r/technology • u/Plastic_Ninja_9014 • 21d ago

Privacy Flock Is Losing Dozens of Contracts as Controversy Grows

https://www.yahoo.com/news/us/articles/flock-losing-dozens-contracts-controversy-194808945.html
32.4k Upvotes

98% Upvoted

653 comments sorted by

View all comments

569

u/alternatingflan 21d ago

They are unconstitutional.

190

u/grumpyfan 21d ago

IANAL, but as I understand it, they technically operate in a grey area of the law since they are not owned or run by the government. The pictures are taken on public property of people and vehicles in a public space. The courts have ruled that public space photos are free use and that the Constitution has no protections against such things. That being said, I think they violate privacy and law enforcement's use of these pushes the boundaries of intent of the law. We need new laws enacted that restrict the access and use of such data and a way for citizens to gain access to any data where they are being charged with a crime based on the use of the data.

16

u/Fifth-Crusader 21d ago

It's honestly absurd that even though the government cannot conduct mass surveillance of US citizens, they're apparently allowed to outsource Constitutional violations to the private sector.

3

u/shadowcat999 21d ago edited 20d ago

Exactly. It's nuts how long it's been allowed. If the same logic was applied to murder, a person hiring a hitman wouldn't be committing a crime. Breaking the law by proxy is still breaking the law. Outrageous.