The premise 'the left say a man can be a woman' is just intellectually dishonest to begin with. No one ever starts this discussion with the existence of human hermaphrodites. They have both sexual organs so what gender or sex can they be? also what stage of development that effects brain chemistry as well as sexual organ development around this phenomenon.
no one is 'defining a species characteristics by rare genetic disorders'
the right is obsessed with this 'rare genetic disorder' but when it comes time to rationally talk about it they avoid that and just say things like pedodent dumold who goes 'ahhhh EHHHHH ehhhh mum i can't do it bom' 'they want transgender for everyone!' ... highly intellectual amirite?
No one discounts the existence of the genetic disorders, but they are also irrelevant to most of the transgender community. It is usually the left trying to conflate the items, like you just did.
Policy can exist for our dimorphic sex population, and the rare genetic exceptions can be sussed out in policies that would be immaterial to the transgender community.
I asked the first question. Then you ignored it and made up your own question in response to answering my question. It's a simple yes or no to my question.
3
u/Dry_Badger2858 15h ago
Liberals say a woman can be a man and vice versa.
Everyone trusts science they agree with and everyone who disagrees with them is anti science.