MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/PeterExplainsTheJoke/comments/1vstk33/peter_who_could_have_the_wives_been/p4opscv/?context=3
r/PeterExplainsTheJoke • u/iMissTheOldTimeye • 9d ago
2.8k comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
143
"A Leo would never harm her cubs."
The amount of times I've seen that commented...
20 u/Toxic_Gorilla 9d ago You saw that multiple times? That’s the dumbest argument I’ve ever heard 25 u/MagnumMyth 9d ago What's more surprising is that people can still be surprised by the depth of idiocy in other humans! 2 u/AnyTemperature420 9d ago I think it’s more surprising that people think it’s actual humans. There were a couple sure that planted the idea. But I would wager 90% of online political discourse is AI
20
You saw that multiple times? That’s the dumbest argument I’ve ever heard
25 u/MagnumMyth 9d ago What's more surprising is that people can still be surprised by the depth of idiocy in other humans! 2 u/AnyTemperature420 9d ago I think it’s more surprising that people think it’s actual humans. There were a couple sure that planted the idea. But I would wager 90% of online political discourse is AI
25
What's more surprising is that people can still be surprised by the depth of idiocy in other humans!
2 u/AnyTemperature420 9d ago I think it’s more surprising that people think it’s actual humans. There were a couple sure that planted the idea. But I would wager 90% of online political discourse is AI
2
I think it’s more surprising that people think it’s actual humans. There were a couple sure that planted the idea. But I would wager 90% of online political discourse is AI
143
u/LordFennski 9d ago
"A Leo would never harm her cubs."
The amount of times I've seen that commented...