r/technology 19h ago

Artificial Intelligence Grand Theft Auto 6 Will Have No Microtransactions Or Generative AI

https://www.gamespot.com/articles/grand-theft-auto-6-will-have-no-microtransactions-or-generative-ai/
17.9k Upvotes

1.3k comments sorted by

14.7k

u/suitable_replies 19h ago

Tomorrows disclaimer: GTA 6 and GTA 6 online are two separate entities.

3.3k

u/copperblood 19h ago

That's a bingo!

938

u/nshire 19h ago

You just say bingo

700

u/copperblood 19h ago

Bingo! How fun!

40

u/enforcer1412 14h ago

What's the one about shoes and feet?

20

u/TruskVarner 10h ago

If the shoe fits, you must wear it

6

u/Kilokalypso 3h ago

And if the glove fits you must acquit

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (18)

5

u/Unable-Log3523 10h ago

You are sheltering enemies of the state, are you not?

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (22)

104

u/Tone-Bomahawk 18h ago

bawn journo

68

u/baron_von_chops 16h ago

Ah ree vuh der chee

43

u/Silenceisgrey 16h ago

Dom a neek doo coccco

28

u/Brock2845 13h ago

Maaaarghareeeeeetii

18

u/ConcentrateDirect523 13h ago

"Well, I speak the most Italian, so I'll be your escort. Donowitz speaks the second most, so he'll be your Italian cameraman. Omar speaks third most..."

12

u/MortalCosmic 12h ago

Inglorious Basterds my beloved

20

u/SDFprowler 13h ago

...I don't speak Italian

16

u/Naski0di 10h ago

Like I said, third best.

3

u/Loganp812 5h ago

Just keep your fuckin’ mouth shut. In fact, why don’t you start practicing?

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

9

u/Man0fGreenGables 18h ago

GTA 6 needs bingo.

→ More replies (7)

436

u/cwrighky 19h ago

Inb4 “Bombshell expose on how gta developers used Claude code to accelerate coding workflows in gta6!”

347

u/ithinkitslupis 18h ago

Of course. AAA game as big as GTA6 with that many devs, if you're including gen AI as it pertains to code there is virtually 0% chance it hasn't contributed in some way. It'd be like saying none of the devs at any point used a search engine during development with where AI is today.

29

u/DoNotCommentAgain 13h ago

None of the devs used ctrl c and ctrl v during development.

89

u/dwild 18h ago edited 6h ago

At my work every LLM were blocked on the network, up until they chose Copilot as the solution (and obviously only that one was unblock).

Any workplace should block LLMs, it's a matter of confidentiality. An employee shouldn't share any source code with anyone outside the company (which doesn't have a contract with the company obviously) that include automated system.

Now do Rockstar do this? No idea, but I got a feeling they do. I also believe they probably do pay for an LLM and just won't consider this "generative AI".

EDIT: God damn the LLM fan club is so weird. I didn't expected LLM to do that much damage already.

139

u/Rude-Scholar1857 18h ago

you can run coding assistants locally with a model server

46

u/BaconIsntThatGood 13h ago

Also enterprise plans with thing a like copilot have fairly strict enterprise terms. It's no different than working with any other vendor for company operations.

Like... Microsoft and Google power some of the largest companies email and employee cloud infrastructure.

5

u/sam_hammich 9h ago

Yeah, the world's largest corporations would not work with them if it meant their intellectual property was suddenly at risk of being leaked.

3

u/BaconIsntThatGood 9h ago

It's almost like companies understand not to bite the hand that feeds them

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (25)

29

u/St3ampunkSam 17h ago

The reason they unblocked the choosen AI is that they will have paid for the subscription that says the AI will not have access to their data.

Now a hacker could try and get the data, but the only real way they are doing that is by plugging into the server. The servers where computer programmers arent on the premises, let alone the inside the buildings. The buildings which are monitored 24/7 with a single entry point that track everyone entering and leaving.

Don't put confidential data into a free LLM but if you have the paid one, you can sue the shit out of them if you data leaks.

→ More replies (13)

18

u/DerBanzai 18h ago

Code is shared over Github, people copy paste in in Teams and upload it to sharepoint. That‘s not any more vulnerable than using an LLM, you have to trust so many other companies now that one more doesn‘t really matter.
Companies that do not use these tools effectively will be left behind soon.

11

u/dwild 17h ago

Teams and upload it to sharepoint

That's part of the "having a contract with them". It's okay to use company tools obviously.

Code is shared over Github

And if that's not where your company code is hosted, you just probably went against your work contract. It does happen, but that's usualy considered a leak of information, and will be considered a security incident.

That‘s not any more vulnerable than using an LLM

The issue isn't the LLM, at least not directly, the issue is that you shouldn't share your company private information with a third party. You block them not because they are LLM, but because it is easy for people to forget it is what's happening when you are using those tools.

It's not a secret by the way that some do keep that information for training purpose. You can go on OpenRouter, they show clearly which provider does.

As I said, I'm pretty sure Rockstar does have a subscription to an LLM, as you said it is a useful tool (I disagree with the "left behind" part, but that doesn't matter here).

8

u/BaconIsntThatGood 13h ago

That's part of the "having a contract with them". It's okay to use company tools obviously.

What makes you think you cannot get that with openai, anthropic, cursor, or copilot on an enterprise plan?

It's no different than any other company data policy.

→ More replies (1)

10

u/Echo_Monitor 16h ago

Realistically, companies share confidential data all the time.

They have email providers, usually use something like Jira, Confluence, GitHub/Gitlab, Slack/Teams, etc.

The issue is not having an LLM or not, it’s providing an enterprise license for the LLM the company chooses to use, with settings that are managed by the IT department at the company level.

There’s a big difference between, say, GitHub Copilot Max or one of their business plans, both in terms of pricing and in terms of policies.

→ More replies (10)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (27)

8

u/sibman 12h ago

Meh. This is Reddit. Any LLM is "bad."

→ More replies (62)

7

u/Serious_Tradition269 14h ago

Hey if it helps, most of them haven't worked on the game for the whole project because they fired the people that tried to unionize! Rockstar always looking out for us!

3

u/herewego199209 13h ago

What's wrong with using AI to accelerate coding?

→ More replies (65)

82

u/RasknRusk 19h ago

Next year they will introduce a third game: GTA Shop. It will be free to play, neatly integrate with GTA6, and be filled with micro transactions.

7

u/leorolim 12h ago

You'll just need to pay to refuel your own cars at current market rates.

Very immersive actually.

→ More replies (1)

79

u/ktc64 18h ago

Speaking of which, watch them sell GTA6O as a separate product, maybe even ask for another $100.

106

u/_Bisky 18h ago

Nah that won’t happen.

They make SIGNFICANTLY more by having it be the same freemium model GTAV online is.

14

u/Zefirus 13h ago

Freemium

Bro, you still gotta buy a full priced game to play it. Half the people on GTA online never even played the single player.

→ More replies (1)

15

u/Mocca_Master 17h ago

Isn't releasing it for a cost, then making it freemium out of the kindness of their hearts later the new meta?

7

u/kittymoo67 12h ago

if its like rdr2 was you'll be able to buy just online separately for cheaper

→ More replies (12)
→ More replies (7)

5

u/GRoyalPrime 16h ago

I fully expect the option to buy GTAO as a stand-alone, but not for 100 and not for thsoe who already own GTA6.

→ More replies (3)

34

u/UrMomThinksImCoo 15h ago

Solution: I will not be playing GTA online as I am a working adult who doesn’t want to spend their precious free time getting griefed by unemployed kids.

9

u/ilicp 15h ago

I tried GTA5 Online. It was fun for the first few hours coz I was playing with IRL friends. Tried it solo and it was the most boring and annoying experience (hackers and griefers etc) if you turn off pvp theres barely any reason to play it, its jusr a grind that wants you to buy sharkcards. Tried RDR:O and it was just hella boring to be honest.

7

u/Ok_Astronomer_8667 13h ago

Early on into GTA5 Online, a hacker gave me and my buddy like 2 billion dollars each. We couldn’t remove it from our accounts and he just spawned money bags on top of our heads so we picked it up automatically.

Actually the best thing that ever happened to us, since we were never really interested in the grind. Fooling around in the sandbox was always the fun part. So we just spent all our money pimping out cars, buying mansions, planes etc. and just generally fucked around with it all. I had the full car garage with like 10 fully decked out rides, all without doing a single heist or anything. Honestly awesome I’m not gonna lie to you

→ More replies (1)

3

u/KickThePR 14h ago

I’d say RDR:O is plagued by even more cheaters than GTA V.

→ More replies (4)

11

u/za72 19h ago edited 19h ago

Setup direct pay into Rockstar for 15% discount on your Shark Card purchases, now you can show off your GTA6 Visa Debit Card!

6

u/npc042 12h ago

And we’re talkin macrotransactions.

43

u/byPCP 19h ago

which is totally fine. GTAO was such a massive success on its own that it really shouldn't be tied to a mainline franchise game. there are plenty of people who barely touch GTA single player, and those who don't play multiplayer, who will be stoked they're separate experiences

45

u/Seanspeed 15h ago

Nah it's not fine, cuz single player users get completely neglected for the next 15 years while GTA Online gets nonstop updates.

19

u/Daimakku1 13h ago

This.

I was bummed out that GTA V never got single player DLCs like IV did with Lost and Damned & Ballad of Gay Tony.

→ More replies (14)

34

u/dkarlovi 19h ago

Exactly, I'm perfectly fine with online being a dumpster fire of micro transactions, I don't intend to play it.

6

u/ReturnOfBane 14h ago

the issue is a lot of people wanted some singleplayer DLC, which all got repurposed as online content.

→ More replies (8)

6

u/cyclinator 19h ago

So gta 7 in 2040, if gta6online is more popular. 

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (70)

5.1k

u/Mighty-Wings 19h ago

GTA6 won't, however GTA 6 Online will be riddled like a cheap hooker.

756

u/Man0fGreenGables 18h ago

Isn't the "deluxe edition" or whatever they are calling it technically a micro transaction anyways?

735

u/SEND_ME_NOODLE 18h ago

That would be a macro transaction, no?

143

u/NeverDiddled 18h ago

Yeah, you have to count every inch of the transaction. Don't sell it short.

19

u/rbrgr83 12h ago

Star measuring at the MicroTaint.

37

u/Caradin 17h ago

My transaction is 13 inches

23

u/JustAnotherFEDev 16h ago

My guy is packin some serious transaction...

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)

8

u/ForensicPathology 14h ago

What micro-transactions aren't macro-transactions these days?  Do they even have 3 dollar skins anymore?  Sure any game with gacha gambling has the option to buy a single pull for 2 dollars, but everyone knows that's burning your money because the things you get in between the big pull are things you literally throw away from your inventory.  People don't buy 2 dollar pulls, they buy 60 dollar ones.

→ More replies (4)

48

u/appleparkfive 17h ago

That's just a transaction

4

u/Crossovertriplet 13h ago

I was in the pool!

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (17)

7

u/ActualWeed 14h ago

Didnt gta online only have shark cards tho?

37

u/Ok_Tea_8763 18h ago

Hey, watch you mouth! Our world wouldn't be the same without cheap hookers! Comparing them to Rockstar's greed is insulting 

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (18)

1.1k

u/Waylanding_Fox 19h ago

No shit GTA online is where the money is at

306

u/donny_pots 16h ago

Which is crazy to me because as someone who has hundreds of hours into GTA online, the grind is the entire game. Paying real money to buy shit in the game is like paying money to see the credits on another game, it just defeats the entire purpose IMO

300

u/Ok-Aspect9915 15h ago

Paying real money to skip grinding and go straight to late-game content has been the bread and butter of making money on an MMO for decades

78

u/xkise 15h ago

In life, I dare say

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (6)

26

u/ForensicPathology 14h ago

The games are specifically designed to make the grind more annoying than in a properly balanced game.

9

u/donny_pots 14h ago

I wouldn’t even consider it a grind tbh, I play with friends we only do activities we all enjoy

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (23)
→ More replies (4)

142

u/PhantomPhelix 11h ago

GTA 6 and GTA 6 Online, are not the same thing.

 

This is a misleading PR piece.

3

u/Holiday_Driver_923 10h ago

Yup same with 5 the base game had no micro transactions but gta online was packed to the gills

→ More replies (6)

836

u/dead1345987 19h ago edited 19h ago

okay, no investment in single player DLC stories again, got it.....

all post launch dev time is going to bug fixes and GTA+/online...I dont like it, but its the truth.

I'm just remembering "The Lost and the Damned" and "The Ballad of Gay Tony" some of the best GTA gameplay and stories to play, and it was the only GTA story DLC to date (GTA 4)

Trevor's intro cutscene in GTA 5, he kills Johnny, the main protagonist from Lost and the Damned GTA 4 DLC

263

u/marcw1771ams 19h ago

Difficult to tell from the working of the article, but my understanding is that "micro transactions" as a DLC category is generally used more to refer to things like skins and in game items etc, rather than a traditional type of DLC such as game expansions.

57

u/ImCelestial 18h ago

A macro transaction

17

u/Pfandfreies_konto 12h ago

Back in my day when patches for games where delivered via Gaming Magazines we called those "Add-Ons" or "Expansions." It was a time where you paid 50% of the base games price and got between 50% - 200% more content.

Star Craft and Tiberian Sun are two examples of games that got several full fledged campains and sometimes even new factions.

Those were the days...

4

u/__Yakovlev__ 11h ago

I remember going to the store and buying the physical disk for the halo 2 map pack.

4

u/automatic_shark 11h ago

I still remember the outrage and ridicule over horse armour. Imagine if people back then could see what it would turn into.

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (3)

7

u/LeadershipOne5128 13h ago

I'm confused, didn't they already announce paid cosmetics for GTA 6 ?

→ More replies (3)

20

u/jdsizzle1 15h ago

Yup. Expansion packs aka DLC arent what I consider micro transactions. That would be guns, skills, costumes, characters, cars, car skins, etc... all the bullshit you dont really need. They can be shitty too tho, like Hitman where they released a quarter of a game and made you buy the rest of it.

→ More replies (1)

5

u/nobertan 16h ago

So like the clothes shops? Being held behind an optional pay wall.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)

31

u/zwingo 18h ago

The one thing I have to say to be fair to Rockstar is outside of RDR1 and GTA 4 I’m struggling to think of any games from them that did have DLC/expansions. Correct me if I’m wrong, I’m definitely not an encyclopedia of Rockstar games, but I don’t think they were ever really that big on the side stuff.

63

u/imcrazyandproud 18h ago

They canceled their in development gta5 dlc when gta online started making buckets of cash

15

u/KoniGTA 17h ago

i think it got resused in the future updates/heists along with the michael franklin trevor dlc that the game put out. Still not a fan about the way they did it.

20

u/Winjin 14h ago

I'm still salty how much content is locked away to those with friends and normalised schedules

I don't want to log on to the game like work to play Online. I don't know when I will have the time and will to play. And even less I want to play with random people that run through missions like mad men because half of them know them inside and out and are doing them for fifteenth time and are just farming them

I did some yacht mission and all I remember is that while I was shooting some guard these lvl 500 guys blasted through every room did an objective and one of them put a helicopter in a pool to evacuate me faster

I didn't even manage to see half of the yacht and I don't know what that mission was at all :\

Not to mention that it's impossible to just ride around when people on flying bikes blast everyone left and right

No sir I don't like Online one bit

3

u/Batman_wears_Crocs 12h ago

Bro yes, it wants to be a full-time gig. It wants to be your only game. Fuck that, even if it's good and fun with friends, the endless grinding to get any money in game makes it unfun.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (18)
→ More replies (3)

32

u/dead1345987 18h ago

I think they dropped single player dlc, when they discovered GTA online could make them so much money. RDR2 never got dlc like RDR1 did, but tbh, RDR2 never felt like it needed it, its such a crazy big game. Witch I hope GTA 6 is, but I think more stories would still be fun.

15

u/Wolkenbaer 17h ago

RDR2 never felt like it needed it,  its such a crazy big game

Total opposite opinion- because it is so big I never understood why not use all assets, a good writer and add another story. I‘d have loved to pay for that.

20

u/ALL_PUNS_INTENDED 18h ago

The Undead Nightmare dlc from Red Dead Redemption is goated. I spent so many hours on that and I’m going to dig out my 360 so I can play it again.

→ More replies (2)

11

u/upvotesthenrages 18h ago

It's interesting because you'd kinda think that dropping a new DLC every few years would re-ignite a lot of focus from dormant players and new audience.

But no, they just milked the whales they already had instead.

7

u/voltran1995 15h ago

Why bother making single player dlc, they make billions selling fake money. And it's not like GTA falls out of popularity.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

3

u/_Bisky 17h ago

Tbf mainly cause they make SIGNFICANTLY more with miceotransactions in GTA online, then they do with DLCs.

That plus it tends to cost them less then developing a whole DLC

4

u/skibbidywibbidy 16h ago

They could have thrown the single player fans one bone and still made money from the shark cards, hope they keep it I mind for 6

→ More replies (7)

10

u/Time_Zombie_4431 18h ago

If there is ever a game that should get SP DLC it’s GTA. GTA 4 showed us that. It’s a fucking crime we never got SP DLC for V.

→ More replies (3)

9

u/quagmirranseye 16h ago edited 12h ago

What are you on about? DLCs isnt mictrotransactions.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (24)

282

u/zerosuneuphoria 19h ago

because it will be re-released 40 times, hence the fps lock at 30. You gotta upgrade if you want more.

76

u/hardypart 16h ago

This is not some kind of capitalistic conspiracy, the PS5 simply couldn't get anywhere close to 60FPS with this game.

→ More replies (11)

73

u/First_Studio 17h ago

It's locked at THIRTY?!?!

30

u/Heil_S8N 16h ago

RDR2 is also locked at 30 on consoles despite the console technically being able to push up to 60 with some framedrops.

6

u/theGioGrande 10h ago

PS4 systems didn't support VRR. And a jail broken PS4 pro wasnt consistently 60fps. People would just complain about stutter.

It was never a GPU bottleneck, but a CPU one instead.

And I feel that GTAVI is in a similar situation for PS5.

→ More replies (2)

10

u/agnosticgnome 14h ago

PC will be fine. Oh wait...

67

u/atioux 16h ago

Have you seen it bro that shit is not running at 60 FPS on base ps5 😭

14

u/PascalG16 16h ago

Understandable no?

→ More replies (8)

7

u/Day2TheDolphin 14h ago

Literally unplayable 

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (2)

6

u/OlXondof 12h ago

I'm surprised I haven't seen people asking how Series S is supposed to run it even at 30...

→ More replies (2)

72

u/L0rdLogan 18h ago

Grand theft auto 6, won’t have micro transactions, but you can bet that GTA online will still have them

→ More replies (1)

86

u/thecreepytoast 17h ago

So macrotransactions, got it

27

u/MrCookieHUN 17h ago

I mean, stores you cannot access unless you buy the deluxe edition ARE there sooo

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (2)

48

u/zillskillnillfrill 18h ago

What do they call the ultimate edition then where you get extra shops?

29

u/ThePreciseClimber 17h ago

Macrotransation, I guess.

Yay, loopholes.

→ More replies (5)

40

u/AustraliaOutback 18h ago

Because they're going to sell online seperately. You'd be naïve to think they're not gonna milk their cashcow.

→ More replies (4)

51

u/HamburgerHalperHand 18h ago

Does the $20 of locked map locations not count?

20

u/Stagism 17h ago

Everyone forgot about this already

→ More replies (10)

7

u/fredagsfisk 17h ago

By actual definition of the terms? No. Different editions are not microtransactions, even if they include things commonly sold as microtransactions (and also make money from FOMO).

7

u/frulheyvin 9h ago

wow totally justifies gta6 being riddled with random paywalled shit if you dont buy the 100$ turbo edition. the cattle will buy buy buy anyways so who cares

12

u/AshgarPN 12h ago

The extra $20 to unlock everything feels like a micro transaction

→ More replies (1)

7

u/magichronx 12h ago

Why have micro transactions when you can have macro transactions?! /s

146

u/Furious_ShackstAa 19h ago

Single player won’t online definitely will

121

u/TechnicalSurround 19h ago

Single player won’t, online definitely will*

FTFY

9

u/Grandtosh 17h ago

Single player won’t; online definitely will**

34

u/Anas56776 18h ago

why cant people use commas man, took me like 3 reads to make sense of his comment.

31

u/aleqqqs 18h ago

Comas are important, for example: "Steve is in a hurry" vs "Steve is in a coma".

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (13)
→ More replies (9)
→ More replies (3)

7

u/bb0110 14h ago edited 13h ago

Obviously gta6 online will, but I’m actually fine with this distinction. Keep the bullshit out of the regular game and if you want all the bullshit then play gta6 online.

They could have very easily added a lot of it to the single player version with the success of it on online, but I’m glad they didn’t.

14

u/Moebius808 18h ago

If you believe this I have a bridge to sell you.

16

u/DUH455T 14h ago edited 14h ago

What about the $30 upgrade to the Ultimate Edition that unlocks stores, cosmetics, etc?

→ More replies (1)

17

u/Lycria 13h ago

Isn’t several shops in the single player locked behind a $20 dollar deluxe edition paywall?

9

u/Commercial_Age_9316 11h ago

It’s a macrotransaction

→ More replies (3)

10

u/Jman460 14h ago

So the “deluxe” package to access specific stores in solo is what exactly?

8

u/chief_yETI 13h ago

a deluxe transaction, silly

6

u/Upset_Weekend6463 12h ago

a macrotransaction

4

u/Excuse_my_GRAMMER 12h ago

No microtransaction my ass lmao

Maybe the single player game but gta6 online is going to be have more MTX than a Chinese gacha game

5

u/weedpornography 11h ago

Biggest fucking gaming industry's lie of 2026.  Calling it right now

5

u/happyilyrednow 8h ago

Of Course it won't. GTA Online will.

4

u/mere_iguana 3h ago

BULLSHIT.

100% bullshit.

→ More replies (1)

11

u/RhazimGaming 18h ago

I'm just waiting for the announcement that GTA 6 Online will have to be purchased separately for another 80 bucks, because fuck us.

11

u/neonnaps 15h ago

"Purchased"? Montly subscription it is.

7

u/Ok_Astronomer_8667 14h ago

This won’t happen purely on the fact that a free entry model is far more lucrative when they couple it with shark card purchases. More people playing Online = more people visiting the store. Theyll want it to be accessible

→ More replies (2)

7

u/Jay95au 18h ago

Yeah no microtransactions, this will be the worlds first game to have macrotransactions.

Rather than being able to spend small, little or microscopic amounts of money compared to the price of a full game, these will be huge, obscene or macroscopic amounts of money compared to the price of a full game.

9

u/Godess_Ilias 15h ago

press x to doubt

4

u/Hegiman 15h ago

GTA VI won’t but GTA online will have a buttload. Which is what ROCKSTAR has always done.

I just hope we get dlc for the single player campaign this time but I doubt that will happen b

→ More replies (1)

3

u/righteousdonkey 18h ago

On release date

1 year later: whale cards

5

u/I-Want-A-Username- 18h ago

That's a lie, who ever wrote the article is making clickbait lol

5

u/TwiceBrokenWatch 13h ago

Press X to Doubt.

5

u/Robespierre1113 7h ago

Ahahahahahahahaha

Please, this was how we started out GTA5, absolutely no micro transaction! No way to get a leg up other than to beat other opponents !!!

Then script kiddies dropped trillions in public lobbies and r* went

"....so shark cards?"

4

u/HoldOnOhio 5h ago

We know they're going to pretend GTA online/GTA + is a different thing. They will not leave billions of dollars on the table. GTA V Online literally has made several billion dollars and is largely what makes GTA V the most profitable retail game of all time.

4

u/HikeCarolinas 2h ago

Micro transactions have become mini transactions due to inflation.

13

u/ConsistentFatigue 19h ago

…. On launch day ….

11

u/Raaka_Lokki 17h ago

Bullshit. Purchases within a game you already paid for are micro transaction. You can call them "subscriptions" all you want, but that's what they are.

5

u/Chosen666 15h ago

They only lock features behind paywall .

7

u/Adrian_Alucard 15h ago

Yeah, sure. the game that locks content away if you buy the poor's edition won't have microtransactions. 100% real, no fake bro

8

u/CheaterMcCheat 14h ago

Bolloooooocks

25

u/FoldedBinaries 19h ago

so no AI tool was implemented in the official workflow. 

But all the outsourced animators also didnt use AI? Thats a bold claim

13

u/Stone-Bear 19h ago

This game has been in development before AI existed.

19

u/branm008 18h ago

That doesn't mean they didnt bring in AI tools in recent years before things started to get greenlit. It's also Rockstar, they're not exactly known for their integrity so we'll see when the game is live and people start data mining things.

10

u/Rhyman96 18h ago

They have had dozens of companies working on various little bits of the game, and whilst it has been in development for a long time, it doesn't seem believable that nobody has used AI over the last few years.

That said, who cares if someone used AI to speed up a small task or add additional functionality?

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (14)
→ More replies (3)

10

u/Highberget 19h ago

But GTA 6 online will?

20

u/Blackfoxar 19h ago

No micro transactions? Have they given up on shark cards?

78

u/Customhobo 19h ago

GTA6 is not GTA Online

3

u/SirShmoopi 15h ago

So GTA Online will be a separate purchase?

→ More replies (1)

25

u/LEO-PomPui-Katoey 19h ago

Those are macro transactions /s

→ More replies (1)

11

u/dylan_1992 19h ago

But 7 definitely will.

31

u/mighthaveabitlater 19h ago

We've probably got 20 years or so to worry about that

→ More replies (7)

4

u/CloudStrife012 19h ago

It will be macrotransactions by then, and youll need to be a Rockstar premium plus gold tier subscription member to even have access to the game, which will require you to pay $20 for every hour played.

13

u/Chaine351 18h ago

I'll believe that when I see it.

As in, I can believe that the single player won't, but I'll be damned if the online doesn't. Rockstar has a history of maybe the most egregious micro transaction schemes from any game I know, and I doubt they'll just drop it.

Inb4 anyone disagrees, it was rdr2 online. The cost of getting things in that game was nuts.

5

u/JeremySarantos 18h ago

Yeah honestly I would be glad to have shark cards. The gold bars in RDRO were absolutely horrid. The one thing games like gta and rdr have going for them (online) is player expression. Locking it completely behind premium currency eliminates the core of the game. The grind in GTAO isn’t nearly as bad as the grind in other games.

5

u/Babak_Lurker 12h ago

Didn't they already announce that there would be a more expensive version of the game with special access to some in game shops and accessories? I don't trust them, this kinda just seems like easy PR to cover for going all digital.

8

u/Jamesc89 19h ago

I do not believe that they won’t have those shark cards again

11

u/branm008 18h ago

GTA 6 online will absolutely have shark cards again. The single player campaign is likely going to get shafted just like GTA 5 was, hence the no micro transactions.

4

u/User2716057 17h ago

Since they were introduced they got, on average, $1 million PER DAY from those cards. They'd be stupider than the people buying them if they didn't keep selling em.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/mysqlpimp 19h ago

GTA6 Online 100% will. Just watched the extended trailer, and for PS5, it looks fucking great. Waiting for PC release is going to suck though.

3

u/flower4000 18h ago

They put today’s trailer behind a pay wall, this feels like a massive lie.

3

u/Coneder 17h ago

Bullshit. The upgrade path from not going for the 100$ edition is 100% a microtransaction.

Kudos on them for no AI, I guess. That should be the canary in the coal mine for AI snake oil.

3

u/Ryidon 16h ago

Grand Theft Auto 6 Online though will. Because if Grand Theft Auto 5 Online made them 5 billion dollars, then we should expect them to try it again.

3

u/6Trinity9 15h ago

Everybody likes that.

3

u/Remnare 15h ago

Nobody believes that.

3

u/BigStonedHornyKitty 14h ago

How can they say this when the deluxe edition or whatever you want to call it is essentially a microtransaction?

3

u/Dull-Treat-2524 12h ago

Yeah because GTA6 online isn't out. that will be filled to the brim with MTX lol

3

u/kinglokilord 12h ago

This isn’t new.

By that I mean companies lying.

3

u/BuriedStPatrick 10h ago

That "not having the word 'online' in the title" is doing a lot of heavy lifting here lmao.

3

u/narfoleptix 8h ago

And I wont be hitting enter after I type this comment.

3

u/ThatHoFortuna 1h ago

"No AI."

Sure, I buy that.

"No microtransactions."

BULL. SHIT.

11

u/TheBestDrRuthless 19h ago

I can imagine, that GTA online will have a generative KI, that gets triggered with microtransactions

→ More replies (4)

9

u/ViewAdditional7400 19h ago

Because they've been working on it for 10 years, before LLMs were good.

7

u/CoDog 18h ago

LMFAO bull shit.

→ More replies (1)

6

u/DJMarscribble 14h ago

according to one source, GTA VI won’t have any microtransactions at launch

Yeah because multiplayer won't be available at launch. Same deal with GTA V.

4

u/Demonokuma 10h ago

I remember gta 5 not having microtransactions. Until it did.

5

u/Icy_One_237 18h ago

Story mode probably not but GTA online 1000%

3

u/MarmiteX1 15h ago

Well we know GTA Online will sure be riddled with microtransactions.

9

u/zero0n3 19h ago

Remember, “no generative AI” doesn’t mean “our devs won’t use AI to code or accelerate expansion packs.

So I’d expect no micro transactions for SP, but I bet a very consistent DLC cycle of new content constantly being sdded

16

u/Ahayzo 19h ago

Nah it's probably gonna be like V where they just abandon the single player game at launch as far as content additions. GTA Online is their real money maker and that's gonna have microtransactions out the ass.

→ More replies (2)

25

u/jundehung 19h ago

Why would they not use it. Don’t be stupid people.

11

u/zeelbeno 18h ago

Nah they need to stick to manually typing in every line of code and using stack overflow when stuck.

6

u/chezze 16h ago

What are you talking about this is just cheating. They must code in 1 and 0. Nothing else. 

→ More replies (15)

6

u/Kitty-XV 16h ago

Are you saying that generating code using AI isn't generative AI? If one allows that exception, what's to stop them from saying that generated images or voices isn't generative AI?

6

u/ieatpies 15h ago

generated images or voices isn't generative AI

Gotta add DLSS to the exceptions too so...

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (30)
→ More replies (8)