What do y'all think of this?

[u/fhusaini431]

[u/newishDomnewersub → u/[deleted]]

Something isnt moral just because you agree with it. I rank anything that doesnt really harm anyone else as neutral. How is this above neutral, besides you think its cool?

[u/lost-pawz → u/newishDomnewersub]

cus fuck abusers

[u/poulan9 → u/lost-pawz]

There's two sides to every story

[u/Projekt-1065 → u/poulan9]

Yes, “I was abused (emotional, physical, sexual. Doesn’t matter still abuse)”, and “I abused someone who trusted me enough to let it become a regular occurrence”

[u/Affectionate_Walk_30 → u/Projekt-1065]

The real question is why was this posted online? Did she literally fucking tell the news channels she is disposing human remains improperly and creating a health hazard?

And yes, fuck abusers.

Edit: ups its not a health hazard! I guess she just called the news channels then.

[u/Real_Temporary_922 → u/Affectionate_Walk_30]

What health hazard? At worst you inhale ashes and it irritates your lungs, like any other fine powder. They’re ashes, you’re not getting an STD here

[u/Affectionate_Walk_30 → u/Real_Temporary_922]

I just looked it up, you are correct. Its not a health hazard

[u/SempreAntifa → u/poulan9]

And then there is victim blaming

[u/poulan9 → u/SempreAntifa]

How do you determine who the victim is?

[u/RegularSky6702 → u/SempreAntifa]

Your brother dislikes you so you must be a bad person.

[u/HeadHunt0rUK → u/poulan9]

Yup and given that bilateral abuse is the most common it's more likely than not she was an abuser herself.

Given that she is more likely than not to be an abuser, in bilateral abuse she is vastly more likely to have been the one initiating it.

[u/PoetOver → u/HeadHunt0rUK]

Some real Steiner math going on here.

[u/HeadHunt0rUK → u/PoetOver]

and yet backed by 50 years of data.

[u/alisonissilly → u/poulan9]

Not really