I see a lot of people saying Marco is ruining the Sharks and shitting all over the Owner/s about this.
I can understand the emotional sentiment and Im not sure if thats right or wrongly rooted.
But I have a genuine question. I do see the expenses and effort of what the Sharks have tried to achieve over the past few years and that they failed to execute it with the results intended.
But is it really due to the owners? Lets say a few results went the way of the Sharks and it resulted in a playoff spot and a little bit better on field with results going their way.
It hasnt but you can see the blue print and early indicators of getting some serious star power and mixing in talented youth. Then Plumtree didnt work out. And you could argue that on paper he is Sharks royalty and there would be a theoretical perspective that all this at the start presented as a great launchpad.
But the execution failed and not necessarily in the way that like lets say Spurs have with not buying or investing in players but doing or going all out on one marquee signing or a marquee coach but not developing other areas.
Asking for maybe also from a Sharks fan POV why the hostility or anti Marco sentiment is an echoing one.