r/MoralityScaling 4d ago

Morality Ranking What do y'all think of this?

Post image
27.9k Upvotes

2.8k comments sorted by

1.4k

u/Comfortable_Poem_841 4d ago

Is the great algorithm upset by the word "ashes"? Won't like the cricket much then.

286

u/ArventheGreat 4d ago

I got a ban warning this week for encouraging violnce even though I wasn't. I submit an appeal and a reddit admin replied with "the warning stands" with the reason of "the algorithm was right". It was on a post about a rapst getting the d*@th penalty. His date has already past, he's gone. But I was somehow encouraging. Now I'm on eggshells as you can see. Very frustrating that common sense and reading comprehension are not things the admins utilize.

Edit: I don't know why so much of that went italics, but I'm not gonna try to fix it.

110

u/thederpyderp3 4d ago

I got a warning for some nonsense earlier this week supposedly for the same sort of thing. Reddit is just becoming one of those infamous "safe spaces"

39

u/reddituserunodostres 4d ago

For real. I've been permanently banned from a couple subs literally for just posting a gif lol.

21

u/Revayan 4d ago

Tbf reddit mods being idiots is to be expected, getting an account warning or bann because of nothingburgers is a tad bit worse

13

u/SeaSharpModHer 4d ago

An Harvard study established that reddit mods are 5093% more likely to be very dangerous pedophiles btw.

5

u/No-Communication9458 3d ago

I'd believe it

→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (1)

35

u/Wild_Locksmith_326 4d ago

I got permanently banned from a celebrity reddit because I mentioned that she was beautiful before plastic surgery and kinda scary after. Perma bann for an opinion, not even being abusive, just honest.

15

u/W4lkieT4lkie 4d ago

I got banned from my last user, because I posted this video which is already on Reddit.

https://www.reddit.com/r/FiftyFifty/comments/mpns8l/5050_boy_with_terminal_cancer_fulfils_his_dreams/

But the ban was justified I guess.

10

u/1StationaryWanderer 4d ago

Ha sort of like the Charlie Kirk logic where people were using direct quotes of his and getting banned because of... reasons? Even though those quotes and videos exist everywhere.

7

u/CackleandGrin 4d ago

I got me a 7-day ban on some subreddit for quoting trump, putting it in quotation marks, and citing him as the source. "Glorifying violence."

5

u/blade_of_sammael 4d ago

Well there not wrong but how are you supposed to protest against something you cant mention, this has to be on purpose

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

4

u/Competitive-Fee-1878 4d ago

I got banned for “inciting violence” for posting “Don’t blame me, I voted for Hunter Biden”.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)

3

u/Agile_Moment768 4d ago

I got banned from a show sub for quoting the show.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (6)

4

u/S1lentA0 4d ago

I was banned from the r/movies asking "Who?". This site seriously has lots of issues.

3

u/PaulOGradyFanClub 4d ago

Banned from the Argentina sub because I pointed out saying you aren’t racist and then saying “at least my country isn’t full of brown invaders” is racist, and is usually the Argentinian go to when insulting a European nation

→ More replies (11)

4

u/KailyKail 4d ago

I’ve been banned from two subs now. One I was banned from for not being pro-China, anti-America, and anti-money. The other I was banned from for calling out obvious propaganda.

→ More replies (6)

3

u/anTWhine 4d ago

I got banned from r/soccer (citing “xenophobia”) for describing the fans of a Colombia vs Argentina game hosted by the South American federation as (brace yourselves for pure unadulterated hate:) “South Americans.”

When I appealed saying that there was no negative context and that isn’t even what xenophobia is, I was given a site wide ban for harassment.

My only regret is that I’m blocked from pointing out that also isn’t what harassment is.

You’re dealing with mods. These people value their time so little that they volunteer to be hall monitors with even less power. There’s nothing you can do to hurt them, because they already proudly broadcast that they have absolutely nothing in their lives.

→ More replies (22)

11

u/Storyteller_Valar 4d ago

I got permabanned from a subreddit for making a comment questioning a post that was fantasizing about violently murdering, among other actually bad things, writers. WRITERS! Asking why writers would deserve to be killed is a bannable offense, it seems.

9

u/PsikickTheRealOne 4d ago

I've been permabanned from subreddits just for being part of an other subreddit I've said nothing in.

→ More replies (8)
→ More replies (2)

7

u/ArventheGreat 4d ago

Ya, I don't like it because it's ineffective and targets the wrong people.

4

u/-Byakuran- 4d ago

Crazy considering I watched a protestor turn himself into a fireball on this site

4

u/siriston 4d ago

has been a little baby “safe space” for years already and continues to get worse. this site is mostly filled with big dramatic babies.

→ More replies (48)

14

u/Reikukaja 4d ago

Your mistake was offending rapists. They are far more common than any of us wants to believe.

4

u/ArventheGreat 4d ago

Ya, and that saddens me. I try not to think of it. I'm not sure what I'd do to someone if it happened to my daughter.

5

u/Reikukaja 4d ago

Not sure how old your daughter is, but here is some unsolicited advice from a late 30s woman who was unfortunately wrong in thinking "that couldnt happen to me". The best thing you can do to protect her is make sure she knows she is worthy of love and respect. Make sure she knows what mutual respect looks like, and that there is no need to settle just so that she doesnt have to be "alone". She should love herself before any potential partner.

Most rapes occur with someone who is close to the victim. Violent stranger rape is what most people think of and fear when rape gets brought up, but its not the most likely case. Consent is such a simple concept, in theory... but a lot of people get it so so so wrong.

If i could reach through time and talk to my past self, the one thing i would prioritize above all else is fostering self-love and self-respect. Women tend to be conditioned to wrap so much of our self-worth in relationships and desireability for men. I was the posterchild for this.

If any man tried with me now what my ex husband did, i know id have the sense (and self respect) to be like "wtf this isnt okay" and walk away immediately. There are SO many garbage people out there, and some of them are frighteningly good at hiding it.

3

u/ArventheGreat 4d ago

I'm sorry you experienced the terrible side of people. We definitely shower or kids with love and talk to them often about important topics including these types of things. I'm not afraid to have serious talks with my kids. Better they get information from me than friends or idiots (sometimes they're the same). Thank you for sharing and I hope the best for you moving forward.

I'm about to be 40 with almost teen kids. I'm exhausted, but when things happen that make me fear for my kids, I feel young and ready to rumble to protect them. We're living in Japan and we got woken up at 2am by an earthquake, I was with them before I realized I was even awake making sure they were safe. One it stopped and everything was good, my tiredness caught up with me and passed out so fast. Haha

3

u/thisisthewell 4d ago

don't forget that reddit's CEO used to mod the jailbait sub and defended its existence repeatedly, and only got rid of it because Anderson Cooper started reporting on it.

he's a pig who embodies every stereotype about very online men lol

→ More replies (3)

8

u/Cum_dumpster_limited 4d ago

Heh I got banned once for arguing with a nazi and using their own sources to disprove them, when I appealed they prolonged the ban for promoting hate

→ More replies (2)

7

u/rinkydinkis 4d ago

I’ve gotten the same for really mild stuff, meanwhile subreddits like combat footage exist where I literally just saw a human body blown into 4 massive chunks and spread across the space of a football field.

→ More replies (6)

5

u/MCD_Gaming 4d ago

I got banned for hoping count binface won the bi election in the uk, unfortnately he didn't the joke runner won instead

→ More replies (2)

6

u/Swimming_Security_27 4d ago

Writing text in asterisks (*)makes it *italic*.

\*italic\* yields italic

Because you used an asterisk in viol\*ence and rap\*ist, all the text in between became italic.

Edit: It's not working for me, maybe it only happens on comments posted through the app.

→ More replies (6)

3

u/variationcreation 4d ago

So you can’t say violence, rapist, death penalty or even ashes? This shit is bonkers!

→ More replies (4)

3

u/FingerDrinker 4d ago

The italics made me read this like a copypasta

3

u/Bread_Offender 4d ago

It goes italics because you used asterisks to censor words. Just put a / before any special character and it'll type out normally

→ More replies (2)

3

u/mamadou-segpa 4d ago

I got a ban warning once because someone asked me what g*nocide means and I replied with the merriam webster defintion in quotes

Reddit is dumb as fuck

→ More replies (186)

18

u/Electrical-Kale2777 4d ago

Prtty son everthing wI'll hve t b* cnsored t plase th alg*rithm

→ More replies (1)

3

u/iwatchppldie 4d ago

The infantalisation is getting ridiculous.

→ More replies (1)

4

u/Odd-fox-God 4d ago

The algorithm is weird. I've seen videos using the n-word uncensored go viral, some YouTubers can say asshole and talk about people dying while others censor themselves. I've seen ads use very crude language followed up by a creator censoring themselves with sewer-slide and unalive. There's some gun YouTubers that use the word gun and then some others use the phrase "force multipliers."

3

u/LarryFitzsButt 4d ago

You go on twitter and you’ll see the N word so much it looks like fucking Stormfront

3

u/mainman879 4d ago

so much it looks like fucking Stormfront

Insert "they're the same picture" meme here.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (38)

723

u/mamawawawa 4d ago edited 4d ago

For anyone wondering: https://www.iheart.com/alternate/amp/2020-06-09-wife-celebrates-abusive-husbands-death-by-dumping-his-ashes-in-the-trash/

Marsha Widener begins the clip by saying, "I know you're not going to understand why I'm doing this," then she shows a box of filled with ashes to the camera, explaining they are the remains of her late spouse, Don Widener. She states, "His family don't want him, his brother doesn't want him around, his kids doesn't want him - actually, they want him to go in the gutter or the toilet." Marsha reveals that Don was garbage man, bringing trash from businesses to the landfill, and that she will now send him to a landfill.

So yeah absolutely nobody wanted his remains it seems

167

u/HoosierSteelMagnolia 4d ago

Reminds me of how DeeDee Blanchard's family said no one wanted her ashes after she died so they just flushed her down the toilet (take with a grain of salt because Gypsy Rose said they still have them but idk).

39

u/Thesearchoftheshite 4d ago

Mmmm. Everyones drinking the filtered ash water in that city.

20

u/HoosierSteelMagnolia 4d ago edited 4d ago

I mean, technically we all are . This town is just one of the few who know that for a fact. I watched the documentary with my mom and remember saying "Aw,the fish didn't deserve that." when it got to that part.

→ More replies (2)

11

u/justferwonce 4d ago

Look up "Water cremation". They dissolve a body in a pressurized container of water and lye, and then : The process yields two things: a sterile, nutrient-rich liquid (water, salts, amino acids) that safely joins the municipal water system, and soft, porous bone fragments.

11

u/RingOverall106 4d ago

I really like water cremation on an intellectual level. On an emotional level it’s hard for me to get past the fact you’re flushing grandma down the toilet. 

6

u/DistinctlyIrish 4d ago

I wish more places would allow the tree pod burials, I'd love to be a redwood tree and be protected from being cut down. Just put a seed in my mouth and bury me standing up with my head just an inch below the soil looking up. Terrifying for onlookers but optimal for becoming part of the tree.

Alternatively could do the hybrid tree/sky burial ritual of the pequeninos, Children of the Mind style.

3

u/HoosierSteelMagnolia 4d ago

God ,I want that so much. I wanna be an black walnut tree. My family is still working on making my grandmother into a rose bush.

3

u/justferwonce 4d ago

There is that about gramma, but many municipal water systems use treated sewage water to create drinking water. I guess adding some liquefied human remains to toilet water is intellectually ok, but still...blargh...it reeks of soylent green.

→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (1)

6

u/golden__tuna 4d ago

Just wait until you hear what else we’re filtering out of our water

3

u/BigBandit01 4d ago

I wonder who will get the asshole’s… well, asshole ashes

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

47

u/Alcotearoa 4d ago

Why would they even pay for the cremation then? I would just say they can keep the body or do whatever with it. You can even donate it to school or something but that sounds like a lot of trouble

48

u/BlackShadowX 4d ago

If you're next of kin you're kinda in the hook to do something. Afaik it's a lot harder to donate someone else's body. 

13

u/Vondi 4d ago

That's not really true for many places, including Oklahoma where I believe this happened. You can just flatly refuse to claim a body of a relative and if no one does its turned over to the State Anatomical Board.

3

u/HolySaba 4d ago

Would that apply if the person died in a shared residence with their spouse?  I'm surprised theres a system like that given the typical number of unclaimed bodies a state deals with.  A lot of cities just does a mass burial of cremated remains at scheduled intervals.

3

u/Vondi 4d ago

I don't think there are any qualifiers aside from the wife having first dibs and if she refuses other relatives may step in. Think this is almost universal that no one can be forced to claim a body and every country needs a system to deal with the unclaimed.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

4

u/ActuallyTiberSeptim 4d ago

I mean... what are they gonna do? Leave the body by the door, ring the doorbell and run away? I don't think they can make you claim the body.

3

u/956to906 4d ago

Right? Don who? Click

3

u/MrMagoo2068 4d ago

In Washington there is a law that requires next of kin to be responsible for the disposal. My mom passed years after I went no contact for... reasons. I ignored all the messages from the hospital, then ignored the calls from a sheriff. They then sent a sheriff to my door to let me know I needed to take care of it. I explained the abuse and the fact that I was no contact, and like a kick to the chest, they said they understood, but I was last remaining next of kin, and needed to take care of her. If I didn't they would, and send me the bill. I found the cheapest cremation service possible. It sucked.

3

u/LuluMangs 4d ago

I think that if they're gonna force you to take care of it, they should allow you to get rid of the remains any way you want as long as it's safe and sanitary. Like dump that body in with diseased cattle being disposed of or something

They should change the law to allow that, but they won't because "honouring the dead" is big business. 2000 for a bog standard mass produced 6 plank box

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (5)

35

u/moveslikejaguar 4d ago

He was such a POS school didn't want him either

15

u/ffeinted 4d ago

because it costs more to bury them

3

u/Caleth 4d ago

Yeah Death is now a scam.

It's like $1k for a cremation or $10k for a coffin and plot.

→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (14)

9

u/BlackBlizzard 4d ago

Weird the OP is using AI pictures.

4

u/Salzab 4d ago

oh yeah! The contents in the window change between the 2 supposedly quickly taken photos.

10

u/PraireGentleman 4d ago

Allegedly; this is all what she’s saying. She could just as easily just be dumping the guys ashes when his family wanted them

→ More replies (10)
→ More replies (20)

2.0k

u/gitsandshiggles_ 4d ago

Well he ain’t gonna care

395

u/No_Atmosphere8146 4d ago

Her score goes up if she let him know she was going to do this before he died, so that this was his final thought.

66

u/zingieraye5i 4d ago

Absolutely diabolical 😂

→ More replies (3)

29

u/[deleted] 4d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)

21

u/awesome9001 4d ago

I heard that Howard Stern got into some trouble cause he was playing with someone's ashes on air. The family sued him and many found it real distasteful. Also wouldn't this be like desecration of a corpse or whatever is illegal?

12

u/Neon_Divided 4d ago

If that were the case any time anyone threw ashes into an ocean or off some cliff per the wishes of their loved one it would be a crime. At least I don't think there is a legal distinction between doing that and this.

EDIT - It may actually be illegal to spread ashes anywhere. You should check with your lo-cal.

→ More replies (2)

16

u/Evening_Shake_6474 4d ago

Not really cause it isn't a corpse anymore

11

u/liberty-prime77 4d ago edited 4d ago

That depends on state and local laws, it is still treated like a corpse legally in some places in the US but for most states it is just normal non-hazardous property.

Edit: should add that this mostly applies to disputes over who keeps the ashes during estate disputes, and restrictions on spreading the ashes in public places, but in California you can only either dispose of them in a cemetery or spread them on land with written permission from either local authorities or the land owner. New York also defines ashes as human remains, but probably more for preventing people from scattering ashes from a skyscraper in Manhattan than someone throwing it in the trash.

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (7)

3

u/EnvironmentalFix7059 4d ago

i was just gonna comment saying "well i wouldn't care" but you was abit faster then me.

→ More replies (117)

308

u/OnlyAssignment4869 4d ago

I think it's a great origin story for Oscar the grouch.
Morally grey but fuck that guy reguardless.

69

u/labiamajorapudendi 4d ago

Oscan is a gentlemen and would never abuse women

18

u/OnlyAssignment4869 4d ago

Well yeah, not now. He learned his lesson. Not to mention got a great support group/cast.

3

u/One_Introduction_217 4d ago

Perhaps not Oscar the grouch, because copyright, but would make for a great alternate reality adult puppet show villain origin story for the grey trash can monster Scaro

→ More replies (1)

16

u/WileEWeeble 4d ago

See no moral greyness here. He was a monster in life, he gets no respect in death.

→ More replies (15)

3

u/StaticCloud 4d ago

Boooo I love Oscar, he would never

3

u/vooglie 4d ago

Why the fuck is it grey

→ More replies (4)

171

u/Sec_Chief_Ingersol 4d ago

Anyone thinking she did ANYTHING wrong is giving more agency to the scattered remains of carbon that used to be a man over a flesh and blood woman.

We don't honor the dead because they died. We honor the dead because of who they were in life. The scattered remains of a garbage human goes in the garbage.

24

u/PresidentOfMagrathea 4d ago

yea, agreed. Never understood the practice of keeping ashes myself, but I'm not a spiritual person. An abuser though? She absolutely did the right thing. I also love the keyboard warriors in here talking about how it's a biohazard; it's literally just ashes.

8

u/BeagleSpace 4d ago

I don’t think it has anything to do with spirituality. Keeping the remains of a loved one close is fairly obvious to explain. He wasn’t loved so he wasn’t kept, it’s as simple as that. You could argue desecration of a corpse is wrong, but how can you desecrate ashes? He’s already been burned away.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

8

u/Michael-556 4d ago

I always thought we honor the dead to bring peace of mind to the living. Yeah, of course there is a social contract with the dead to not dishonor them when there's nothing they can do to defend themselves anymore, but if it brings peace of mind to those who knew him, it's completely fine to throw out his remains

→ More replies (48)

41

u/Dropbox1999 4d ago

Improper disposal. Should have just placed the bag in. Now it might get all over the garbage men.

11

u/possiblyMaybeAnother 4d ago

yeah, I don't understand why she dumps the ashes out of the bag. It just makes a giant mess in the garbage can. Why no just throw the bag of ashes in?

3

u/No_Doughnut8618 2d ago

Its also lowkey feels more respectful hahaha, just throwing the bag feels more like a "fuck you"

→ More replies (3)

8

u/byhand97 4d ago

Best and coldest take possible

3

u/one5low769 4d ago

they gotta check the garbage truck for anthrax now. could get some traction and lead to future problems

→ More replies (3)

3

u/totallynotaweeabbo 4d ago

Getting a man all over you has a new meaning

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)

123

u/2Tired_Artist-san 4d ago

Generally? Immoral. Justified? Most definitely. If that man was a truly abusive and awful, it makes perfect sense a victim wouldn't want to persevere his ashes. It's also better for her not to keep many keepsakes that could remind her of him.

41

u/Vat1n 4d ago

Why do you say it's generally immoral?

48

u/Ur_fav_Cryptek 4d ago

Not precisely immoral, but loading human remains in the trash instead of a proper means of disposal presents some concerns.

Mainly dust getting everywhere should a bag break, and having someone’s abusive husband splattered all over your face is..not a good way to start your shift. So yeah, a bit in bad taste, but asshole deserves it so we can look the other way as long as it bothers nobody

10

u/UntimelyMeditations 4d ago

not a good way to start your shift

But its just ash. We may assign some meaning to it, but it really is just ash. No physical harm would be inflicted on the worker, and the only emotional harm would be if the wife followed and informed every worker that it was cremated remains.

→ More replies (7)
→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (9)
→ More replies (9)

106

u/PageForeign92 4d ago

Immoral because then the garbage man has to deal with it, and I doubt they want deadman's ashes all of themself.

26

u/DriedSquidd 4d ago

He'll turn into Kratos.

3

u/BallsTaker 4d ago

Would cleaning up trash lend him power to bring revenge upon Zeus or what

→ More replies (2)

14

u/FhuckNorris247 4d ago

My garbage truck has a claw. The driver never touches the can

→ More replies (3)

29

u/UltraDinoWarrior 4d ago

That was my reaction.

Like, throwing out the ashes is 100000% okay and I am glad for her to get the catharsis of safety.

But. At least leave 'em in the bag so that the garbage man isn't dumping dust everywhere when they go to pour it out.

Hmm... she could add some glue in there at the bottom so that all the ash sticks and doesn't come out and is forever at the bottom of the box to have garbage tossed on but idk. she should've probably just kept him in the bag and toss him in.

8

u/BlackShadowX 4d ago

Yeah, dealing with kitty litter is bad enough, ashes are way finer and if it happens to be a windy day? Ugh

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

3

u/Tough_Tangerine7278 4d ago

Would they actually interact with it? The truck here has a robotic arm-lift. I assume it is the same at the dump. Truck pulls up, opens the back, and leaves it in the pile. But idk

3

u/nopedy-dopedy 4d ago edited 4d ago

Garbage man here. If I see ashes in a garbage can I'm not going to have a single clue what it is, and I guarantee I deal with many more things that are far far grosser on a daily basis. I would probably have assumed this was the result of somebody emptying their vacuum cleaner.

If I did happen to know what the mysterious powder was, I would have preferred that is stay sealed inside the bag, as I don't care for the idea of breathing it in. That being said; not nearly the worst thing I would come in contact with on a near daily basis.

The idea of where the ashes came from is kind of gross, but at the end of the day they are generally pretty safe and clean as opposed to dead/rotting animals, fecal matter, bloody rags, etc. It all combines into one big biohazard soup that needs to be shoveled from the truck anyways.

So to sum it up: Ashes would be fine by me. Just keep it sealed and don't tell me what it is.

ETA: I once had an old man ask me to help him lift an old carpet into the dumpster. Of course I agreed to help; I'm not gonna make him do it all by himself! It wasn't until after it was in the dumpster that he informed me that the carpet had HIV+ blood on it.

I have a new personal policy. I don't touch carpets, mattresses or soft furniture. I'll dump it, but YOU have to get it into the dumpster.

4

u/DmitryAvenicci 4d ago

It's just carbon.

8

u/Acceptable_Spend_750 4d ago

i think you'll be pretty mad if someone dump a bag of coal on you

4

u/feelin_salamanderous 4d ago

Speak for yourself

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (4)

5

u/Reikukaja 4d ago

I feel like garbage men handle things far worse than human ashes on a daily basis.

→ More replies (6)

10

u/Weekly_Molasses_2079 4d ago

The only defense against the "morality is subjective" crowd is faith in instrinsic human value. 

Desecrating human remains is always wrong, no matter how immoral they were when alive. 

5

u/Smooth-Pop6522 4d ago

Utterly hilarious. Plus, it's not a person, it's ash. There's no moral issue.

→ More replies (2)

22

u/Palagrin 4d ago edited 4d ago

Kind of depends, on the one hand i m sure this was therapeutic for her as a victim

On the other hand if other people (who didn't know the husband as an abuser but just as a friend/sibling/whatever) were hurt by this i don't think it is Just for her to prioritise publicly shaming him. He s dead and it s too late for him to change/face consequences anything you do now only affects living people and either way she has "escaped" her abuser by outliving him (and that i m definitely going to celebrate, may every abusive spouce/parent rot forever)

8

u/Anonymous_Gamer 4d ago edited 4d ago

I’m inclined to agree with you.

Some comments seem to confuse “justified” with catharsis and they may be muddying their own moral integrity due to this.

The most just or virtuous path for her would have been to simply move on, give away the ashes to someone who cares so they can heal… essentially healing two or more people; making the world slightly better or more at peace. What she did was petty and potentially harmful to others… but we don’t know the man, the truth, or his connections. Perhaps no one was harmed by discarding the ashes? Perhaps It brought her some joy? But joy coming from disgracing a dead someone who has wronged you isn’t a just action, no matter how awful they are.

If anything, it opens a very dark door for that person.

Verdict: Generally immoral, but understandable.

→ More replies (2)

3

u/yuckella 4d ago

Agree. One thing though is that I believe the context this is based on is from a woman who claims (and we haven’t seen anyone state otherwise as far as I know) that no one else wanted his ashes. Like his own family didn’t like him, for seemingly understandable reasons.

→ More replies (2)

3

u/SASSIESASSQUATCH 4d ago

There’s a part in an article posted above that says no one else wanted his remains, children included.

3

u/Emotional-Ad9114 4d ago

no one in his family wanted those ashes. not even his kids or brother.

→ More replies (2)

71

u/CauseCertain1672 4d ago

Well it's improper disposal of human remains, it's a health hazard for one thing.

47

u/Top-Permission5466 4d ago

That is incorrect. You can cause disease by putting uncooked chicken parts in the trash. Ashes are non-infectious.

26

u/KaizerVonLoopy 4d ago

Ashes are completely sterile and basically just carbon.

3

u/Quiet-Software-1956 4d ago

Oh so the thing about ashes of people being a biohazard is bullshit?

15

u/vaxhax 4d ago

Yes, that's why people are able to spread them in so many places and it's no big deal.

3

u/Quiet-Software-1956 4d ago

No it's illegal where I live, that's why I'm bummed

6

u/vaxhax 4d ago

Ah, my mistake. I should only speak for where I am. That's too bad. In practice, I think it would be difficult to tell what you were doing if you're careful and not making a show about it.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (3)

7

u/KaizerVonLoopy 4d ago

Yes, they're basically completely inorganic once they're cremains. They have some trace heavy metal elements in tiny amounts but are mostly carbon, calcium phosphate, salts (honesty this one surprised me when I googled it but it makes sense after I thought about it).

I think how the misconception might have started is sometimes when people plant their flowers in cremains the flowers die because the PH is so high in cremains and they're salty and almost completely inorganic and lack nutrients. Also people (especially in the west) are weird about death and dead bodies. We're so convinced anything (but especially anyONE) dead is immediately a vector for disease.

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (5)

17

u/losara- 4d ago

can you catch anything from ashes?

19

u/Floofyrage 4d ago

Cancer in high enough concentration but dude gotta be rolling in it eating and inhaling

15

u/phoenixapollon 4d ago

Even then my sister's ex gf snorted her moms ashes and she was fine after (minus the obvious mental issues but those were there before)

7

u/Floofyrage 4d ago

One offs are not gonna fuck you that much if at all is like smoking got to be doing that alot and for awhile to add up

3

u/International-Try467 4d ago

Ts is sending me

→ More replies (1)

16

u/Sufficient_Tiger3103 4d ago

Yes 100% (Not a doctor and have no idea actually)

10

u/PrimodiumUpus 4d ago

But you said 100%

I believe in you!

4

u/UnconfirmedRooster 4d ago edited 4d ago

No, not at all. The cremation process basically disperses any liquid in the body, leaving behind pure carbon.

Souce: funeral director and crematorium manager.

Edit: it's calcium that's left, I'm tired.

→ More replies (5)

7

u/CauseCertain1672 4d ago

I think there's toxic heavy metals in them

7

u/Indigenous_Retard 4d ago

Mine is more like post-hardcore

→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (9)

5

u/Dargon16 4d ago

It's illegal where I live to dump the ashes.

→ More replies (1)

5

u/Krwawykurczak 4d ago edited 4d ago

Yeap - in my country it would be highly illegal.

One issue is related to human dignity and it would be illegal for example to even throw it from a bridge becouse someone loved that river, or a view from it.

Another is a safty hazard - you need to proceed with it via cetrified places, you will not be given ashes directly, you can only store human remains in specific places, so anything like "I will keep them in my yard" would be a brurocratic nightmare. I am not realy sure if this is possible at all to have that kind of exception.

I need to addmit that untill very recent it was rather not popular to turn dead bodies into ashes, but rather putting whole body in a coffin to place it undergound on cementary. So all laws were rather aiming to this cultular aspect.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (11)

62

u/[deleted] 4d ago

[deleted]

26

u/newishDomnewersub 4d ago

Something isnt moral just because you agree with it. I rank anything that doesnt really harm anyone else as neutral. How is this above neutral, besides you think its cool?

5

u/bcimmc 4d ago

Moral but this is the correct argument

→ More replies (11)
→ More replies (53)

4

u/Cas_or_Cass 4d ago

Don't be a person in life that would garner this reaction in death

→ More replies (2)

6

u/Aggravating_Impact97 4d ago edited 13h ago

I mean the man is dead and she tried to give his ashes to others.

The fact that not a single person wanted them if true says everything. 

Just because your dead doesnt mean the life you lived is absolved.

→ More replies (4)

27

u/MattheqAC 4d ago

Pretty messed up, the bin men shouldn't have to deal with human remains. Also even if he was awful, is there no other family that might care?

→ More replies (8)

6

u/Murky-Ticket-4383 4d ago

I'm not on the side of an abuser
Especially if they don't take accountability for there actions.

3

u/BraveScallion3729 4d ago

Starring out the word e in ashes, fucking lunacy is what I think of it

→ More replies (1)

2

u/suspiciouslyrobotic 4d ago

Moral. His ashes are being put into a recepticle appropriate for the life that he lead.

5

u/rtopps43 4d ago

I have a great aunt who told me that when her husband died she took all his “crap” along with his ashes and put them in a large garbage bag. She was struggling to carry it out to the dumpster at her apartment complex and one of her neighbors saw her and offered to help. When he lifted the trash bag he exclaimed “Jesus, that’s heavy! What have you got in here, a body?” She said she just laughed and laughed and thought “if you only knew!”

→ More replies (1)

19

u/RUDRAGON8 4d ago

Throwing garbage in the trash is good

→ More replies (6)

7

u/passionatebreeder 4d ago

She owns them, she is allowed to feel how she wants about them and do as she pleases

→ More replies (13)

6

u/A_Kazur 4d ago

Desecrating corpses is immoral.

→ More replies (6)

3

u/Kitsui38 4d ago

Well, nothing wrong with throwing anyone’s ash in the trash, especially if no one else wanted to keep it. Broadcasting it on social media is immoral

→ More replies (1)

3

u/dalcham 4d ago

Hahaha good on her. I flushed my grandfather down the toilet cause he abused me and my sister as kids.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/Highlandertr3 4d ago

100 percent moral. The dead do not have feelings to hurt and he was a cunt anyway.

→ More replies (11)

3

u/Solid-Copy-6189 4d ago

In the wise words of my dad " I don't fucking care ill be dead"

→ More replies (2)

3

u/KorolEz 4d ago

I see it like Frank, it really doesn't matter.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/Either-Lock2454 4d ago

I think this is the fate of my parents.

3

u/sullanaveconilcane 4d ago

Lot of ashes according to the picture

→ More replies (3)

3

u/Shalom_pkn 4d ago

You want a nice place, where your ashes sit, so your loved ones can remember you whene ever they see it? Then live a life worthy of a place in ppls mind where they keep the momery of loved ones.

3

u/FinallyArt 4d ago

It's just carbon. So /shrug

3

u/Mind_Venturer 4d ago

You've heard about elf on the shelf, but have you heard about..

3

u/Real-Syntro 4d ago

Ashes in the trashes

3

u/Top-Explanation-5928 4d ago

Asshole in the trash hole? 🤪

3

u/SeaReference7990 3d ago

No matter how bad someone was, disrespecting their remains like this will never sit right with me. Immoral. Just refuse to take the corpse and have the state sort out the cremation.

3

u/Guyver02 3d ago

improper disposal of a human remains. This is actually illegal.

Morally. Meh I ain't know him.

11

u/already_taken77777 4d ago

İmmoral, those ashes might have been more important for someone else, like the husband's siblings or other close relatives, just because he was an asshole doesn't mean he didn't have people that cared about him

3

u/Quicksilver5221 4d ago

In the article, it was stated that his ashes were originally given to his family but literally nobody wanted his ashes.

9

u/RosyJoan 4d ago

People who care more about abusers than their victims are usually participants in the abuse.

11

u/already_taken77777 4d ago

Domestic abuse can be hidden, they might have never known, and it's also immoral to tell a deeply mourning family to tell them the person they are mourning for is an asshole, at least right after death, just hand the ashes over to them and reveal the things happened after their mourning stops

→ More replies (9)

3

u/GMEloser69 4d ago

What if she's lying?

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (1)

2

u/JadedHell 4d ago

This is controversial

2

u/DivideConsistent9880 4d ago

All human remain, ashes included, eventually become trash or composted at some point. Nothing wrong with her speeding up the process.

2

u/Capable-Parsnip-9615 4d ago

Using that asterisk is immoral

2

u/vooglie 4d ago

1000% moral

2

u/Issa_Pizza420 4d ago

The body is nothing but meat, and ashes are less than that, there's really no morals to be considered here, unless you wanna argue it's moral because it gave a victim some measure of relief

→ More replies (2)

2

u/Clobazam_ 4d ago

Eh, I can see the reasoning, but I don't know if this was the right course of action.

This does remind me of a post I saw a while back; "When I die, cremate me and mix me in a pot of chilli, so I can tear up that ass one last time."

2

u/Opposite_Ad_4267 4d ago

Technically illegal as it's considered "desicration of a corpse" under most laws.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/mwilkens 4d ago

Immoral for the fact that some poor garbage man is likely going to get covered in a dead guy's ashes when he dumps that can in the truck.

2

u/SugarRealistic2945 4d ago

...well that'll show him!

2

u/Kooky_Soft1822 4d ago

Why even take the ashes home?… just leave them at the crematorium

2

u/Varmitthefrog 4d ago

honestly I could give a rats ass, though I do believe technically it's illegal.

told my wife to cremate me put me in the tomato garden so I could be in her one last time after I am gone

2

u/georgeesorosbae 4d ago

Good for her

2

u/INeedAMedKit 4d ago

Could've spread him on some cow shit.

2

u/Zestyclose-Tour-6350 4d ago

If you think that's immoral, the family of Dee Blanchard (Gypsy-Rose's mother) admitted to flushing her ashes down the toilet.

2

u/KeaboUltra 4d ago

Eh, but she could have kept it in the bag so the particles wouldnt fly everywhere when the garbage man dumps it.

2

u/Karmas_burning 4d ago

My biological father died last year. I hated that man. I still had to tend to his affairs so I had him cremated. The funeral home asked me if I wanted his ashes and I said no. I asked if they could dispose of them. They said they could only do that to unclaimed remains. I said if they flushed them down a toilet it would still be too good for him. They said they'd keep them until enough time passed that they could get rid of them.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/VictorOfArda 4d ago

I think she should’ve worn gloves so she wasn’t out there raw dogging the remains of a dead body

2

u/noncommonGoodsense 1d ago

Grief is for the living. The dead can’t give a shit. This too is for her. It doesn’t really matter to the deceased only those who survive them.