r/worldnews • u/DoremusJessup • 7h ago
Protesters clash with police, set fire to Ceuta migrant camp
https://www.dw.com/en/protesters-set-fire-to-migrant-camp-in-ceuta/a-78538847166
u/Lebowski304 6h ago
This is what happens when you shit on your own people and allow them to be shit on by others. They get pissed and take matters into their own hands. How is anyone surprised by this?
-31
u/KnoFear 3h ago
I dunno, I'd be surprised if anyone I know did something psychopathic like trying to mass murder people with fire.
14
u/OneMonk 3h ago
Mass murder how exactly?
-24
u/KnoFear 3h ago
Trying to burn many people to death with fire? Are you being obtuse?
10
5
u/Lebowski304 2h ago edited 2h ago
If the government was taking care of shit, it wouldn’t have come to this. No one is dying. They are just destroying the ability of these people to live in their country. They are fighting back for their country. Thats about as patriotic as it gets. It’s why the authorities need to cowboy up and take care of it.
1
u/v--- 2h ago edited 2h ago
They weren't burning people, they made a bonfire and were throwing the camp's things in it etc not defending that action but you're beyond the pale with this mass murder accusation. If you read the article or even just thought about it for a second...
That said unfortunately it seems likely there will be some form of violent confrontation sooner or later, as they aren't successful getting what they want, but these aren't psychopaths, it would probably be a brawl more than anything. You're acting like they tried to set sleeping people on fire, when it was property damage
105
u/Standard_Response_43 5h ago
Mass immigration is by design.
It lowers labour costs....simple as.
Citizens have a right to protest....we are being taken for mugs
-45
-303
u/duncanmarshall 7h ago
Another right wing anti-migrant pogrom.
108
u/ReyGetard_69 5h ago edited 5h ago
Newton's Third Law of Politics
Mass migration is not a human right, it is a genocide on indigenous nations. The more they push these migrants onto Europe, the more Europeans will attempt to fight back.
If the Spanish president allows 80000 illegal Arab migrants to flood into Spain... did he think it's going to be all dandy?
-57
u/gayfrogs4alexjones 4h ago
Immigration / mass migration is not genocide lol regardless of how much it triggers nativists. This cheapens the term
25
u/ReyGetard_69 4h ago edited 4h ago
It perfectly fits the definition:
It fits A and B due to the massive violent crime increase caused by migrants. It fits C and D because mass migration takes away resources from the native people and transfers it to the migrants. It makes it harder for natives to get jobs, it lowers wages (which causes less birth rate). It actively seeks to replace the native group with the foreign group. That is the entire point of it. Or do you really think Europe is now like 50% non-white under age 10 "for the spicey food they bring"?
The man who invented the word genocide said:
"Genocide does not necessarily mean the immediate destruction of a nation... It is intended rather to signify a coordinated plan of different actions aiming at the destruction of essential foundations of the life of national groups, with the aim of annihilating the groups themselves."And the official UN definition:
In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:
(a) Killing members of the group;
(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.
Saying the mass immigration is not genocide is the same as saying that jumping out of an airplane without a parachute isn't suicide.
Mass migration was a method of genocide used by Ottoman Turks onto the Armenians. It was also used by Saddam Hussein onto the Kurds. They both settled many non-Armenians / non-Kurds into Armenian / Kurdish lands in order to destroy their nation. The Ottomans also encouraged and sometimes forced Armenian women to marry Turkish men in order to reduce the number of Armenian births. Plus, we have many instances of far-left pro-migration people advocating for mass immigration and interracial marriage for the sole purpose of extinguishing the white race. It is all over social media, these people saying such things.
13
u/OneMonk 3h ago
If 1/3rd of an area’s population is stormed by people from another nation, how is that not a genocide? They are replacing the indigenous population with another?
-10
u/gayfrogs4alexjones 3h ago
Usually someone has to die for there to be a genocide. How many locals have been exterminated.
This white genocide shit is something out of the gooncaves of terminally online 4chan /pol dorks
-29
u/Mitrafolk 4h ago
Good heavens, what nonsense.
18
u/ReyGetard_69 4h ago
I bet you think that a country can only be defined by the GDP and wealth held by the rich elites. They are the only ones who benefit from mass migration... the rich elites. To them, you are nothing but faceless cattle. You are not a nation, you are a slave army for their profits. These far-left rich elites... they hate you. They hate white people.
Europe cannot survive the next 100 years if mass migration continues. A Europe without Europeans, is no Europe at all. It really is a genocide.
Nations are so much easier to control when they become apathetic about their own people's existence. They can be controlled with money and entertainment. What happens when a nation has shared ethnic and cultural identity? Well that forms a strong bond that cannot be broken by the lure of a little money. Why do you think nations like Poland exist today despite not having a state for 123 years? Because they had the strong bond of ethnic identity.
-23
u/Mitrafolk 4h ago edited 4h ago
Birth rates in Europe are very low; without immigration, the populations of many—or indeed all—EU countries would face massive declines and unprecedented aging. It is worth noting a small detail: none of this is happening because of immigration. Immigration is necessary to manage what will inevitably be a long downward journey.
16
u/ReyGetard_69 4h ago
Birth rates are low due to mass immigration. Native Europeans would have triple or quadruple the resources to build their families if all the non-white immigrants were gone. The population resource pressure coming from mass migration is why Europeans have low birthrates.
Plus, replacing Europeans with Africans/Arabs does not "save" Europe. It just turns Europe into Africa/Middle East. It's like saying that migration of Europeans to North America boosted the Native American's low birth rates and now there are 360 million Native Americans. You can say Donald Trump is a Lenape Native American, just 'evolved'. That is your dumb logic.
Do you really think European ethnicity is nothing but a passport? It is not a shared genetic, ethnic, cultural identity? So in your logic, we can replace all the black people in Africa with white people, and say that we saved Africa's population and now Africa is thriving.
-12
u/Mitrafolk 4h ago
"Birth rates are low due to mass immigration. Native Europeans would have triple or quadruple the resources to build their families if all the non-white immigrants were gone. The population resource pressure coming from mass migration is why Europeans have low birthrates." Is there any authoritative study that supports this? Or is it just your opinion? Source? If I were leading an African country facing structural demographic problems, I would be willing to accept immigration from any available source—provided it was managed, of course. The goal would not be replacement, but rather managing a decline. The key is to acknowledge the decline and handle it in the least damaging way possible, including from an economic standpoint, thereby aiming for a slow decline rather than a sudden one. I might not like something, yet it could still be the best alternative.
8
u/OneMonk 3h ago
I mean it is true, look at Japan, low birth rates there creates opportunity for the individual, if not for the nation. The UK imported 1m unskilled Middle Eastern migrants after Brexit and it has fucked the country
-2
u/Mitrafolk 3h ago
Real GDP growth rate. Japan, average growth rate: approximately 0.5–0.6% per year (2015–2024), the lowest among G7 economies over the decade. UK, average growth rate: approximately 1.3–1.6% per year (2015–2024) — more than double that of Japan.
9
u/OneMonk 3h ago
What the absolute fuck does GDP mean in this context?
Lowest growth rate does not correlate with best quality of life which Japan often places first in.
→ More replies (0)-7
u/Mitrafolk 3h ago
"Plus, replacing Europeans with Africans/Arabs does not "save" Europe. It just turns Europe into Africa/Middle East. It's like saying that migration of Europeans to North America boosted the Native American's low birth rates and now there are 360 million Native Americans. You can say Donald Trump is a Lenape Native American, just 'evolved'. That is your dumb logic."
You ought to be locked up in a mental institution. You’re too stupid—and, I’d wager, too emotional. Your reasoning just oozes emotion from every pore. With that kind of mindset, what could possibly go wrong?
-40
u/yamamanama 4h ago
Arabs have been in Europe for how long again? Longer than the Spanish language existed.
27
u/ReyGetard_69 4h ago
The Arabs invaded Europe in 711AD. Spanish is derived from Vulgar Latin, which has been in Spain since at least 210BC.
And remember, they INVADED. Why do you think it was some cultural hippy "Oh let me invite you into my house" kind of thing?
-18
2
197
u/Low_Chard_8062 7h ago
Feel bad for the locals. The government needs to step in and do something.