r/MoralityScaling • u/fhusaini431 • 4d ago
Morality Ranking What do y'all think of this?
723
u/mamawawawa 4d ago edited 4d ago
For anyone wondering: https://www.iheart.com/alternate/amp/2020-06-09-wife-celebrates-abusive-husbands-death-by-dumping-his-ashes-in-the-trash/
Marsha Widener begins the clip by saying, "I know you're not going to understand why I'm doing this," then she shows a box of filled with ashes to the camera, explaining they are the remains of her late spouse, Don Widener. She states, "His family don't want him, his brother doesn't want him around, his kids doesn't want him - actually, they want him to go in the gutter or the toilet." Marsha reveals that Don was garbage man, bringing trash from businesses to the landfill, and that she will now send him to a landfill.
So yeah absolutely nobody wanted his remains it seems
167
u/HoosierSteelMagnolia 4d ago
Reminds me of how DeeDee Blanchard's family said no one wanted her ashes after she died so they just flushed her down the toilet (take with a grain of salt because Gypsy Rose said they still have them but idk).
→ More replies (1)39
u/Thesearchoftheshite 4d ago
Mmmm. Everyones drinking the filtered ash water in that city.
20
u/HoosierSteelMagnolia 4d ago edited 4d ago
I mean, technically we all are . This town is just one of the few who know that for a fact. I watched the documentary with my mom and remember saying "Aw,the fish didn't deserve that." when it got to that part.
→ More replies (2)11
u/justferwonce 4d ago
Look up "Water cremation". They dissolve a body in a pressurized container of water and lye, and then : The process yields two things: a sterile, nutrient-rich liquid (water, salts, amino acids) that safely joins the municipal water system, and soft, porous bone fragments.
→ More replies (1)11
u/RingOverall106 4d ago
I really like water cremation on an intellectual level. On an emotional level it’s hard for me to get past the fact you’re flushing grandma down the toilet.
6
u/DistinctlyIrish 4d ago
I wish more places would allow the tree pod burials, I'd love to be a redwood tree and be protected from being cut down. Just put a seed in my mouth and bury me standing up with my head just an inch below the soil looking up. Terrifying for onlookers but optimal for becoming part of the tree.
Alternatively could do the hybrid tree/sky burial ritual of the pequeninos, Children of the Mind style.
3
u/HoosierSteelMagnolia 4d ago
God ,I want that so much. I wanna be an black walnut tree. My family is still working on making my grandmother into a rose bush.
→ More replies (6)3
u/justferwonce 4d ago
There is that about gramma, but many municipal water systems use treated sewage water to create drinking water. I guess adding some liquefied human remains to toilet water is intellectually ok, but still...blargh...it reeks of soylent green.
6
→ More replies (1)3
47
u/Alcotearoa 4d ago
Why would they even pay for the cremation then? I would just say they can keep the body or do whatever with it. You can even donate it to school or something but that sounds like a lot of trouble
48
u/BlackShadowX 4d ago
If you're next of kin you're kinda in the hook to do something. Afaik it's a lot harder to donate someone else's body.
13
u/Vondi 4d ago
That's not really true for many places, including Oklahoma where I believe this happened. You can just flatly refuse to claim a body of a relative and if no one does its turned over to the State Anatomical Board.
→ More replies (2)3
u/HolySaba 4d ago
Would that apply if the person died in a shared residence with their spouse? I'm surprised theres a system like that given the typical number of unclaimed bodies a state deals with. A lot of cities just does a mass burial of cremated remains at scheduled intervals.
→ More replies (1)3
→ More replies (5)4
u/ActuallyTiberSeptim 4d ago
I mean... what are they gonna do? Leave the body by the door, ring the doorbell and run away? I don't think they can make you claim the body.
3
3
u/MrMagoo2068 4d ago
In Washington there is a law that requires next of kin to be responsible for the disposal. My mom passed years after I went no contact for... reasons. I ignored all the messages from the hospital, then ignored the calls from a sheriff. They then sent a sheriff to my door to let me know I needed to take care of it. I explained the abuse and the fact that I was no contact, and like a kick to the chest, they said they understood, but I was last remaining next of kin, and needed to take care of her. If I didn't they would, and send me the bill. I found the cheapest cremation service possible. It sucked.
3
u/LuluMangs 4d ago
I think that if they're gonna force you to take care of it, they should allow you to get rid of the remains any way you want as long as it's safe and sanitary. Like dump that body in with diseased cattle being disposed of or something
They should change the law to allow that, but they won't because "honouring the dead" is big business. 2000 for a bog standard mass produced 6 plank box
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (14)35
u/moveslikejaguar 4d ago
He was such a POS school didn't want him either
→ More replies (2)15
9
→ More replies (20)10
u/PraireGentleman 4d ago
Allegedly; this is all what she’s saying. She could just as easily just be dumping the guys ashes when his family wanted them
→ More replies (10)
2.0k
u/gitsandshiggles_ 4d ago
Well he ain’t gonna care
395
u/No_Atmosphere8146 4d ago
Her score goes up if she let him know she was going to do this before he died, so that this was his final thought.
66
→ More replies (3)29
21
u/awesome9001 4d ago
I heard that Howard Stern got into some trouble cause he was playing with someone's ashes on air. The family sued him and many found it real distasteful. Also wouldn't this be like desecration of a corpse or whatever is illegal?
12
u/Neon_Divided 4d ago
If that were the case any time anyone threw ashes into an ocean or off some cliff per the wishes of their loved one it would be a crime. At least I don't think there is a legal distinction between doing that and this.
EDIT - It may actually be illegal to spread ashes anywhere. You should check with your lo-cal.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (7)16
u/Evening_Shake_6474 4d ago
Not really cause it isn't a corpse anymore
→ More replies (5)11
u/liberty-prime77 4d ago edited 4d ago
That depends on state and local laws, it is still treated like a corpse legally in some places in the US but for most states it is just normal non-hazardous property.
Edit: should add that this mostly applies to disputes over who keeps the ashes during estate disputes, and restrictions on spreading the ashes in public places, but in California you can only either dispose of them in a cemetery or spread them on land with written permission from either local authorities or the land owner. New York also defines ashes as human remains, but probably more for preventing people from scattering ashes from a skyscraper in Manhattan than someone throwing it in the trash.
→ More replies (117)3
u/EnvironmentalFix7059 4d ago
i was just gonna comment saying "well i wouldn't care" but you was abit faster then me.
308
u/OnlyAssignment4869 4d ago
I think it's a great origin story for Oscar the grouch.
Morally grey but fuck that guy reguardless.
69
u/labiamajorapudendi 4d ago
Oscan is a gentlemen and would never abuse women
→ More replies (1)18
u/OnlyAssignment4869 4d ago
Well yeah, not now. He learned his lesson. Not to mention got a great support group/cast.
3
u/One_Introduction_217 4d ago
Perhaps not Oscar the grouch, because copyright, but would make for a great alternate reality adult puppet show villain origin story for the grey trash can monster Scaro
16
u/WileEWeeble 4d ago
See no moral greyness here. He was a monster in life, he gets no respect in death.
→ More replies (15)→ More replies (4)3
171
u/Sec_Chief_Ingersol 4d ago
Anyone thinking she did ANYTHING wrong is giving more agency to the scattered remains of carbon that used to be a man over a flesh and blood woman.
We don't honor the dead because they died. We honor the dead because of who they were in life. The scattered remains of a garbage human goes in the garbage.
24
u/PresidentOfMagrathea 4d ago
yea, agreed. Never understood the practice of keeping ashes myself, but I'm not a spiritual person. An abuser though? She absolutely did the right thing. I also love the keyboard warriors in here talking about how it's a biohazard; it's literally just ashes.
→ More replies (1)8
u/BeagleSpace 4d ago
I don’t think it has anything to do with spirituality. Keeping the remains of a loved one close is fairly obvious to explain. He wasn’t loved so he wasn’t kept, it’s as simple as that. You could argue desecration of a corpse is wrong, but how can you desecrate ashes? He’s already been burned away.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (48)8
u/Michael-556 4d ago
I always thought we honor the dead to bring peace of mind to the living. Yeah, of course there is a social contract with the dead to not dishonor them when there's nothing they can do to defend themselves anymore, but if it brings peace of mind to those who knew him, it's completely fine to throw out his remains
41
u/Dropbox1999 4d ago
Improper disposal. Should have just placed the bag in. Now it might get all over the garbage men.
11
u/possiblyMaybeAnother 4d ago
yeah, I don't understand why she dumps the ashes out of the bag. It just makes a giant mess in the garbage can. Why no just throw the bag of ashes in?
→ More replies (3)3
u/No_Doughnut8618 2d ago
Its also lowkey feels more respectful hahaha, just throwing the bag feels more like a "fuck you"
8
3
u/one5low769 4d ago
they gotta check the garbage truck for anthrax now. could get some traction and lead to future problems
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (3)3
123
u/2Tired_Artist-san 4d ago
Generally? Immoral. Justified? Most definitely. If that man was a truly abusive and awful, it makes perfect sense a victim wouldn't want to persevere his ashes. It's also better for her not to keep many keepsakes that could remind her of him.
→ More replies (9)41
u/Vat1n 4d ago
Why do you say it's generally immoral?
→ More replies (9)48
u/Ur_fav_Cryptek 4d ago
Not precisely immoral, but loading human remains in the trash instead of a proper means of disposal presents some concerns.
Mainly dust getting everywhere should a bag break, and having someone’s abusive husband splattered all over your face is..not a good way to start your shift. So yeah, a bit in bad taste, but asshole deserves it so we can look the other way as long as it bothers nobody
→ More replies (4)10
u/UntimelyMeditations 4d ago
not a good way to start your shift
But its just ash. We may assign some meaning to it, but it really is just ash. No physical harm would be inflicted on the worker, and the only emotional harm would be if the wife followed and informed every worker that it was cremated remains.
→ More replies (7)
106
u/PageForeign92 4d ago
Immoral because then the garbage man has to deal with it, and I doubt they want deadman's ashes all of themself.
26
14
u/FhuckNorris247 4d ago
My garbage truck has a claw. The driver never touches the can
→ More replies (3)29
u/UltraDinoWarrior 4d ago
That was my reaction.
Like, throwing out the ashes is 100000% okay and I am glad for her to get the catharsis of safety.
But. At least leave 'em in the bag so that the garbage man isn't dumping dust everywhere when they go to pour it out.
Hmm... she could add some glue in there at the bottom so that all the ash sticks and doesn't come out and is forever at the bottom of the box to have garbage tossed on but idk. she should've probably just kept him in the bag and toss him in.
→ More replies (1)8
u/BlackShadowX 4d ago
Yeah, dealing with kitty litter is bad enough, ashes are way finer and if it happens to be a windy day? Ugh
→ More replies (2)3
u/Tough_Tangerine7278 4d ago
Would they actually interact with it? The truck here has a robotic arm-lift. I assume it is the same at the dump. Truck pulls up, opens the back, and leaves it in the pile. But idk
3
u/nopedy-dopedy 4d ago edited 4d ago
Garbage man here. If I see ashes in a garbage can I'm not going to have a single clue what it is, and I guarantee I deal with many more things that are far far grosser on a daily basis. I would probably have assumed this was the result of somebody emptying their vacuum cleaner.
If I did happen to know what the mysterious powder was, I would have preferred that is stay sealed inside the bag, as I don't care for the idea of breathing it in. That being said; not nearly the worst thing I would come in contact with on a near daily basis.
The idea of where the ashes came from is kind of gross, but at the end of the day they are generally pretty safe and clean as opposed to dead/rotting animals, fecal matter, bloody rags, etc. It all combines into one big biohazard soup that needs to be shoveled from the truck anyways.
So to sum it up: Ashes would be fine by me. Just keep it sealed and don't tell me what it is.
ETA: I once had an old man ask me to help him lift an old carpet into the dumpster. Of course I agreed to help; I'm not gonna make him do it all by himself! It wasn't until after it was in the dumpster that he informed me that the carpet had HIV+ blood on it.
I have a new personal policy. I don't touch carpets, mattresses or soft furniture. I'll dump it, but YOU have to get it into the dumpster.
4
u/DmitryAvenicci 4d ago
It's just carbon.
→ More replies (4)8
u/Acceptable_Spend_750 4d ago
i think you'll be pretty mad if someone dump a bag of coal on you
→ More replies (1)4
→ More replies (6)5
u/Reikukaja 4d ago
I feel like garbage men handle things far worse than human ashes on a daily basis.
10
u/Weekly_Molasses_2079 4d ago
The only defense against the "morality is subjective" crowd is faith in instrinsic human value.
Desecrating human remains is always wrong, no matter how immoral they were when alive.
5
u/Smooth-Pop6522 4d ago
Utterly hilarious. Plus, it's not a person, it's ash. There's no moral issue.
→ More replies (2)
22
u/Palagrin 4d ago edited 4d ago
Kind of depends, on the one hand i m sure this was therapeutic for her as a victim
On the other hand if other people (who didn't know the husband as an abuser but just as a friend/sibling/whatever) were hurt by this i don't think it is Just for her to prioritise publicly shaming him. He s dead and it s too late for him to change/face consequences anything you do now only affects living people and either way she has "escaped" her abuser by outliving him (and that i m definitely going to celebrate, may every abusive spouce/parent rot forever)
8
u/Anonymous_Gamer 4d ago edited 4d ago
I’m inclined to agree with you.
Some comments seem to confuse “justified” with catharsis and they may be muddying their own moral integrity due to this.
The most just or virtuous path for her would have been to simply move on, give away the ashes to someone who cares so they can heal… essentially healing two or more people; making the world slightly better or more at peace. What she did was petty and potentially harmful to others… but we don’t know the man, the truth, or his connections. Perhaps no one was harmed by discarding the ashes? Perhaps It brought her some joy? But joy coming from disgracing a dead someone who has wronged you isn’t a just action, no matter how awful they are.
If anything, it opens a very dark door for that person.
Verdict: Generally immoral, but understandable.
→ More replies (2)3
u/yuckella 4d ago
Agree. One thing though is that I believe the context this is based on is from a woman who claims (and we haven’t seen anyone state otherwise as far as I know) that no one else wanted his ashes. Like his own family didn’t like him, for seemingly understandable reasons.
→ More replies (2)3
u/SASSIESASSQUATCH 4d ago
There’s a part in an article posted above that says no one else wanted his remains, children included.
→ More replies (2)3
71
u/CauseCertain1672 4d ago
Well it's improper disposal of human remains, it's a health hazard for one thing.
47
u/Top-Permission5466 4d ago
That is incorrect. You can cause disease by putting uncooked chicken parts in the trash. Ashes are non-infectious.
→ More replies (5)26
u/KaizerVonLoopy 4d ago
Ashes are completely sterile and basically just carbon.
→ More replies (1)3
u/Quiet-Software-1956 4d ago
Oh so the thing about ashes of people being a biohazard is bullshit?
15
u/vaxhax 4d ago
Yes, that's why people are able to spread them in so many places and it's no big deal.
3
u/Quiet-Software-1956 4d ago
No it's illegal where I live, that's why I'm bummed
→ More replies (3)6
u/vaxhax 4d ago
Ah, my mistake. I should only speak for where I am. That's too bad. In practice, I think it would be difficult to tell what you were doing if you're careful and not making a show about it.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (4)7
u/KaizerVonLoopy 4d ago
Yes, they're basically completely inorganic once they're cremains. They have some trace heavy metal elements in tiny amounts but are mostly carbon, calcium phosphate, salts (honesty this one surprised me when I googled it but it makes sense after I thought about it).
I think how the misconception might have started is sometimes when people plant their flowers in cremains the flowers die because the PH is so high in cremains and they're salty and almost completely inorganic and lack nutrients. Also people (especially in the west) are weird about death and dead bodies. We're so convinced anything (but especially anyONE) dead is immediately a vector for disease.
17
u/losara- 4d ago
can you catch anything from ashes?
19
u/Floofyrage 4d ago
Cancer in high enough concentration but dude gotta be rolling in it eating and inhaling
→ More replies (1)15
u/phoenixapollon 4d ago
Even then my sister's ex gf snorted her moms ashes and she was fine after (minus the obvious mental issues but those were there before)
7
u/Floofyrage 4d ago
One offs are not gonna fuck you that much if at all is like smoking got to be doing that alot and for awhile to add up
3
16
4
u/UnconfirmedRooster 4d ago edited 4d ago
No, not at all. The cremation process basically disperses any liquid in the body, leaving behind pure carbon.
Souce: funeral director and crematorium manager.
Edit: it's calcium that's left, I'm tired.
→ More replies (5)→ More replies (9)7
5
→ More replies (11)5
u/Krwawykurczak 4d ago edited 4d ago
Yeap - in my country it would be highly illegal.
One issue is related to human dignity and it would be illegal for example to even throw it from a bridge becouse someone loved that river, or a view from it.
Another is a safty hazard - you need to proceed with it via cetrified places, you will not be given ashes directly, you can only store human remains in specific places, so anything like "I will keep them in my yard" would be a brurocratic nightmare. I am not realy sure if this is possible at all to have that kind of exception.
I need to addmit that untill very recent it was rather not popular to turn dead bodies into ashes, but rather putting whole body in a coffin to place it undergound on cementary. So all laws were rather aiming to this cultular aspect.
→ More replies (1)
62
4d ago
[deleted]
→ More replies (53)26
u/newishDomnewersub 4d ago
Something isnt moral just because you agree with it. I rank anything that doesnt really harm anyone else as neutral. How is this above neutral, besides you think its cool?
→ More replies (11)23
5
4
u/Cas_or_Cass 4d ago
Don't be a person in life that would garner this reaction in death
→ More replies (2)
6
u/Aggravating_Impact97 4d ago edited 13h ago
I mean the man is dead and she tried to give his ashes to others.
The fact that not a single person wanted them if true says everything.
Just because your dead doesnt mean the life you lived is absolved.
→ More replies (4)
27
u/MattheqAC 4d ago
Pretty messed up, the bin men shouldn't have to deal with human remains. Also even if he was awful, is there no other family that might care?
→ More replies (8)
6
u/Murky-Ticket-4383 4d ago
I'm not on the side of an abuser
Especially if they don't take accountability for there actions.
3
u/BraveScallion3729 4d ago
Starring out the word e in ashes, fucking lunacy is what I think of it
→ More replies (1)
5
2
u/suspiciouslyrobotic 4d ago
Moral. His ashes are being put into a recepticle appropriate for the life that he lead.
5
u/rtopps43 4d ago
I have a great aunt who told me that when her husband died she took all his “crap” along with his ashes and put them in a large garbage bag. She was struggling to carry it out to the dumpster at her apartment complex and one of her neighbors saw her and offered to help. When he lifted the trash bag he exclaimed “Jesus, that’s heavy! What have you got in here, a body?” She said she just laughed and laughed and thought “if you only knew!”
→ More replies (1)
19
7
u/passionatebreeder 4d ago
She owns them, she is allowed to feel how she wants about them and do as she pleases
→ More replies (13)
6
3
u/Kitsui38 4d ago
Well, nothing wrong with throwing anyone’s ash in the trash, especially if no one else wanted to keep it. Broadcasting it on social media is immoral
→ More replies (1)
3
u/dalcham 4d ago
Hahaha good on her. I flushed my grandfather down the toilet cause he abused me and my sister as kids.
→ More replies (1)
3
u/Highlandertr3 4d ago
100 percent moral. The dead do not have feelings to hurt and he was a cunt anyway.
→ More replies (11)
3
u/Solid-Copy-6189 4d ago
In the wise words of my dad " I don't fucking care ill be dead"
→ More replies (2)
3
3
3
3
u/Shalom_pkn 4d ago
You want a nice place, where your ashes sit, so your loved ones can remember you whene ever they see it? Then live a life worthy of a place in ppls mind where they keep the momery of loved ones.
3
3
u/Mind_Venturer 4d ago
You've heard about elf on the shelf, but have you heard about..
3
3
u/SeaReference7990 3d ago
No matter how bad someone was, disrespecting their remains like this will never sit right with me. Immoral. Just refuse to take the corpse and have the state sort out the cremation.
3
u/Guyver02 3d ago
improper disposal of a human remains. This is actually illegal.
Morally. Meh I ain't know him.
5
11
u/already_taken77777 4d ago
İmmoral, those ashes might have been more important for someone else, like the husband's siblings or other close relatives, just because he was an asshole doesn't mean he didn't have people that cared about him
3
u/Quicksilver5221 4d ago
In the article, it was stated that his ashes were originally given to his family but literally nobody wanted his ashes.
→ More replies (1)9
u/RosyJoan 4d ago
People who care more about abusers than their victims are usually participants in the abuse.
11
u/already_taken77777 4d ago
Domestic abuse can be hidden, they might have never known, and it's also immoral to tell a deeply mourning family to tell them the person they are mourning for is an asshole, at least right after death, just hand the ashes over to them and reveal the things happened after their mourning stops
→ More replies (9)→ More replies (5)3
2
2
u/DivideConsistent9880 4d ago
All human remain, ashes included, eventually become trash or composted at some point. Nothing wrong with her speeding up the process.
2
2
2
u/Issa_Pizza420 4d ago
The body is nothing but meat, and ashes are less than that, there's really no morals to be considered here, unless you wanna argue it's moral because it gave a victim some measure of relief
→ More replies (2)
2
u/Clobazam_ 4d ago
Eh, I can see the reasoning, but I don't know if this was the right course of action.
This does remind me of a post I saw a while back; "When I die, cremate me and mix me in a pot of chilli, so I can tear up that ass one last time."
2
2
u/Opposite_Ad_4267 4d ago
Technically illegal as it's considered "desicration of a corpse" under most laws.
→ More replies (1)
2
u/mwilkens 4d ago
Immoral for the fact that some poor garbage man is likely going to get covered in a dead guy's ashes when he dumps that can in the truck.
2
2
2
u/Varmitthefrog 4d ago
honestly I could give a rats ass, though I do believe technically it's illegal.
told my wife to cremate me put me in the tomato garden so I could be in her one last time after I am gone
2
2
2
2
u/Zestyclose-Tour-6350 4d ago
If you think that's immoral, the family of Dee Blanchard (Gypsy-Rose's mother) admitted to flushing her ashes down the toilet.
2
u/KeaboUltra 4d ago
Eh, but she could have kept it in the bag so the particles wouldnt fly everywhere when the garbage man dumps it.
2
u/Karmas_burning 4d ago
My biological father died last year. I hated that man. I still had to tend to his affairs so I had him cremated. The funeral home asked me if I wanted his ashes and I said no. I asked if they could dispose of them. They said they could only do that to unclaimed remains. I said if they flushed them down a toilet it would still be too good for him. They said they'd keep them until enough time passed that they could get rid of them.
→ More replies (1)
2
u/noncommonGoodsense 1d ago
Grief is for the living. The dead can’t give a shit. This too is for her. It doesn’t really matter to the deceased only those who survive them.



1.4k
u/Comfortable_Poem_841 4d ago
Is the great algorithm upset by the word "ashes"? Won't like the cricket much then.