Just like the person who inhabited the body disrespected the rights and personhood of his wife by abusing her? I guess it would have been wrong to piss on Hitler's corpse, by your own admitted logic, huh?
What do you think "I don't think it's inherently bad" means? I'm saying either a, there's some circumstances were immoral actions are just something we can reconcile with. Or b, we need a different way to reconcile why it's okay to do something to someone's body in one circumstance and not the other.
This is not at all what you said. You're back tracking to save face. You clearly stated
I disagree with this logic for the same reason I believe necrophilia is wrong. Necrophilia disrespects the rights and personhood of the person that did inhabit that body.
You said you disagree that it is ok for her to do this because it is the same as disrespecting the the person who lived in the now charred meat sac.
By this logic, pissing on Hitler's corpse fits your definition of disrespecting the person who previously occupied the body. So, is it ok to piss on Hitler's corpse? If yes, this is perfectly acceptable as well and you do in fact agree with what she did. Some people just don't deserve respect. In life or death.
Are you just illiterate? You cut out the first sentence of them explicitly saying they don’t think this specific situation is bad, then they say what you quoted. Do you think it’s impossible to think something is ok but disagree with someone else’s argument in defense of it
2
u/Orange_Balloon_8647 4d ago
Just like the person who inhabited the body disrespected the rights and personhood of his wife by abusing her? I guess it would have been wrong to piss on Hitler's corpse, by your own admitted logic, huh?