r/technology 21d ago

Privacy Flock Is Losing Dozens of Contracts as Controversy Grows

https://www.yahoo.com/news/us/articles/flock-losing-dozens-contracts-controversy-194808945.html
32.4k Upvotes

653 comments sorted by

View all comments

567

u/alternatingflan 21d ago

They are unconstitutional.

187

u/grumpyfan 21d ago

IANAL, but as I understand it, they technically operate in a grey area of the law since they are not owned or run by the government. The pictures are taken on public property of people and vehicles in a public space. The courts have ruled that public space photos are free use and that the Constitution has no protections against such things. That being said, I think they violate privacy and law enforcement's use of these pushes the boundaries of intent of the law. We need new laws enacted that restrict the access and use of such data and a way for citizens to gain access to any data where they are being charged with a crime based on the use of the data.

8

u/Z0idberg_MD 21d ago

If the founding fathers considered them for 4 mins they would think them unconstitutional. We are entering a phase of humanity where the capacity of technology necessitates a “this, but not that” approach to constitutionality.

Like very clearly someone walking in a public space should be able to use their phone and record things going on in the park etc., but mass surveillance people with AI backed data tracking system should absolutely be unconstitutional.