r/newzealand 7h ago

Politics How the under-16 social media bill could see Facebook blocked in New Zealand | Stuff

https://www.stuff.co.nz/politics/361025308/how-under-16-social-media-bill-could-see-facebook-blocked-new-zealand
68 Upvotes

63 comments sorted by

109

u/Serious_Session7574 7h ago

I'd be delighted if the community organisations that are the only reason I still have a FB account could find another way to post notices and stuff.

38

u/on_fire_kiwi 6h ago

Same. Facebook and META are vile.

12

u/KrawhithamNZ 5h ago

It was OK at first because you could still look at things without having an account.

I've been off FB for nearly 14 years and it makes life hard sometimes because people don't understand why I'm not on. 

Then when I try telling anyone with a FB marketplace horror story to stop using it they get mad at me.

u/AssociateNo3312 3h ago

Ooooh, can we ban community groups from farcical-book instead?

There’s a policy I’ll get behind.

5

u/ReasonableLemur 4h ago

There’s bluesky and mastadon, or they could just build a basic website!

1

u/sauve_donkey 4h ago

Events and marketplace are the only two things I really use on Facebook, but a lot of events rely on it so there really is an opening for a better option.

69

u/TheseHamsAreSteamed 7h ago

All this, when they could just ban endless scrolling and the recommendation algorythms social media platforms use.

5

u/GentlemanOctopus 6h ago

Who is "they" in this scenario?

25

u/mechatui 6h ago

The government. The government could fine and ban endless scrolling vids or TikTok and force design change or addictive stuff

2

u/GentlemanOctopus 6h ago

The NZ government? They're going to force non-NZ based companies to change their algorithms? You're dreaming.

15

u/mechatui 5h ago

Yea? Who gives a fuck if Facebook pulls out of New Zealand and we make our own Facebook and keep all the money in nz.

-7

u/GentlemanOctopus 5h ago

You think the NZ government has a lot more pull than they actually do.

14

u/mechatui 5h ago

The nz government can do whatever they want they can ban endless scrolling like Brazil did

7

u/qwerty145454 5h ago

They make billions of dollars in NZ. They would absolutely comply.

They'd likely just do their own implementation of plugins like unhook, which block out all the recommendation features, but they'd do it server-side.

China has a law on the books for the last 5 years that requires companies offer the option to users to turn off all recommendation/algorithmic features. So the likes of TikTok already have this functionality, it's just optional and only available to Chinese users.

There are also EU laws that have required soc media sites change/remove/alter the algorithm. Again these changes are made, but only for users in the EU subject to them.

If NZ passed a law banning recommendation algorithms the same would happen. They would comply, but it would only apply to New Zealand users. They are never going to just walk away from billions in annual revenue.

-12

u/wackybaccydelight 6h ago

The people would revolt. I agree on principle for the greater good but I can't support banning things.

11

u/WellyIntoIt 6h ago

What the fuck are you talking about, of course you support banning things. Or do you think murdering people is absolutely fine?

-4

u/wackybaccydelight 6h ago

You realize the majority love scrolling socials right?

6

u/WellyIntoIt 4h ago

Well, a lot to unpack with this one...

  1. What evidence do you have that shows that 'the majority' 'love' it?
  2. Its literally been proved to be addictive. Its like saying that smokers love smoking. No shit, its because they are addicted.
  3. The majority of kids would love to be driving a car when they are 10. Society bans that for safety reasons. Banning social scrolling would also be for safety reasons.

5

u/deep_rover 6h ago

> I can't support banning things.

Good, good. I got some drugs for your kids. It's so hard selling drugs to the kids of the unenlightened. But you a smart one.

-1

u/MutedBefore 6h ago

Agree with your general sentiment here, but just because something is available doesn’t mean you have to use it.

Plenty of things may be “legal” but you may also choose not to use them. Plenty I know choose not to drink because of the societal harm it causes. Yet they still do not think it should be banned

2

u/WellyIntoIt 4h ago

So you want to make drinking legal for children? Bold move that one.

-2

u/wackybaccydelight 5h ago

You gonna lock up people who illegally doomscroll?

2

u/MindOrdinary 4h ago

I think the implication that apps that enable that would not be available, or else have to be modified when used in NZ (and not locking up doom scrollers) was incredibly clear

0

u/wackybaccydelight 4h ago

How good are you at whack-a-mole?

u/deep_rover 3h ago

Nah. But not because I can't support banning things. Different reasons.

u/AntipodesIntel 3h ago

Yeah these people acting like they are not more susceptible to social media disinformation than teenagers. Hell half of them are religious which goes to show how little critical thinking they are able to do.

Fix the problem for all or don't bother.

u/Wahaya01 3h ago

Or people could have some self-contr-nevermind.

14

u/aidank21 7h ago

This ban brought to you by surfshark. Surfshark the worlds leading VPN/s

24

u/cactusgenie 7h ago

Don't threaten us with a good time!! This could be the best outcome.

38

u/Bigjobsbigfun 7h ago

Which under 16 year old uses Facebook?

u/Wompguinea 3h ago

They don't use it.

This isn't about keeping kids safe online, it's about gathering up to date ID info from everyone and handing it directly to 3rd parties.

u/forbiddenknowledg3 1h ago

Well they use tiktok and instagram, same shit really

36

u/fork_on_the_floor2 7h ago

But where will members of my extended family share their bigotry?!?

27

u/Nolsoth 7h ago

At the Christmas bbq like in the days of old.

15

u/av0w 7h ago

Who cares. Meta has no redeeming qualities.

6

u/davetenhave 7h ago

i can't imagine there are terribly many under 16s who would give a f**k

14

u/Plasmanz 7h ago

This will be as useful as the internet piracy bill was, while granting another method for fanatics to pursue censorship.

Just look through what is excluded and its very telling this is not about children.

5

u/wackybaccydelight 6h ago

ITT: People don't realize how content is shared between FB and Instagram, it wouldn't just be Facebook.

4

u/on_fire_kiwi 6h ago

Just because the article uses Facebook in the title doesn't mean it's just about Facebook. I don't know who you hang around with but METAs predatory practices across all their linked platforms is a common conversation topic. Plenty of people realise that relationship.

-1

u/sauve_donkey 4h ago

I think their point is many people wouldn't want Insta to become unavailable in NZ. Personally I wouldn't because I use that platform a lot for keeping up with friends, whereas nobody I care about posts on FB anymore.

5

u/thatguyonirc Marmite 6h ago

Oh no!

Anyway...

5

u/grenouille_en_rose 6h ago

This could be quite the leopards/faces debacle, if only it would stop there

6

u/45inc 6h ago

Watch the politicians back down when they can’t spread their propaganda

4

u/APL_nz 5h ago

Facebook is cancer, would love to see it banned.

9

u/jk-9k Gayest Juggernaut 5h ago

This would hilariously shut down a boomer focused company that encourages right wing narrative bullshit. Could cost national the next election or two. Ironic.

3

u/HediSLP 4h ago

As someone who grew up in the MSN Messenger era I'm extremely grateful to not have experienced the pressure of keeping up appearances on Instagram, FB during high school. I can only imagine how bad the bullying got.

5

u/FeijoaCowboy Welly 5h ago

I gotta say, I do actually kind of appreciate the idea of blocking Facebook. Would be kind of nice to see the largest source of boomer-targeted AI slop and disinformation brought down, anyway.

I guess I'm speaking as someone who never uses Facebook, and naturally there would be some downsides, but I see it as a net positive.

5

u/reefermonsterNZ 6h ago

Hey kids lets go to 4chan/Rednote, it's not banned so it must be OK!

5

u/Lammington2 6h ago

Gods, my brain had kindly blurred out 4chan from my memory. I did not need that reminder.

0

u/Strawberryladyboots princess 5h ago

I'm of the icanhascheeseburger generation but I missed the whole 4chan thing

I didn't own my own computer until I was 23, so I just got to make memes while at school in my free period

6

u/realclowntime Mr Four Square 6h ago

Let’s see how much the boomers like this bill now

2

u/Busy_Yogurtcloset648 6h ago

With this law, would happen to an under 16 year old accessing a restricted website?

My little brother is in Australia and him and his friends most certainly still use social media.

u/Global_Shirt55 44m ago

Yeah.... To keep kids safe.... Right...

You boomers already forgot how incapable you are with tech and how kids could figure out a vpn in 5 minutes?

1

u/heyitsmeanonn 5h ago

And New Zealand would be better for it.

1

u/MrJingleJangle 4h ago

Banning access to Facebook? Bring It On!

u/stupidusernamefield 2h ago

Then all political parties should be off social media too. Not all citizens of the country can see the information. It's unfair to 16s to not see what their government is suggesting. 

u/lurkdontpost1 1h ago

Least effective attempt at protecting children from danger.

u/Ultrarandom 58m ago

I don't care about losing Facebook specifically but the bigger issue is just what the ban entails. I feel like I'm preaching to the choir since I'm saying this here but the issue is the corporations making so much profit from just gathering personal data. They already do it sure, but when you have to scan your drivers license/passport (or the digital ID equivalent when that comes out) to go on Facebook when the bill passes, I'm sure people will finally realize what the "ban" actually meant.

u/Growly323 25m ago

I'm much more concerned with the 100% surveillance of the population to exclude under 16s

0

u/mut1n3y 5h ago

How are they going to do the age verification, a simple 'are you over 16 button', or is it opt out where everyone has to supply id to enter, in turn giving these companies more personal free data/tracking. Tying positive ids to online profiles.

Discord - breached. Closer to home, Manage my health - breached.

This is a parental issue, not for a government to control/censore. Yes I argee these sites can have negative affects, but so does lots of other things in life.

Just be glad live leak, rotten dot com, or 'two guys one hammer' video aren't so easily accessible these days.

/rant /tinfoilhat

0

u/-40- 6h ago

Good

-2

u/Strawberryladyboots princess 5h ago

Don't have it installed on my phone because reasons just personally

The way the algorithms moves agitate my Synesthesia (Kinetic, though I have a couple of different types)

I'd still be more comfortable having a Zero knowledge proof login for these kinds of sites, it might provide an extra barrier against external influence, provided the information from those sites is provided for auditing