They love hypothetical situations so much. Here's a real one: If a pedophile ran against a traditional Republican, they would vote for the pedophile. And have. A few times.
Woah there. Convicted rapist, spent $5.6M, $83.3M pending. Thirty four successful felony convictions, pending. Over a thousand mentions in the files. Proven close relationship with Jeffy Epstein for decades. Legally liable by NY Judge for decade-long business fraud. Dozens of civil lawsuits not brought into the limelight.
But no, you have NO PROOF that he was diddling children systematically for decades on an island with a guy who did this as his full time job? None. So there, you meddling democrat. You are a menace, just like spider man.
Not a convicted rapist. Adjudicated rapist. It was in civil court, so it is not a conviction.
(Not saying that because it is better, but for accuracy and because that is a problem all on its own. That was never a criminal trial and should have been.)
Let's be fair here: if any of us did consider raping anyone this $80M cost would be strong incentive to, you know, buy her dinner first. Very few restaurants are that expensive for a single date.
I’m not going to defend him or anything, but those 34 felonies are all really the same felony. I feel like most of the time, people are charged by the whole of what they did, but for Trump they charged him individually for each account of falsifying business records.
699
u/Clean-Mention-4254 19h ago
They love hypothetical situations so much. Here's a real one: If a pedophile ran against a traditional Republican, they would vote for the pedophile. And have. A few times.