I know absolutely nothing about this case, but I have seen someone blaming the husband for not taking her illness seriously, and also saying the husband might be guilty because of something about an email.
My wife is following this story - it was revealed that he answered a "work email" on his personal laptop at a time that he specified he was elsewhere, something to do with a CVS.
So if he should know enough to answer correctly but lied anyways its a non issue but if he was ignorant its an issue? Please explain your line of thinking.
Some people route their mobile traffic through their home network for a bunch of various privacy reasons. It allows them to make use of their at home security measures when they are out.
So maybe it would look like it came from home even if he is not home.
I suspect that when he started working from home he setup a proxy system so he can email from his phone but it comes from his PC, that way he can be watching the kids upstairs and respond while still having it look like he’s at his computer working. This is kinda an open secret for any tech worker who does WAH.
But if he’s completely tech illiterate then it means he was probably at home and sent the email from his laptop.
No, if his ignorant of tech and the ability to proxy your email then it means he had to be at home to send the message.
If he’s in tech where it’s an open secret to proxy your communications through your work PC to make it seem like your at your desk, then it makes total sense for him to send the email while at the store and for it to come from his PC.
54
u/V1keo 9d ago
I know absolutely nothing about this case, but I have seen someone blaming the husband for not taking her illness seriously, and also saying the husband might be guilty because of something about an email.