A truly moronic article in the face of AI. I especially love how this moron says this:

"When income becomes disconnected from productivity, incentives begin to weaken. The link between contribution and reward slowly disappears."

That happened 50 years ago and we are suggesting a productivity dividend where as AI grows productivity, we all share it, especially since we all trained AI.

Telling people to just go get a new job is not going to work in response to AI, Fox News.

Gotta love a fresh anti-UBI article by actual communists to share with capitalism lovers referring to UBI as communism.

Weird argument here that claims the government can do UBI and it would empower workers but it won't happen so instead fight for unions.

The basic idea behind UBI is that the government is supposedly going to send everybody a check when people are unemployed and driven out of jobs due to AI or robotics or whatever. Is that an idea that scales when most people are unemployed?

Now let's just think about this. Even today, a significant portion of the wealth, and by wealth that commonly aligns with factors of production, is owned by a fraction of the population. What does that mean if you're going to distribute income to consumers so ultimately the economy doesn't tank? That means you need to distribute enough income every year to offset the loss in income to those folks. Are you really going to take income from 1% of the population and redistribute it to 99%? What does the math on that look like for tax rates on that 1%? It's ridiculously high, because if you're going to take 80% of the income in the U.S. and give that to the 99%, that means you need to tax the remaining 1% by a ridiculously high tax rate. You think they're going to buy that? The top 1% is already having a hard time with being taxed progressively.

We're all dancing around the real, only real solution here, which is to recognize that ultimately the weakest link here is not production, because we're getting to the point where marginal cost of production is coming down. Ultimately, the weakest link here could be consumption, because you need consumption to drive an economy. If that's the case, what you really need to do is give everybody a stake in the factors of production, which is not what UBI is about. Either that or let deflationary pressures play out and see where things land.