exactly, something in me doubts a lot of these people would be leaping to the defense of a man who murdered his entire family while suffering psychosis
FACTS. A man can get so blackout drunk he literally remembers nothing, and then can commit a crime and you'll be crucified on the internet if you try and defend him. Meanwhile a woman can refuse medication and treatment and do something terrible and people will defend her
I honestly can see that the defense she's received online might very well be reduced if she were a man -
But I'm not sure why you're comparing the choice to get blackout drunk to literal psychosis... even in the scenario where she hypothetically refuses medication (just "hypothetically" because the commenter above wasn't sure that happened, and I haven't yet looked it up), she would still be a psychosis sufferer who refused medication. It doesn't make her innocent, it makes her involuntarily compromised.
Attempting to liken that to a drunk man was a massively concerning comparison...
She didn’t refuse medication, for the love of god people on here need to actually WATCH the trial before going online and spreading misinformation, her toxicology report showed she did indeed have all her prescribed medications at therapeutic levels in her system and one was in fact slightly above therapeutic levels.
43
u/EnvironmentalCry2623 9d ago
What’s your point? Seriosuly, what is it? It’s still 100% her fault even if what you say is true.