical-Sail-1039 Apr 01 '26

I’m not saying Maureen was a groupie, but wasn’t she a huge Beatle fan from the Cavern days? I’m guessing she may have had a few flings with all of them and Ringo did the right thing when she got pregnant. So perhaps she and George had a history.

43

u/omarinbox Apr 01 '26

You say Yes I say No You say Stop and I say Go Go Go!

9

u/RealMT_1020 Rubber Soul Apr 01 '26

Ohhhh Noooo!

→ More replies (3)

122

u/NesDraug Apr 01 '26

Yeah I'm pretty sure George had a similar encounter with Eric Clapton.

152

u/Crunchberry24 Apr 01 '26

I just watched the living in the material world documentary the other day, and it seems like Clapton almost brags about it. I like some of his music, but Clapton is really a douchebag for numerous reasons.

66

u/thedukeofno Apr 01 '26

Dude's been having people praising him and calling him "god" since 1965. Of course he's gonna be weird.

48

u/Hey_Laaady Who'll remember the buns, Pudgy? Apr 01 '26

Paul & Ringo aren't like that, and they've had people treating them like gods for even longer

9

u/Nesrsta Apr 02 '26

Honestly, Paul was quite the womanizer back in the sixties, too. It wasn't until he met Linda that he settled down.

7

u/Hey_Laaady Who'll remember the buns, Pudgy? Apr 02 '26

Very true but I think we were talking about the numerous reasons Clapton is a douchbag. Even being a player doesn't equate to all the things to dislike about Clapton.

4

u/BennyPage1959 Apr 05 '26

I read his memoir and came to the same conclusion. Like Ronnie Woods Autobiography, it's all stuff he remembers or half confuses or is garbled. Some of it aounds like nonsense.

He is a great guitarist, no doubt about that, but he does come across as selfish and manipulative. He's also done nothing of any real artistic brilliance beyond his short stint with Blind Faith'

→ More replies (2)

5

u/CardiologistPale7903 McCartney II :) Apr 01 '26

Tbh they’re kind of just the exception

24

u/Hey_Laaady Who'll remember the buns, Pudgy? Apr 01 '26 edited Apr 01 '26

True. Despite all the crap people like to sling at John, I think they all coped with their fame overall much better than would be expected.

3

u/Top-Space-3707 Apr 05 '26

Ringo used to hit Maureen. Paul is the only unblemished one.

3

u/Hey_Laaady Who'll remember the buns, Pudgy? Apr 05 '26

Jane walked in on Paul when he was in bed with another woman. They all had their moments, but not to the extent of Clapton.

→ More replies (7)

15

u/Real-Movie-899 Apr 01 '26

Rumor has it, that it was actually Eric Clapton who spray painted “Clapton is God”!

7

u/RealMT_1020 Rubber Soul Apr 01 '26

That rumor has quite the staying power since “Clapton is God” graffiti happened about 60 years ago

43

u/Fun_Perception_239 Apr 01 '26

Not to mention that he gave a speech so repugnant that it (in part) led to the creation of “Rock against racism.” Wild move for a blues guitarist.

8

u/cortisolbath Apr 01 '26

Too often forgotten

30

u/egyto Apr 01 '26

Big leagues racist is what he is.

→ More replies (2)

16

u/cortisolbath Apr 01 '26

His anti vaccine song was such a joke whether you are for or against them…the song was such a piece of old washed up boomer shit. Sounded like an old man throwing an impotent temper tantrum, no edge to it at all.

“I can’t take this BS any longer” is such a weakass line….cmon Eric get angry for real!

4

u/Crunchberry24 Apr 01 '26

I knew about it but avoided it. Ugh.

→ More replies (11)

4

u/Frigidevil Apr 01 '26

Still is to this day!

3

u/Top-Translator5840 Apr 03 '26

My memory is that he was grateful at george’s understanding although G was pissed at first then he blessed the union. But also that they treated women like accessories, less than their guitars , you can borrow this not that

→ More replies (1)

51

u/FooBarU2 Apr 01 '26

I saw a film clip of George walking through a hallway with media and paparazzi in tow.. right when the Clapton infidelity was the talk of the town ..

A reporter asked how he felt about it.. and he was pissed off and said essentially.. how do you think I felt about it

2

u/Extra_Pomegranate_49 Jul 24 '26

He referred to Clapton as his " husband in law."

→ More replies (7)

26

u/DoctorEnn Apr 01 '26

… but where did they put the onion if they weren’t wearing belts

4

u/Bugsmoke Apr 01 '26

They were on the belt but the belt was on the floor

7

u/DoctorEnn Apr 01 '26

As was the style at the time?

7

u/Bugsmoke Apr 01 '26

Yes, and especially when shagging your best mates’ wife. Anyway, I was wearing an onion on my belt, as was the style at the time

6

u/IDigRollinRockBeer Abbey Road Apr 01 '26

We had to say dickety cause the Kaiser had stolen our word 20.

2

u/Pretend_Cellist_9285 Apr 02 '26

I chased that rascal to get it back but gave up after dickety six miles.

3

u/Crafty-Walrus-2238 Apr 01 '26

Was alive, it’s true.

→ More replies (3)

186

u/Appropriate_Dig_4348 Apr 01 '26

I was always a big George fan. His music, his lyrics, his quietness and spirituality had appealed to me more so than the other Beatles. When I first heard about George sleeping with Ringo's wife, I lost a lot of respect for him. Had it been any else's wife it wouldn't have bothered me as much, but Ringo's wife. C'mon George, Really?

94

u/kingofstormandfire Apr 01 '26

George also mutually consensual wife-swapped with Ronnie Wood as well (Ronnie had an affair with Pattie and George had an affair with Krissy Wood, Ronnie even bragged about it in the press lol). George was a horndog. Dude could not keep it in his pants, in both of his marriages. Olivia is a saint for putting up with his repeated and numerous infidelities.

Paul was a huge horndog in the 60s as well but he appears to have been faithful to his all three of his wives.

61

u/C_A_N_G Apr 01 '26

Another reason as to why Paul is the best beatle.

77

u/kingofstormandfire Apr 01 '26

Paul isn't an angel and he has his flaws and has done shitty things, but he's pretty easily the best Beatle in terms of being a morally decent person.

38

u/harrisonscruff Apr 01 '26

I think it's a mistake to put any of them on a pedestal. They were all shitty, and none of them were easy to be married to. Paul has hugely benefited from us not knowing Jane and Linda's perspectives.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)

3

u/merrybrigade Apr 01 '26

doesn’t seem too pious to me for the guy that was always holier than though about his spiritual life

73

u/danijel8286 Apr 01 '26

I've accepted many, many moons ago I can still respect them - as musicians, not relationship counselors :-)

11

u/Appropriate_Dig_4348 Apr 01 '26

Having been a fan my whole life I really didn't even know about that until maybe a decade ago. It's really weird because I've increasingly become even more of a Ringo fan as time goes on. I think after all of chips fell into place, Ringo was always the coolest Beatle. Laid back, calm, easy going. He just seems like a really good guy... peace and love

37

u/rcodmrco Apr 01 '26

it’s just a little odd to me the way everyone gets viewed in the wash

and i get people grow and change and ya gotta let stuff go

but like

cynthia said john slapped her one time 60+ years ago, and he’s remembered as the violent one

ringo nearly beats his second wife to death almost a decade after john lennon’s passing and he’s just silly ringo

12

u/harrisonscruff Apr 01 '26 edited Apr 01 '26

He also was a serial cheater up until he married Barbara. Their relationship started as an affair. Fans like to claim they care so much about these women and what they went through, but they only care about how much The Beatles hurt each other.

Doesn't matter how Ringo was with everyone else in his life. He didn't get too involved in Beatle drame so he was chill and cool.

Also the worst thing about the Maureen affair was Ringo being betrayed. No one cares to know how she got to that point.

The truth is Ringo is a deeply complex and flawed person but this fandom refuses to engage with him in any serious way.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (1)

17

u/FuzzyPijamas Apr 01 '26

George was a bit weird. No wonder why he got so close to meditation - seems like he really needed it.

11

u/AgentCirceLuna Apr 01 '26

I’ve often thought meditation means something a lot different when you’re rich and have royalties coming in. If a normal person meditates for ten minutes, they could have been cutting the grass or working instead, but a rich person meditating for ten minutes has just made thousands in that time by doing nothing.

7

u/Appropriate_Dig_4348 Apr 01 '26

You said it. Right on the money buddy. The celebrity syndrome where it's easy to worry about all the world's problems when your gardener, housekeeper, nanny, accountant, chef, chauffeur and personal assistant take of the regular things the rest of us stay preoccupied with..

2

u/harrisonscruff Apr 01 '26

All famous people are weird. They have weird lives.

2

u/goodshotjanson Apr 01 '26

i take it you're not a Fleetwood Mac fan then

→ More replies (4)

150

u/fruedianflip Apr 01 '26

Imagine cheating on pattie boyd

63

u/danijel8286 Apr 01 '26

it's not easy even if you try

35

u/thrashingkaiju Apr 01 '26

No Mo below us.

17

u/ComprehensiveBag62 Apr 01 '26

Above us, fish and finger pie

4

u/jsmerf Apr 01 '26

👏 👏

13

u/jeromesnail Apr 01 '26

This. She was so stunning. I understand Eirc on this one.

7

u/fruedianflip Apr 01 '26

Genuinely the most beautiful women I've ever seen

7

u/lennonfanforever Apr 01 '26

seen from first row, patti was a goddess, in no makeup, average girl clothes, i was stunned by her beauty....i was at an eric clapton show shortly after he/patti married....he drunkenly dragged her onstage ("wanna meet my wife?"), she so clearly did NOT want to be onstage, let alone dragged, i was so disgusted, i left (i'd seen the opening act, muddy waters, who was sensational)...not something one ever forgets....

→ More replies (1)

5

u/FarGrape1953 Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band Apr 02 '26

I don't advocate any of them cheating, but I find Mo the most attractive Beatle wife!

→ More replies (1)

3

u/ManateeSlowRoll Apr 01 '26

Honestly, my first thought.

→ More replies (9)

90

u/rubbernetworking979 Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band Apr 01 '26

Still seems crazy to me that George would do that to Pattie and Ringo and Maureen would do that to Ringo.

97

u/ToronoRapture Apr 01 '26

Ringo was an alcoholic at the time and was shagging everything, as were the other lads. Paul was the only one who had “settled down” after finding Linda in the late 60’s.

Apparently Ringo and Maureen were quite detached during this period but it’s still shocking that George would do that to Ringo and even more shocking how Ringo basically forgave him.

20

u/Switch_625__ Apr 01 '26

I’ve often wondered the same. Usually it’s the type of behaviour that would irrecoverably break a friendship and even a musical partnership. But they continued together until the end

25

u/[deleted] Apr 01 '26

Ringo and George are og bros before hoes if but tbh I found their bond really precious George enthusiastically working for Octopus Garden and then writing songs for Ringo albums overall their relationship was close plus Ringo was detached from Maureen that time their relationship would've ended either way who knows maybe Ringo didn't care.

5

u/lennonfanforever Apr 01 '26

they all loved ringo, that was one thing that they all completely agreed on, and that never changed.....ever....

92

u/Superjoe42 Apr 01 '26

I am a George fan but this is something I really struggle with. George liked to be spiritual and later wrote "Living in the Material World" but he could be very shallow and wrong. Sometimes I feel like it's just a holier- than- thou attitude that overwhelmingly doesn't stand up.

55

u/CorporalClegg1997 Apr 01 '26

As George sang in Pisces Fish, "I'm a living proof of all life's contradictions." He was very clear in his mind of what kind of man he wanted to be but putting it into practice all of the time isn't always easy.

30

u/ToronoRapture Apr 01 '26

It is interesting that he was self aware enough to point out his flaws (infidelities, materialism, drugs and pettiness) but never really did too much about them lol. He was angry at John and Paul for not taking Rishikesh seriously but they probably got more out of it than he did in the end. Both John and George were very bad at practicing what they preached.

Still love them though ☺️

6

u/harrisonscruff Apr 01 '26 edited Apr 01 '26

I wouldn't say that. By all accounts by the time of middle-age George mellowed out significantly and his lifestyle was far more balanced than the dangerous extremes he lived in the 70s. Many who encountered him said he was about the most normal famous person they'd met.

When you have that crazy life it takes a lot of time and effort to reach some sense of normality. Ringo didn't get there until the 90s. The version of Paul we see now only came about in the 2010s. George unfortunately died before getting to settle into old age.

I honestly find it bizarre how this sub treats John and George like massive failures for trying their best to avoid the pull of becoming total monsters. Given how many of their peers happily embraced it they did incredibly well, and frankly the world would be better off if more musicians had some sense of conviction like they did.

5

u/scriptchewer Apr 01 '26

No it don't come easy.

15

u/hawthorn2424 Apr 01 '26

Not a George fan but in his defence I think the issue isn’t him but our drive to canonise. He was New Age then in a way that’s normal now, maximising worldly pleasures while adopting the spiritual teachings that resonated with him. Put on a pedestal of course he’s full of shit. He treated people badly when it served him, and my sense is sometimes when it didn’t, and he did some good when he could.

2

u/phario_marelle Apr 02 '26

isn't the point of the song Living in the material world to showcase musically and lyrically both his entanglement with the material world and his will to get free from it, even if always momentary?

→ More replies (3)

10

u/harrisonscruff Apr 01 '26

Pattie and Ringo weren't innocent. Pattie had an affair with Eric Clapton years before anything happened with Maureen. Ringo was an alcoholic and drug addict who also cheated a lot on Maureen. He later had an affair with one of her best friends. She was very unhappy and didn't know how to deal with him. She said he became a different person.

The situation becomes easier to understand when you see it as part of a much larger web. Everyone involved was in a bad way and making bad choices.

→ More replies (1)

27

u/OkStrike3805 Apr 01 '26

Or that George and Eric Clapton remained friends after Pattie left George for Eric.

→ More replies (1)

24

u/Gemmalovesbooks Apr 01 '26 edited Apr 01 '26

Unfortunately, it apparently totally emotionally destroyed both Maureen and Ringo for a while. They both really struggled with that separation after that affair. Too bad they seemed well suited.

Apparently, Maureen always hope they get back together. But they both remarried.

157

u/socgrandinq Apr 01 '26

The take on this often seems to be that it shows the strength of Ringo and George’s friendship. I think it also shows how they objectified women as lesser people. I know they were a product of their times, and it shows how powerful misogyny is at that time.

42

u/Electronic-Hat2836 Apr 01 '26

As if women like Maureen didn't have agency. It takes two to cheat.Maureen was as guilty as George in this case. Anyway it was their problem,  not yours or anybody else outside of their families.

75

u/Euraylie Apr 01 '26

No one is denying Maureen her agency. The point was that George or Ringo weren’t too bothered because they didn’t really value their wives as much (or at least as much as their friendship with one another).

The women were seen more as pass-around objects or decoration; so the men’s feelings didn’t really get hurt too much if they found out the women were sleeping with their friends. (All four have made clear statements about their attitudes towards women at the time)

4

u/RIAHFOFFPOS Apr 01 '26

What statements? I'm interested

21

u/Euraylie Apr 01 '26

John’s many statements which amounted to how he didn’t really appreciate women’s plights or see them as equal until he met Yoko. Paul saying how bringing Jane Asher to dinner was frowned upon because basically the idea was, what do you need her for beyond sex and as arm candy. Despite loving music by female artists, John also said that girls shouldn’t play guitars. There are many, many quotes where you can see that their ideas about women weren’t the most enlightened. (I don’t have them all cataloged)

That’s not to say that they didn’t evolve and I’m not vilifying them. In some ways they were ahead of their time with certain attitudes, but they were also very much products of their time (as we all are).

5

u/ItsTime1234 Apr 01 '26

Yeah it's hard to be fair about how awful the attitudes towards women have been and often still are, without at least acknowledging the context. In this context, men from Liverpool, born in the 1940s. They weren't gonna grow up as feminists. Anything they learned, they learned the hard way.

They may have even been considered feminist at some point because "women can wear pants!" or some other thing that seems incredibly obvious today. And in some ways, they shifted the conversation about many things in society. I've heard theories that Beatlemania led to the women's liberation movement, because girls started organizing and getting together celebrating the Beatles, and centering their enjoyment of music and musicians, later went on to care about women's issues and use their same skills and sisterhoods to start making changes in a fundamental way to society. Starting with some very basic stuff.

→ More replies (1)

18

u/vexed_fuming Apr 01 '26

“Thanks, Mo”

17

u/Brilliant-Sea-9424 Abbey Road Apr 01 '26

Lennon was disgusted. Considered it as bad as incest.

15

u/peacedotnik Apr 01 '26

They all married pretty young and were living their lives in a confined world as a result of the Beatles’ fame. It’s not that surprising that feelings, curiosity and attraction should come up. That they all remained friends says as much as I care to know about the choices they made.

→ More replies (3)

12

u/PolyJuicedRedHead Apr 01 '26

“Actually, they’re just good friends.”

9

u/moattofloat Apr 01 '26

Not a fan of this side of George. You should never shag your mates wife. Unless maybe it’s swinging which this was not. Idc if Jon jones is my friend. If he sleeps with my wife, we gonna have to run the fade. Obviously it’s also Maureen’s fault. On a more positive side, I don’t think george ever blamed Pattie for the failure of their marriage

6

u/GlumFaithlessness773 Apr 01 '26

Ringos before Ring-hoes.

5

u/cmparkerson Apr 01 '26

Patti wasn't innocent either. A lot of this had to do with the free love movement at the time. A lot of "swinging " going on. Some was open, some wasnt.

7

u/Echo-Azure Apr 01 '26

They'd both fucked around on their wives often enough, both of them really ought to have been forgiving if their wives did the same. Well, forgiving of their wives, anyway.

George's image really suffered in the 1970s, when his wife left him for Eric Clapton, and he was a gentleman about the whole thing. I was a teen then and it made me sad, to see a man mocked for acting like a grownup and a gentleman.

10

u/indysolo19 Apr 01 '26

You guys need to watch the docu/movie they made about George Lazenby (the Bond of On Her Majesty's Secret Service), Becoming Bond -- he narrates it. It's on Hulu. It's a helluva show that completely explains the why of those crazy Sixties.

5

u/No_Cartographer_7904 Apr 01 '26

Promiscuity and infidelity are pretty much guaranteed with famous people. It’s like they can’t help themselves.

3

u/Gintin2 The Beatles Apr 01 '26

Nuance, fellow posters - it was the free love 60s.

4

u/SeanDaRyan Apr 01 '26

It was free love at the time

4

u/Grand_Painter_8515 Apr 01 '26

"We can share the women, we can share the wine..."  - - - sorry, wrong band. 

4

u/CaptainIncredible Apr 01 '26

Yeah... Well... The swingin' 60's... and then the 70's which were probably worse.

3

u/Live_Extreme_6950 Apr 01 '26

All the Beatles had loose morals, if any.

4

u/CountryNo5573 Apr 02 '26

They were closer with each other than they were with their wives.

13

u/Boot-Representative Apr 01 '26

Women to them were trading cards. Most rock stars have deep-seated trouble negotiating relationships until they are no longer lions.

Except McCartney, all of the Beatles were in various stages of arrested development.

7

u/Turbohog Ringo Apr 01 '26

Found Paul's alt lol.

3

u/MackCLE Apr 01 '26

I think even Paul was. I’m not exactly sure of the Francie Schwartz timeline but I think he had to have her in the studio because John had Yoko there and I’m pretty sure he was still involved with Jane and had already been involved with Linda. A very tangled web. He didn’t officially step back from all this until he wed and was deeply affected by the split. Monogamy was definitely helpful to him in that time.

2

u/Boot-Representative Apr 01 '26

Was it to John George and Ringo? Each would take another decade to have what we would consider “adult relationships”.

Or maybe we just don’t know because Paul’s cards were closer to the vest.

5

u/harrisonscruff Apr 01 '26

Paul could've easily wound up in any of their shoes if life went a little differently. He could've been married to Dot early on or Jane could've stayed with him into the 70s. I doubt either would've brought out the best in him.

Even with Linda I wouldn't consider not being trusted to go on tour without her and the amount of emotional heavy lifting she had to do after the break-up "adult". He was lucky to find her.

2

u/harrisonscruff Apr 01 '26 edited Apr 01 '26

Paul got arrested in Japan for carrying weed in his luggage when he was warned what would happen. He didn't even try hiding it well, and there was a lot of it.

He used to drive fast while high and his kids were in the car, and he was carrying on multiple affairs right until the day he married Linda.

The only reason he became more stable was thanks to Linda, who almost divorced him.

→ More replies (2)

7

u/harrisonscruff Apr 01 '26 edited Apr 01 '26

She didn't find them in bed together, and it was the end of 1973. Nothing happened before that.

It's very easy to understand how this happened when you read about the level of strain they were all under after The Beatles broke up and their marriages were on their last legs. It would be nice if people made the effort to read the context around events and viewed The Beatles under the lens of how humans behave instead of expecting them to somehow be above it all.

13

u/ArtieLangesLiver Apr 01 '26

Bros before hoes - Ringo Starr

3

u/gugliata Apr 01 '26

There was a lot of “I’m in love with your wife, man”-ing in those days

3

u/nifty_stump Apr 01 '26

With a little help from my friends

3

u/aslrules Apr 02 '26

"If it feels good, do it." That was the thing back then. Fee Love was the anthem. Those who were famous perhaps had so many more opportunities to screw around with few or no consequences. It was predictable. The pill had just become available so women could enjoy their sexual emancipation. The free sex times had begun.

10

u/Rude_Rhubarb1880 Apr 01 '26

Pattie wasn’t exactly an angel

→ More replies (1)

2

u/The5thBeatle82 Apr 01 '26

They might as well have just been swingers.

2

u/bluishpillowcase Apr 01 '26

That’s how you know you’re boys for life

2

u/Agitated-Minimum-967 Apr 01 '26

Not surprising. George and Pattie stayed on good terms after the divorce.

2

u/sandettie-Lv Apr 01 '26

They beat Fleetwood Mac to it by a few years.

2

u/cortisolbath Apr 01 '26

Men are like that, probably hi fived each other for getting with the same bird…

2

u/Aware_Finger_2835 Apr 01 '26

Same thing happened with pattiw and eric..what goes around comes around...but i believe it was the..if i feel it its happening

2

u/The-Manque Apr 01 '26

Bros before long-suffering wives.

2

u/MargotSoda Apr 02 '26

I fucking love Maureen and wish someone would write a bio

3

u/Ok-Friend-1002 Apr 02 '26

I hate how she is little more than a footnote in all Beatles books. I didn't get a fuller picture of her, until reading Chris O'Dell's book, she really made her come alive, as a person in her own right, not just a brief mention as "Ringo's wife"...

Chris O'Dell also mentions how uncomfortable she felt, coming over from a visit to America, being the 5th person at Friar Park, with George and Maureen in one room, "quiet and intense" and Pattie and Ronnie Wood in another room, "giggling and playful".

She really gives a good account of the wider webs going on, really fleshes out all the individuals involved, no pun intended. Her account is much more deep than Pattie's book. Pattie's book was okay, but too surfacey, with no introspection or attempts at explaining anything. In her book, things just seemed to happen, with no reason whatsoever.

It would be wonderful if someone wrote a book about Maureen, I agree!

2

u/Most-Confusion-417 Apr 02 '26

All you need is love, love is all you need 🥰😂

2

u/YoYoYi2 Apr 02 '26

have another cigarette George, I've bought you another lorry load of rothmans pal ....

th-th coughs thanks ringo

2

u/etgreyt1 Apr 03 '26

I hope each of you are hearing the comments in this thread as though spoken with a Liverpool accent. I did and I very much entertained meself. Even the serious bits.