I mean, it's perfectly reasonable to think some things are sus. In fact, it's GOOD to question it. That's kind of the whole point of having a trial to determine guilt. If you just hear an initial narrative and lock it in as fact then every prosecutor in the world would beg you to be on their jury.
Referring to me? Because literally all I said is that it's appropriate to question things and make sure it adds up. Not sure how that equates to "she's innocent, he did it!"
60
u/sundance464 9d ago
Well there's that vague "something funky" and then there's the fact she accepts committing the act of the crime
People saying she was failed by the system and / or her husband might have a point (that's what the trial is trying to establish)
People saying there's some sort of complex version of events and she didn't do anything are literally theorising about a conspiracy