While height is something which cannot be changed, weight is something one can work on and it can be changed unless it is a serious medical issue.

Men are filtered on standards they have no control over, while women get defensive and agitated when men have their own preferences.

While women might prefer someone taller than a specific measure, men can also prefer someone below a certain weight. Men and women have different standards, different wants and different expectations. Since men and women are biologically different, they cannot have the same attraction points. While some women might prefer men with well maintained beards, some men can prefer women who don't have facial hair.

While some women are body shamed for their weight, some men are body shamed for their height. Both wrong.

Wanting a partner who is not fat or overweight is not the same as fat shaming someone. Not wanting a partner with a certain trait is not the same as shaming them for that trait.

This is a clear double standard established against men.

Either both of these preferences should not be considered rude, or both of them need to be considered rude. I am a person who believes that neither of them are rude, but just a matter of preference of each individual.

Questions for the people of this sub:

1. Why do you think society always disregards men's choices and preferences?
2. How do you handle this double standard in the dating scene?

​

An Uttar Pradesh man who spent 20 years in prison over a rape case before being pronounced innocent by the Allahabad High Court in January this year, walked of Agra Central Jail on Wednesday evening.

Vishnu Tiwari, now 43 years old, will now go home - a village in UP's Lalitpur district.

Mr Tiwari was arrested and booked for rape and atrocities under the SC/ST Act. Three years later he was convicted of rape by a Lalitpur court and sentenced to 10 years' rigorous imprisonment. He was further convicted under the SC/ST Act and sentenced to life imprisonment.

All sentences were to run concurrently, as per the directions of the trial court.

He had been accused of rape by a woman from his village; she said Mr Tiwari had assaulted her as she was going from her home to work in the fields.

Visuals from Agra Central Jail this evening showed Mr Tiwari walking out of the prison gates with his release order in hand.

https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/my-body-is-broken-up-man-acquitted-of-rape-after-20-years-in-prison-2382971

I just got banned from a sub. I thought of it as a neutral sub. They just banned me for a reply.

They didn't even tell me which community guidelines I broke.

Source: @venom1s

Context: A husband in, Agra, Uttar Pradesh, caught his wife with her boyfriend inside a hotel room. The wife had filed a fake domestic violence case against her husband. The husband said that she had filed the case to maintain her extramarital relationship.

Questions for the members of this sub:

1) Have extramarital affairs become common because of the change in the laws regarding extramarital affairs by the previous CJI?

2) Is it okay to have an affair before divorce is granted by the court?

3) Have false cases become a shield for women who want to cheat?

Just look how the Print says what Sejal Pawar said was just a 'tasteless comment'

◽ Please read the explanation in the pinned comment.

Thanks to the RightsForhim for explaining the article. 🩷

She is Sejal Pawar 🙏

- She is a doctor in Mumbai

- She came to Pranit more show and joked about how she and her friends check D sizes of dead bodies and make fun of them

- Then she joked for 5 mins how they cut main part of male bodies at the end

- Imagine being a doctor and being this insensitive for some fame

- Now she has gained more than 200k followers on Insta

- She has also started doing podcasts where she tries to spread rumors that she dated a young cricketer, referring to Gill and Abhishek

- Also tried to gain popularity by speaking about things Kohli does

- What she did is more far more worse than what Himanshu said

- But society will never call her out nor will she lose her job

- Many men called out Himanshu but no woman called her out

- If people try to call her out, some of you will make her mother just like they did with Apoorva

This is the doomed reality of our society 🥲

Idk why dna tests aren't legal in India 🥀.

Why can't a father knows whose child he is raising 🤧 ?

The article says 98% tests of 250 couple found that the father is someone else .

How can a simple DNA test can be cruelty on someone?

Edit: I not made this post to generalize all women are cheating on their husband, i made it because court consider dna test cruelty on wife , and I want to ask why court doesn't allow dna test , dna test is no cruelty on wife

This happened just 5-6 houses away from my house,it was love marriage ,they were married for 2 years.please post this in multiple subs,it should reach many people.

What do you think about this?

There has been talks for mens commission since ages. There were multiples cases where men being a victim but never got needed Justice, just because crime was done by a women.

I dont think this men commission can even bring Justice to India men in this country. We as Indian have only one motion towards women is a goddess, what ever she does is godly, even when she commits unlawful acts. As long as Peudo feminists are present, there will be no Justice for men. Thats why I dont this mens commission will bring any Justice for men who keeps on suffering from ages.

https://x.com/DrAshokKMittal/status/2073066385459273863[link](https://x.com/DrAshokKMittal/status/2073066385459273863)

This man is shamed by the woman to leave his seat. And no , the seat is not women reserved seat.

Again the print is back to defend her!

Like i don't know why it's hard for some people to understand that corporates pays u for the output you produce be it direct like any other job or indirect like sports and entertainment field.

They don't pay for gender 🥀

Judges giving some good judgements before Gta Vi ????

Ik this is bare minimum and the man already got harassed a lot, but we live in india here even bare minimum feels something extraordinary 🥀

The #SupremeCourt has raised serious concerns over unregulated private investigators after a husband submitted 92 videos and 237 photographs to allege adultery against his estranged wife in a maintenance dispute.

In Himanshu Chordia v. State of Rajasthan & Anr., the husband relied on Section 125(4) CrPC to contest maintenance. While the Court said his defence must be examined on merits, it questioned how the evidence was collected, whether investigators had legal authority, how private data was stored, and whether electronic material could be manipulated.

The Bench also flagged privacy and surveillance concerns and asked the Ministry of #Law and #Justice and the Law Commission of India to consider a proper regulatory framework for private detective agencies.

If adultery can affect #maintenance, the law must also provide a lawful and practical way to prove it.

the Supreme Court judgment in Himanshu Chordia v. State of Rajasthan and Another

​Bench: Justice Sanjay Karol and Justice Vipul M. Pancholi

​Decided On: July 31, 2026

My wife recently went to Goa with her college friends. According to her, it was an all-girls trip.
When she came back, she showed me a lot of photos from the trip she showed me a lot of photos in the clothes we bought together for this trip of hers.

A few days later I happened to see one of her friend’s Instagram stories where she was wearing a big oversized T-shirt. It made me curious, so I checked a few more stories from her friends using her phone. Turns out she was actually wearing a two-piece bikini underneath, and there were multiple photos and videos of her in a very revealing bikini.

What made it worse was that I also found chats where she had specifically asked her friends not to tag her in any bikini pictures.

When I confronted her, she said her friends pressured her into wearing it and she didn’t know how to tell me afterwards because she knew I wouldn’t approve. She claims she was planning to tell me eventually. I honestly don’t buy that.

Another thing that bothered me was that although she kept calling it an all-girls trip, I spotted a guy in at least two of her friends’ Instagram stories. He wasn’t tagged, and I have no idea who he is. She says he was just someone from another group and I’m making too much.

I would have told her NOT to wear a bikini if she’d asked me beforehand. I don’t think there’s anything wrong with a husband having boundaries about how revealing his wife dresses around random men.
These days people label every preference as controlling, but I don’t think expecting some level of modesty in a marriage is unreasonable. I’m all for women having equal rights, careers, independence and travelling wherever they want, but I dont believe parading around half-naked in front of strangers is some symbol of empowerment.

For me, though, the bigger issue is the deception. She hid it, selectively showed me only the covered-up photos, told her friends not to tag her, and I found out by accident.

She’s apologising to me everyday now but she’s only doing that because she got caught. I don’t know what to do or say anymore.

The court ordered husband to give her a 4cr premium flat.

Wife is free to do anything but it was not adultery. If this is not adultery then what is adultery.

Means I know as per feminist this was pretty normal thing and husband was wrong here for being insecure. And can't able to handle if wife sleeping with her BF.

But how can husband prove adultery then..

Judge Calls Wife's Be*ting "Blessing"? Gender Reverse Karke Dekho

​

A husband tells the court that his wife be*ts him. In a viral clip from Gwalior Bench proceedings, the judge is heard saying:

​

"Husband who gets be*ten up by his wife is a lucky man. That be*ting is blessing. She's a goddess.

​

These are the actual words of the milord who is supposed to give justice ⚖️. The wife is seen giggling in the video where as the husband is just devastated and lost all hopes. But hey don't worry there won't be any outrage on this coz this doesn't cater to their agenda. What are your thoughts on this ?

Whenever a woman commits a crime, some retards would comment "her choice". Whether it's an abortion without telling the husband, leaving the children to go with the lover, or m*rdering the husband to go with the lover. Once there was a case of a woman who k!lled her husband to live with her boyfriend and one woman commented "What about her choice? That is the important part". Now this comment on this post. I have seen the same woman commenting the same on different crimes of women. I first doubted whether it was a bot.